During the Late 1800s, Russia was going through stages of economic reforms and developments. Russia faced many problems at the end of the nineteenth century. Under Minister of Finance Ivan Vyshnegradskii there had been famine because of high taxes on consumer goods which had forced peasants to sell more and more grain. The government were slow to act and, although they eventually enforced a ban on grain exports, 350,000 died of starvation or disease. Economically and industrially Russia was also falling far behind many other Western countries at the time, like Britain and Germany. When Count Witte became Minister of Finance in 1893, there was desperate need to decrease inflation, improve infrastructure and encourage foreign investment. I agree with the hypothesis that Witte’s reforms were the most important because of the reforms he put in place to secure the development of capital goods, coal, iron, steel and oil, the building blocks of future economic growth
Sergei Witte’s reforms were extremely important because he linked industrial growth with a stronger nation politically and economically, and therefore invited foreign experts from more industrialised countries like Britain, France and Germany to Russia to advise him on modernisation. In Russia, industrial growth increased on average by 8% a year between 1890 and 1899, which was the highest growth rate of any of the world’s major economies. This highlights the impact of Witte’s new reforms showing that they work to an incredible level and make a huge step to reaching economic stability and a big step in modernisation and industrialisation and therefore have been the most effective and important form of reform in the 18th Century.
Another point that supports the fact that Sergei Witte’s Reforms were extremely important was that he decided to make the rouble more sought after by putting it on the Gold Standard in 1897. This meant that it was directly exchangeable for gold, which had a higher value. This was done because Russia had a high rate of inflation, so foreign capital was more valuable. This was extremely successful, as foreign investment dramatically increased and value of the rouble increased. The increase in national income between 1894 and 1913 in European Russia was 50%. This highlights the fact that Witte could pour money into improving industry, a step towards his goal of catching up with other industrialised countries because of the increased amount of investment in an attempt to stimulate Russia’s economy.
However, Witte’s policies also caused economic, political and social problems for Russia causing them to have limitations which decreased their level of importance. There were dreadful working conditions. Working hours were long, for example Kanatchikov writes in his memoirs ‘A Radical Worker in Tsarist Russia’ that days in his factory in Moscow lasted eleven and a half hours with only one break for lunch which lasted an hour and a half. Wages were low and did not rise with inflation, and jobs were insecure. Witte’s policy of industrialising may have been positive for the Russian economy as a whole, but the people who really benefitted were the upper and middle classes. For the people working in the factories, life was no better than it had been as peasants.
There were also other very significant reforms taking place between 1881 and 1905 in Russia such as his predecessor, Vyshnegradskii (1887-1892), had imposed tariffs to raise revenue and discourage importing from other countries and increasing direct taxes, pushing for an export drive and increasing railway lines achieving a balanced budget, accumulating gold reserves and strengthening the rouble. Witte continued with many of Vyshnegradskii’s policies like indirect taxes, and his greatest success – making the rouble directly exchangeable for gold – had actually already been suggested by the two previous Ministers for Finance who had been preparing the Russian economy for it. His high tariffs and policies that focused mostly on heavy industry were unpopular with the public who were 80% serfs. Most of his policies did not meet the needs of the nation and only directly helped investors and industrialists.
Although the evidence points towards both successes and failures, I think that Witte was to a great extent a success. He addressed the problems of a weak currency and the lack of foreign investment, which were the main economic problems at the time. Some of his policies were just continuations of other economists’ ideas, but he actually implemented them for Russia. His main focus was on heavy industry and his polices often did not benefit the majority of the population but under an autocracy and while a lot of money was being poured into military activity I believe that he did well to stabilise the economy.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
How far do you agree that Sergei Witte’s policies were successful in modernising the Russian economy in the period of 1892-1904?…
- 1583 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. A move to industrialization was part of the process of change. In Russia, state support was vital, because it lacked a middle class and capital. A railway system was created in the 1870s. It reached the Pacific in the 1880s. Siberia was opened to development and increased Russian involvement in Asia. Under Count Wittle, the government passed…
- 947 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Russia economy in terms of industry fluctuated over the period from 1855-1964. It is key to note that under all the leaders, industrialisation and modernisation was always seen as an essential economic aim. Under Alexander II, with Reutern as his Minister of finance who adopted an approach that revolved around continued railway construction, attraction of foreign expertise and foreign investment capital. As a result modernisation and expansion occurred within the staples as well as newer industries which show the impact that alexander II made on industry. Reutern achieved a sevenfold increase in the amount of railway and the capacity of railway to carry break bulk at speed increased which gave a major boost to industrial output Russia seemed to be finally moving towards industrialisation and keeping up with the West. This approach was similar under Nicolas II who also managed to have a great impact on Russia’s industrial economy. This was through the work of Sergei Witte whom at the time of his appointment the Russian economy still resolved predominantly around agricultural production further showing that under Alexander II impacts was limited. Witte continued the idea of foreign expertise as well as taking out foreign loans, raising taxes and interest rates to boost available…
- 2039 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event developed Russian government and society up to the 21st century has been so tremendous that they cannot be disregarded. However when one considers the argument of the likes of Louis Hobart who suggests the event was only a contributing element to ‘the social and economic transformation’ it must be asked to what extent was this event alone a key turning point in the development of Russian Government?…
- 1456 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
After the 1905 revolution Russia was in need of reforms both economically and politically, to allow it maintain its role of a great power and to prevent another revolution occurring the answer to this was the October Manifesto. However, due to the stubbornness of the Tsar who was determined not to relinquish his autocratic powers, what may have appeared as reforms were largely superficial making little change in particular to the Russian political system.…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Progress in Russia was slow until the reign of Alexander ll. He was known as the Tsar liberator for his radical reform during his reign from 1855 to 1881. His most important reform was the emancipation of the serfs. When Alexander lll became Tsar it was the end of any political reform. His reign was known for being one of political repression.…
- 794 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
By 1881, Russia had greatly changed. Reforms had been carried out, creating less of a gap between the social classes, and making society a fairer place. There were also developments in industry, helping Russia catch up with the western world. However, the country was still ruled in a way that out pleasing the autocracy over helping the peasants, and there was still not total freedom for everyone.…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
which aided in the stabilization of the Russian economy and from being a victim of…
- 1053 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Donald Bogle identifies five recurring Black types: The Tom, Coons, mulattoes, mammies, and bucks; in the film there are no such stereotypical characters because the film is based on a real person who dealt with racial segregation and discrimination. For Cripps shared group value of how information is shared across, generations, class, and gender. The film an example class is when a character named Mrs. Maybry (Polly Bergen) a middle class white woman who Cliff assists. Mrs. Maybry helps educate Cliff by checking out books from the segregated library which are not available to blacks. Another example of is when the film introduces a character named Cleve (Richard Roundtree), the local iceman, who has hired Cliff to help him on his rounds.…
- 153 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…
- 837 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
TIME LINE 1855-1881 Alexander II established the zemstvos: a form of local self government First Russian westernization attempt 1861- Emancipation of Serf: was incomplete serfs were left to pay for their land… redemption payments Mir: village community 1863-1864 reforms of law, education and local government 1881 Alexander II assassinated 1881-1894 Alexander III instituted an era of repression and reaction denounced democracy, free press blood revolution police force Okharana 1891 famine • crops failed and there were no reserves; Russia had great famine The Witte System: Railroads, Industry, Tax the Peasants He wanted to expand Russian industry and develop its economy Building railroads will stimulate the growth of other industries Results of Witte System: o Growth of industry at 8% per year…
- 1541 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
How successful were Alexander II’s reforms in strengthening the Tsarist regime in the years 1855 to 1881? (24 marks)…
- 7465 Words
- 24 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Tsarist system of government underwent many changes throughout the years of 1881-1914. Both Alexander III and Nicholas II created several modifications, being both good and bad, to the government during these years. Alexander III created mostly negative changes, due to him being seen as a reactionary, whereas Nicholas II created mainly positive changes to the government as a result of the 1905 revolution. These changes can be categorised into political, economic and social modifications.…
- 1624 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays