Preview

How Far Was Henry Vii’s Control over the Nobility in the Years 1485 to 1509 Due to His Financial Policies?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Was Henry Vii’s Control over the Nobility in the Years 1485 to 1509 Due to His Financial Policies?
How far was Henry VII’s control over the nobility in the years 1485 to 1509 due to his financial policies? (24 marks)

As Henry was a usurper, it was unlikely that he'd gained much support and loyalty from his Nobles although it did not evade the fact that he had to establish some authority over them. One of the primary methods Henry used was to either punish or reward his Nobility with his financial policies.

Henry had a very detailed and complex financial policy which enabled him to milk every penny he could from his Nobility or in fact avoid having to pay them all together. A prime example would be Henry's reluctance to grant titles and land as rewards, instead he preferred to award the ancient honour of the Order of the Garter. This significantly decreased the amount Henry had to pay out to his Nobles but it also kept them satisfied as it was such a prestigious award. Henry also used Bonds and Recognisances to restrain the power of his Nobility. Lord Burgavenny, for example, was fined £70,650 for the breach of such a Recognisance. This obviously contain the power of over mighty Nobles as it was estimated that between the years 1504-1508, Edmund Dudley collected £50,000 per annum from bonds. Such methods aided with controlling Nobility but there were other financial policies that contributed.

Every monarch of the time had to handle their Nobility, and it was no different for Henry. In fact Henry used very effective policies in order to strengthen his control over them. A notable policy would be the Acts of Attainders, in 1485 & 1504 he used this policy to declare 56 Nobleman guilty of crimes against the Crown. Thomas Howard lost the title Duke of Norfolk and his family estates after Bosworth, Henry was able to gain huge amounts of income from these Acts which increased his fragile control over the Nobility. As a result of the Acts of Attainders, the about of over mighty noble families numbered 5 in 1497, this shows how successful his financial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HOW FAR WAS HENRY VII’S CONTROL OF THE NOBILITY 1485 TO 1509 DUE TO HIS FINANCIAL POLICIES? (24 marks)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry worked hard to establish, consolidate and recover many foreign relations within his reign. This was mostly defensive due to pretenders threatening Henry’s throne which meant a lot of Henry’s foreign relations were defensive. However, Henry did also establish policies to help other factors during his reign.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ◦ Philip II was one of the post powerful Capetians who seized Normandy, had tripled his territory under direct control by the end of his reign, and established royal officials called bailiffs to centralize the government and collect king’s taxes. ◦ Estates-General was an assembly of representatives from all three of the estates, or social classes, in France, which increased royal power against the nobility. MAIN IDEAS 3. What two legal practices date back to Henry II?…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry the VII becomes King of England. Henrys mother Margaret was a decendant of Edward III. This gave Henry a claim to the throne. He sequered his crown by dividing and undermining the power of nobility. obilityHenry was eventually crowned as king on August 22nd 1485. He continued to rulke from ruled from August 1485 to April 1509.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How successful was Henry VII in dealing with challenges to his royal authority in the years 1489 to 1499?…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do these sources suggest that young Henry VIII was an impressive figure as a king?…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry’s first real aspirations of reclaiming the throne of England ostensibly came about in 1483 following the quashed Buckingham rebellion. This uprising showed Henry the lack of support for Richard and between 1483 and 1485, Henry sent emissaries to build support for himself in England, before being forced to flee from…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The household staff rose beyond mere servitude: Henry eschewed public appearances, therefore, staff members were the few persons Henry saw on a regular basis. He created the Committee of the Privy Council ,a forerunner of the modern cabinet) as an executive advisory board; he established the Court of the Star Chamber to increase royal involvement in civil and criminal cases; and as an alternative to a revenue tax disbursement from Parliament, he imposed forced loans and grants on the nobility. Henry's mistrust of the nobility derived from his experiences in the Wars of the Roses - a majority remained dangerously neutral until the very end. His skill at by-passing Parliament (and thus, the will of the nobility) played a crucial role in his success at renovating…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry’s political champion that would make both men vastly wealthy during their time of absolute power? Although these interpretations contain elements of truth, either way it would ultimately lead to his demise. Historians have had a continuous battle to determine the character of the multifaceted political animal that is Thomas Cromwell. The impact Cromwell had on English society made for the greatest political changes in the sixteenth century. He was one of Henry VIII’s most cherished advisors, however, to what extent did Cromwell’s own political and religious beliefs impact Henry and the course of…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward IV restored some elements of royal authority in the years 1471 – 1483, he had destroyed his opposition or forced them into exile, he used family member to control more volatile regions and took a keen interest in law and order. In addition he improved the English economy and made a somewhat successful invasion of France. Although some would argue that Edward failed at restoring Royal authority because his heirs were only young at his time of death, Nobel rivalry thought England and his foreign policy had begun to go wrong.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    During 1450- 1470, there were two main kingships; Henry VI and Edward IV. The first kingship was an…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the rule of Henry VI, certain nobles had increasing amounts of power, which angered some of the other nobles who felt they were being ignored. It is certain that they had too much power at the time, and that this was a contributing cause for the outbreak of the conflicts, however it was catalysed by things like bastard feudalism These sources show various views linked to the statement that “the problem of an over-mighty nobility was the main cause of the outbreak of the wars of the roses”. In this essay, I will put the sources in context using my own knowledge and see how far they support or disagree the statement, and to what extent it is true.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays