Should United States Make And Test Weapons Of Mass Destruction

The United States should not continue to develop and test weapons of mass destruction because it can kill millions,It's expensive and has lack of morals. On August 6, 1945 Harry S. Truman, had to make a world changing and tough decision. The United States dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb all over Japan,Hiroshima.The explosion destroyed 90% of the city and very quickly killed about 80,000 people and later on because of radiation exposure , 10,000 people died. The United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s harmful, costs a lot, and has flaws. The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.
Another reason is nuclear weapons are very pricey and for poor nations the nuclear weapons are going to be hard to invest.Its only good for wealthy nations.For example ”The United States has estimated 7,300 nuclear weapons”.Each nuclear weapon costing about $114-$142 million dollars per unit in the beginning stage of the production.
“Even if you pay all this money trying to help the nation, it can negatively affect the treasury and make things worse”.This evidence supports the thesis because It is a waste of money and is so much trouble , it can cost a political criticism.Lastly nuclear weapons cost millions and makes poorer nations invest because of the cost and maintenance.It is not a good
idea. A final reason is lack of morals,It is difficult trying to get rid of nuclear arms. This is supported by the fact that “Nuclear weapons have security,political and economic implications.In the ultimate analysis,however the issue of nuclear weapons is a moral question”.This is also true because “the United states and Russia agreed to decrease the numbers of nuclear weapons deployed to set an example for other nations”.From this information we can conclude that even though Russia and the US agreed to decrease the numbers,”the nuclear weapon is still considered highly immoral and very dangerous.Therefore, “nuclear weapons even if they were decreased it is still very dangerous and can create a world crisis. To be fair, some would argue that nuclear weapons offer global defense, a power supply, or a war deterrent. Nonetheless, this is invalid because terrorists are still around and one of their worst attacks could be with the use of a nuclear weapon. Others may suggest that nuclear weapons are protected with high security and it's impossible for a terrorist to be able to have ownership of one. Yet, terrorists are capable of stealing “parts of a bomb” as said in CNN. With “their money and capabilities it's very possible for them to bring the material anywhere and detonate the bomb”. However, through evidence, it is obvious that the United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s dangerous to nature, high-priced, and immoral. The United States shouldn’t develop and test weapons of mass descrution.My evidence is that, it can destroy everything,some people even call it the killer machine. Next it costs millions and things still can go wrong and it has implications in categories as in security, political, and economic issues.A nuclear weapon as so many errors and possibilities it break down.It can do more damage than u think. It can create so many problems between nations all over the world.