Preview

How Far Were Ideological Factors Responsible for Stalin’s Decision to Replace the Nep with the Collectivisation of Agriculture and the Five Year Plans?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Were Ideological Factors Responsible for Stalin’s Decision to Replace the Nep with the Collectivisation of Agriculture and the Five Year Plans?
How far were ideological factors responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans?
I believe that ideological factor were responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans as Stalin was disgruntled by the peasants work ethic and continuingly wanted to become more communist and ideological issues were the main contributors that, if changed would make a vast difference to Russia. However, other factors also could have been responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans such as political and economical aspects. I feel that the main contributor in determining Stalin’s decision was the economic factors that Stalin was determined to industrialise Russia and under the NEP this was not possible.
Ideological factors were responsible for Stalin’s decision to replace the NEP with the collectivisation of agriculture and the Five Year Plans as the introduction of these new things meant that Russia could become more communist which was what Stalin ultimately wanted. Before collectivisation was introduced, Stalin felt that peasant attitude lacked revolutionary spirit, rather than producing grain for the good of the community the peasants produced it for themselves and their own profit. This was viewed as capitalism and was against what Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Russia tried to achieve and the NEP was helping the peasants develop capitalism. This is true in that of the introduction of collectivisation and the Five Year Plans and Stalin constantly wanted to become a ‘more communist’ state. Through collectivisation Stalin promised significant increase in production which would allow the government to sell more overseas, providing more resources for industrialisation and a higher standard of living for urban workers. Collectivisation had a devastating effect on the Russian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also another reason why the NEP was so unpopular with the Communists was because of the split it made in the party. The left and the right, the left believed in the in ending the NEP and begin rapid industrialisation however the right believed in keeping the NEP and encouraged the peasants to become richer. This had a negative effect on the communists especially as the government was a part of a democratic centralism which meant that they decided all the decisions and policies centrally this organizational method describes the freedom of members of the political party to discuss and debate matters of policy and direction, but once the decision of the party is made by majority vote, all members are expected to uphold that decision. By the left and right opposing one another this meant that the main party members and members of the Politburo who…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NEP, having links and similarities between Capitalist and Communist ideas, were opposed by the Communists between the Bolsheviks themselves. This was because they believed the NEP wasn’t totally Communist policy which aggravated some members of the Communist party. They were also worried that a conflict of interest would cause splits between the parties would only be inflicting damage to themselves. Many Bolsheviks resigned mainly because the NEP was a massive withdrawal from the previous policy which was based on pure Communist ideology. The NEP gave the peasants more freedom by allowing them to gain their own profits through their private ownership.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was the process by which Russian agriculture was reformed, small farm were merged into larger units, in hope of production becoming more efficient and increasing its output. Stalin was aware of the increasing possibility of a war with Germany and so self-efficiency in food production became more imminently important in order to survive a war against the western powers. From 1927-1929 harvests fell, simultaneously affecting the wider economy. The government needed to sell grain abroad so they could receive the foreign currency necessary for resources needed for industrialisation. Collectivisation was therefore introduced to increase efficiency and introduce mechanisation. This added urgency to a need to increase output meant that high targets were set which were met with incentives and also punishments, pushing the economy towards its maximum potential making the essential contribution to the transformation of the Russian economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) To what extent was the New Economic Policy (NEP) essential to the Bolshevik consolidation of power?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, in 1924, Stalin wanted to keep the NEP going, even though it went against Marxism as the NEP meant that a mixed economy in which there were features of capitalism. The main reason Stalin did this was because it was a measure brought in by Lenin, and at the time, Stalin wished to make himself seem as loyal to Lenin as possible, to appear to be the natural heir.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period before 1941, Stalin was able to institute his economical policies of Collectivization and the 5-year plans. ‘Backwards was to be defeated and enslaved’. Russia had to make up for 100 years of lost time for fear of being consumed by the western world. Stalin, sole leader of the Bolsheviks by the late 1920’s, believed that Russia could modernize their Agricultural and Industrial sectors through his policies.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josephe Stalin DBQ

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stalin launched his first Five-Year Plan in 1928 by setting up a command economy. The purpose of the Five-Year plan was to create a road map for Stalin’s great goals of industrialization and the development of the Soviet Unions (OI.) Specific goals were set in the areas of electricity, coal, oil, pig-iron, and steel (DOC 2.) The Five-Year plan resulted in strengthening the Soviet Unions economic position and turned it into a powerful industrial state. In an excerpt from The Land of the Soviets its stated, “The rate of industrial growth in the USSR considerably exceeded that of the capitalist countries.” (DOC 8.) This is proven in several charts showing the rapid growth in farming and industrialization (DOCS 2, 3, 4.) Stalin said, “To slow down would mean falling behind. And those who fall behind are beaten. But we do not want to be beaten! One feature of the old Russia was the continual beatings she suffered for falling behind, for her backwardness….” (DOC 1.) This momentum helped arouse Russian pride to motivate the people. Stalin’s method of motivation imposed the people to come together as one and get ahead in order to dodge falling behind or any kind of harm to their country (OI.)…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following his succession to power in 1924, Stalin promised the Russian people that he would carry on Lenin's legacy, which meant continuing with Lenin's policies and also his aim to establish communism throughout the Soviet Union and the rest of the world. However, comparing their strategies, one finds that Stalin moved away from Lenin's ideals, War Communism and his New Economic Policies (NEP).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first five year plan was installed in 1928 and lasted till 1933, the aim was to create an industrial base for further development, Stalin wanted to achieve rapid expansion of coal and steel production, electrical power and transport. Stalin had a huge benchmark for the peasants, which could be seen as Stalin’s main downfall in the plans. He called for at least 20% per annual increase and with his brutal force he was going to make sure that the increase would happen.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin’s NEP and Stalin’s Five Year plans were similar in that they both were devised in attempt to better the economy in Russia, they both were based on the benefit from agriculture since Russia had a lot of farms, they both were supposed to better the lives of the people, and they relied on the peasant. They were different in that the NEP was a form of capitalism in which private property was allow, that the peasants had a reasonable quota to meet and could sell their surplus themselves, small business were successful, and it increased the standard of living of the peasants and works. The Five Year plans took away private property, began collectivization of farm, set unreasonably high quotas that were impossible to meet, decreased the standard of living of peasants, resulted in strikes and revolts of farmers, and industrialized Russia. The one that was more successful was the NEP because the economy prospered and reached pre- World War I levels. There was success for the small business and since peasants could sell their surplus, not as many people were starving. Unlike under Stalin’s Five Year plans, there was not much of a shortage of food for the people. The standard of living for the workers were higher under the NEP. The societal costs to achieve quotas under Stalin were that it made the standard of living for the workers worse since the unrealistic quotas were set that the peasants could not meet. There was food shortages and Stalin did not care enough to do something about. Even when his wife brought to up to him, he completely ignored it. Peasants opposed the collectivization and burned their crops as a response. In the Ukraine, as a result of the quotas, there was a man-made famine in 1932 to 1933. Millions of people dies under the 5 Year plans. Additionally, workers could only buy 60 percent of what they did in 1913 because consumption had to be decreased in order to pay for…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NEP was an economic policy brought in by Lenin as a temporary solution to the USSR’s financial problems which was causing famines and massive unemployment at the time. As NEP was only considered a temporary solution by Lenin, Stalin was able to support NEP whilst it was working and when it started to fail as a solution he wanted to get rid of it. This helped him to remove some rival candidates as it wasn’t going against Lenin, and the other candidates that continued to support NEP weren’t going with Lenin’s ideas as he would have removed it once it had stopped working.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Stalin believed that Russia was one hundred years behind the west. He devised his Five Year Plan to bring Russia up to speed with the rest of the world. This plan included many of Trotsky's ideas, which Stalin had previously opposed. We can relate this to the building of the windmill in Animal Farm and how Napoleon was against the idea until after the expulsion of Snowball. Russia's economy was centralized on agriculture with over twenty five million farms. Unfortunately, the majority of these barely produced enough to feed the families of those who worked them. Farmers who had a surplus of produce were called kulaks. Stalin decided he would "liquidate the kulaks as a class" under collective agriculture. He believed that once the population of "those just…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • To modernize agriculture, Stalin encourage Soviet farmers to combine their small family farms into huge collective farms owned and run by the state. • The state takeover of farming was completed within a few years, but with terrible consequences.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The nature of Stalin's economic policies and their impact on the people of Russia is a widely debated topic. It's also a difficult topic on which to focus an enquiry, complicated as it is by the reluctance of the Soviets to release all relevant documents, and the political views of those interpreting to documents, driven as many were by their own agendas. However, the documents that have been selected for this enquiry have been chosen for the light they shed on the problem and in the expectation that they will enable a conclusion, however provisional, to be drawn.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile, in communist Russia Stalin had taken the reigns of the Bolshevik party, having exiled Trotsky completely from Russia. Stalin set in place the first five-year plan, with GOSPLAN, the national planning agency in control of everything. He abolished the NEP and banned small industry, while rapidly trying to collectivize farms, believing they would be far more efficient as larger industrially run machines. He encouraged many peasants to move to the cities and become involved in the industrial revolution taking part. Stakhanovism became a prominent ideology, and in the footsteps of great achiever Stakhanov, many men tried very hard to beat quotas to receive raises, better housing and special treatment. Another facet of the five-year plan was the purges. Stalin purged the government, the army and the country of everyone that disagreed with him. He killed millions, through mass…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays