Preview

How Powerful Are Nuclear Weapons Too Powerful?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Powerful Are Nuclear Weapons Too Powerful?
I believe that nuclear weapons are too powerful. The use of nuclear weapons can result in a massive amount of lost lives. Both military and innocent civilians. There are also long lasting effects of nuclear weapons. From the bombing of hiroshima and it was found that half a century later people still suffer from the after effects like cancer and birth defects. Radioactive particles from the explosion can also contaminate the air, soil, water and the food supply. It can also be carried by wind currents to different locations causing environmental damage to places far from the actually drop of the bomb. Nuclear weapons can also cause massive amounts of damage to a country's infrastructure and cause economic issues that can affect other states. However, although they are powerful and have the potential to deal large amounts of damage. I think nothing should be done about them.

The first
…show more content…
A state is less likely to go to war against a state with nuclear weapons regardless of whether they have them themselves or not. A nuclear war could result in massive amounts of lives lost, economic destruction for both countries, and the cost for manufacturing nuclear weapons is high. As a result of this countries are more likely to consider all options before going to war. Nuclear weapons also help prevent wars with smaller, weaker countries that are allied with states that possess nuclear weapons. States would be afraid of attacking the allied states due to fear of the nuclear states retaliating. Due to the high cost of nuclear weapons, it also makes it easier for states to talk diplomatically to work this out, since no one wants to get into a conflict that can end with the use of nuclear weapons. This makes it more likely that both nations would first resort to negotiating to reach an agreement or compromise. To insure that massive destruction is avoided. Which helps guarantee peace for as long as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The long-term effect of nuclear weapons has primarily been deterring their use, but its use in short-term strategies have been…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.1 Nuclear weapons are a topic of concern to the entire globe; they’re weapons of mass destruction and their effects transcend national boundaries. Catastrophic nuclear events of the 20th century shaped the weapon world, such as the Japanese tragedy at the conclusion of World War II and the Cuban Missile Crisis of the Cold War. On August 6, 1945 United States released a nuclear bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. It eliminated or injured almost 130,000 individuals. Three days later, the United States bombed another Japanese city, Nagasaki, which resulted in 150,000 dead or wounded.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The overall mood of the Tell Tale Heart is suspenseful because the narrator thinks that the old man has a vulture eye. Every time the narrator sees this old man's eye he gets cold hearted. First the text says, the narrator is planning to kill the old man because he feels like it is a vulture eye. This shows a suspenseful mood because now we are just waiting for something else to happen, now that the narrator said he was going to kill the old man. Next, the text says, the narrator has been watching the old man sleep for seven nights, and now on the eighth night the old man wakes up while the narrator is watching him, and asks who's there.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the biggest problem with nuclear weapons and the public is the fear factor also. As we look back at the different wars fought there was only two nuclear bombs that were dropped. If you listen to conversations today you would believe that they had been used in every major war. According to Mauroni "there has been no public confirmation that a terrorist group has ever obtained, is about to get, or currently has a nuclear weapon, anxieties over that end-state have been converted into conclusions"(2012, p 10). I can understand wanting to have the same power as another country but I think that is where things get tricky. Look at the fact of gun control in America today. I have plenty of guns and I have always had access to them…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first area of nuclear non-usage I will look at will be the arguments brought forward by proliferation pessimists and optimists. Kennitz Waltz, a proliferation optimist argues on one hand we cannot stop the spread of nuclear weapons. It’s inevitable because states seek power through nuclear weapons; even smaller, less powerful states align themselves with nuclear wielding states for protection and security. But on the other hand, Waltz argues states are rational actors, and believes nuclear weapons will be used responsibly, which is why nuclear weapons have not been used. For Waltz, more states who have nuclear weapons, the better. Waltz writes, “A blatant…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The threat of terrorism makes people scared, terrorist attack anytime, anywhere, where as a nuclear state carrying out a possible nuclear attack can be monitored to stop such attacks.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as:…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effects of the New Deal

    • 1144 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Great Depression plunged the American people into an economic crisis unlike any endured in this country before. The depression put millions of hardworking individuals into poverty, and for more than a decade neither the free market nor the federal government was able to restore prosperity. Many people who lived through the Depression often saw themselves as the survivors of a terrible battle; in for the rest of their lives many feared losing their money and property again. There were some people who even bought land whenever they could afford it so that if the Depression returned, they would have somewhere to live. The Great Depression effected Americans socially, economically and politically. The Depression provided the drive for President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. The New Deal was made to help the economy and also help Roosevelt politically.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays