Preview

Scare

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
866 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scare
Bomb Scare: The History and Future of Nuclear Weapons
By Joseph Cirincione
Summary by Elaine Lynn for Book Club discussion

Concise, authoritative and fascinating, this book was originally published in 2006. The paperback edition was updated to 2007.

The governments of the United States and the Soviet Union have been both wise and spectacularly lucky. No one doubts that the world is safer today because the danger of global thermonuclear war has been greatly diminished. The American and Soviet leaders gradually developed command and control systems that were successful in preventing accidents, unauthorized attacks and other immediate causes of war.

Most of the accidents and close calls are probably still hidden away, yet to be uncovered by historians. Cirincione mentions one we know of in 1995 when Russia mistook a Norwegian weather rocket for a US submarine-launched ballistic missile. Yeltsin had only a few minutes to launch havoc on the world, but he decided that the “information” must be a mistake.

Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.

In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.

New nuclear nations have been born. When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, Ukraine instantly became the third greatest nuclear power on the face of the globe. Kazakhstan and Belarus also became part of the nuclear family by virtue of the Soviet military facilities left in their territory. It wasn’t immediately obvious to all their citizens

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    After the end of the Second World War, the world was left with two superpowers with competing ideologies: The United States of America and the Soviet Union. The Americans had come out of the war with a surging economy and served as the flagship for the capitalist nations of the West. The Soviets on the other hand practiced Communism, an ideology that was seen as a great threat to the Western way of life. 1 Though they had been allied at the end of the war, both nations quickly moved to bolster their military and economic infrastructure to prepare for the era of pseudo-colonialism and competition between the two powers they both knew would follow. By 1949, the Soviets would become the world’s second nuclear power, launching most of the world into a full out cold war between the communist East and the capitalist West. Competition between these ideologies meant that each side would fight to protect their influence in foreign nations, to spread their ideologies to new nations, and to protect against the spread of their enemy’s ideology to new nations; a policy the West…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike System Effectiveness

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A development that could have been preventable through possible disarmament negotiations after the war, had the US not underestimated the USSR. Considering the aftermath of World War II, the USSR had lost an estimate of 22 million lives and had large decimated areas of land. The US couldn’t possibly see the USSR as a military threat due to the heavy casualties the nation had sustained. In all likeliness, the US may have thought that “nuclear diplomacy” would be enough to quell the USSR if the need arose. A decade later the USSR had displayed its very own jet-bomber called the Mya-4 “Bison”. In 1955, an American air force attache, had observed twice the number of Bisons that were estimated to have been made. This jet-bomber was far more capable of inflicting injury upon the US than the Tu-4, and to further the anxiety of the US, the USSR had detonated its first thermonuclear weapon in…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the end of World War 2 came the Cold war with many controversies even between former allies. Communist Russia forced control over their section that was gained in the Potsdam conference. They set up many barriers around their portion of East Berlin and eventually around East Germany. America had dropped the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and a new technology been revealed as a massive, deadly weapon that could wipe out thousands instantly, it was now an arms race. “Push of a button in Russia, and 35 minutes later much of U.S. could be laid to waste—with power to retaliate limited.” (Document E)…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia did give up some of its nuclear weapons from the Soviet controlled states of Ukraine and Kazakhstan, but the country has still continued to maintain its much larger arsenal of nuclear warheads. Likewise, the United States has done nothing to reduce their arsenal of warheads but has instead invested billions to modernize these weapons. NATO, the organization created for the sole purpose of preventing Soviet invasion, has done nothing about the territorial ambitions of now Russian president Vladimir Putin. Putin’s annexation of Crimea and invasion of Ukraine has been met only with Western leaders denouncing his actions, but doing nothing to combat them. This is the same response that the Soviet Union’s actions were met with throughout the Cold War. Public denouncing of their actions was the response from both sides when the other did something they did not approve of. The reason why is the same reason why it’s the case today as well. The fear of nuclear destruction is still present, maybe even more so now then 25 years ago. We like to believe that since the collapse of the Soviet Union the threat of nuclear warfare just magically went away, but the reality is that it has stayed in play with no end in…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The use of Nuclear Power has always been a controversial subject, but during the technology’s…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cold War in 1980s

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Since Cold War began at the end of World War in the late 1940s, the two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, were racing their power to get their dominance over another. Each side feared the other’s superior weapons, such as the United States had nuclear weapon and the USSR had their mighty Red Army. The Cold War spread through decades and seemed to be indefinite. Two superpowers with the race of weapon not only weakened their economy but also threaten each other with their massive arsenals. Two sides negotiated to reduce half the numbers of nuclear weapon on each side as they worried that if the war started, it would be the third World War, and the destruction of the third war would be tremendous and severe. 1980s turned out to be the most important decade with many events which lead the Soviet Union to dissolved officially and breaking up into fifteen separate nations on December 31, 1991.…

    • 3497 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1985, the United States and the Soviet Union relations were coming to a new balance of power when the Soviet Union collapsed into independent nation’s beginning early in 1985. After years of Soviet military build-up at the expense of domestic development; economic growth was at a standstill. The United States was flourishing from an economic boast in a growth and strengthening of military power to bring the United States into a new leap in technological advancement over the Soviet’s. In Ronald Reagan’s second inaugural speech, he states in paragraph 30 that “One nation, the Soviet Union, has conducted the greatest military buildup in the history of man, building arsenals of awesome offensive weapons.” In this statement, Ronald Reagan knew that he had to direct the United States’ Military in a direction that would equal or surpass the strength of the Soviet military and any future threat to this nation that would come. The balance of power here between both super powers of the time was to build the military might as much as possible all in only to avoid the use of the last resort of a weapon that would be to come to a nuclear war.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This book is structured as a debate between the authors on the subject of nuclear proliferation. Waltz “argues that because nuclear weapons ‘will never the less spread,’ the end result will be stabilizing. His main point is that ‘nuclear weapons make wars hard to start’ and that even radical states will act like rational ones because of the mutually deterrent effort of nuclear weapons. Sagan . . . fears the worst because of ‘inherent limits in organizational reliability.…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many different benefits and drawbacks to each side taken on the matter on what we should do about nuclear weapons in the world. We must measure these benefits and drawbacks to determine which decision is the best for future security of our country.…

    • 3210 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The likelihood is dwindling of another large scale war between superpowers, ala World War I or II. The promise of mutually assured destruction, increased media transparency, and interconnected economic dependencies make a conflict between two or more large military forces improbable. Our focus regarding nation states has instead turned to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction among unstable or belligerent countries like Iran and North Korea. These situations help reinforce the need for a mission of deterrence, requiring the maintenance of a significant conventional and nuclear capability.1…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia clearly understands that under today's conditions the spread of nuclear weapons, together with missile vehicles of their' delivery, would be fraught with generating strategic turmoil, Increased risk of regional conflicts and use of nuclear weapons. Quite naturally, it is urgent to counteract such a course of events. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is the main factor allowing the community to hold back such a development of events, providing at the same time for the development of international cooperation in the sphere of peaceful use of nuclear energy. That is why Russia attaches great importance to the comprehensive and impartial consideration of the NPT functioning.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear disarmament should stick to the principles of maintaining global strategic balance and stability and undiminished security for all. The development of missile defense systems that undermine global strategic balance and stability should be abandoned.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays