The main reason nuclear weapons should be banned is the simple fact that they kill or severely injure. The most remembered use of a nuclear weapon was during World War 2, when we, the U.S., used the bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima killing millions and destroying everything in those cities. Not everyone died at once, some people died instantly while others died a slow, agonizing, painful death. The painful death was caused by fallout, which is a radioactive chemical used in making the bomb. The chemical is usually radium or plutonium, and is very deadly when inhaled. The stuff is spread everywhere when the bomb explodes, and then falls to the earth as light dust. If a person intakes a small amount they have a chance at living, but with severe health problems for the rest of their life. Large amounts will eat away the insides of a human, and eventually kill him. The related health problems could be anywhere from heart, lung, or kidney problems, etc. These health problems will lead to an earlier death than normal, but will also lead to medical bills beyond belief.
The next major setback is the cost. A nuclear weapon takes around 1 million dollars to make. Then there are tons and tons of them made costing us more and more, while we as a nation are in the trillions of dollars in debt. Now after you make the weapon you need a silo or some type of area to keep it which costs more money. After the constructors find a place to store the weapon, they need some guards to guard it so none of those Libyan terrorists steal it. Guess what, that takes more money. Through the whole process the government has to pay the people working to build the weapon, and add a little more to that so they keep it Top Secret and don't go tell the Russians our secrets. All this money the government puts out to make these weapons could be put to other uses. Just a shot in the dark, but if they stopped making weapons all together and concentrated all that money on the National Debt, we could probably pay it off in a matter of 20 years.
The final cause would be the space they take up. The smallest of the nuclear weapons would be an Atomic Bomb, because it's only the size of a normal room. Although we have those surface to air missiles and scud missiles that are three to four stories tall. Those missiles need silos to store them, and there are around 20,000 in existence today. Then what about all those top secret projects that the common people don't know about yet. There could be hundreds of new types of weapons not even made, but designed on a piece of paper sitting on the desk of some scientist in Washington now. Besides the physical space weapons take, they also take up space that medical scientists could be using to design a cure for AIDS or Cancer. It's also taking a way space that the U.S. could use as a jail or correctional center, because the ones we do have are overcrowded as it is now. Most of all we as a nation should be worried about ourselves over some third world country, because if we don't we might become one of those third world countries. With crimes, murders, and terrorist attacks within our own country on the rise, what's going to stop some big country like China or Germany attack at our most vulnerable moment. These are only a few reasons nuclear weapons should be banned, many more can be listed, but what's the use aren't these bad enough already.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Case Citation: Nix, Warden of the Iowa State Penitentiary v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104…
- 756 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
That is just one example of the bomb even though there was an estimated 3 made if there were to be nuclear war those the bombs alone can cause at least 5,000,000 deaths that doesn't even include hydrogen bombs, nuclear bombs ,etc. Nuclear war with these would be the most devastating war. There doesn't even have to be a war just one mistake and millions would die making that the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Also the only country that owns this is the USSR which is a communist government so if there is a war between america and the USSR they have the…
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…
- 969 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The atomic bomb is splitting atoms and creating massive energy. In result of the splitting of the atom the energy released is radiation (the atomic bomb explosion is hotter than the outer layer of the sun.) Many deaths will occur and the people will live with radiation. Now the world is exposed to a new deadly weapon just waiting for the final war battle with nuclear weapons.…
- 275 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
How could anyone possibly justify a decision that would result in over 265,000 potentially innocent people losing their lives? Justifications like this have been made throughout history by evil leaders with mal-intentions, or by psychopathic fundamentalists, but never by a governmental organization as respected and trusted as the United States. How is it possible that the most financially and socially developed country in the world is not asked to apologize for taking the lives of thousands of civilians? When reflecting on this decision made by the United States, there are a few factors worth mentioning. The first is the animosity held by the US not only against Japan but the axis powers in general, the strong desire to conclude a very painful time in world history, and the United States desire to become heroic. Although I do not know the specific thought processes and or actions that took place during this difficult time, I do have the ability to gather facts and attempt to recreate a simulation of what took place.…
- 905 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With all the money, we spend on the nuclear industry they nor the government have come up with a plan to get rid of the waste that does not involve dumping it in the ocean or the desert. McKibben states, “Congress is being lobbied really, really hard to fork over billions of dollars to the nuclear industry” (333). One thing about nuclear energy that can never be forgotten is the fact it can be turned into a weapon. The destruction nuclear weapons can cause is and always will be horrifying. During World War 2 a nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The bomb destroyed most of their island, killed most of their population, and left the country filled with radiation. Nuclear weapons can cause radiation sickness, different forms of cancer, and malformations to children ("What's the Damage?"). Even factories that use nuclear energy are harmful they destroy soil used for farming and water sources. Nuclear energy contains elements such as uranium, strontium, benzene and many others ("What's the Damage?"). These are the materials that keep nuclear energy radioactive even after it is disposed of, plus it can cause birth…
- 669 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After the atomic bomb fell on Hiroshima, about 70,000 people died in the initial blast. At the end of 1945, casualties reached over 100,000 because of radiation sickness. Five years later, casualties totaled to about 200,000 because of cancer and other diseases caused by the radiation from the blast (U.S. Department of Energy). Not only were the Japanese citizens in Hiroshima dying from the blast of the bomb, but also they were dying from radiation emitted from the bomb. The Japanese did not evacuate from Hiroshima because the effects of radiation were unknown which caused even greater deaths of Japanese citizens.…
- 1057 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…
- 276 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It wasn’t necessary to drop the bombs on Japan. It wasn’t justified for many reasons. One reason being that Japan was already on the brink of surrendering. They killed innocent people just for the sake to end a war when there could’ve been other diplomatic ways to end it. It was all immoral.…
- 577 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
August 6, 1945, a new age dawned. Technological feats were achieved that our ancestors never would thought possible in such a short period of time, on August 6 Harry S. Truman 33rd president after the death of Roosevelt the United States Airforce flew the "Enola Gay" a B-29 bomber and with its cargo of Airmen piloting, navigating, and doing their job, with them was "Little Boy" the name for the atomic bomb that was ordered to be dropped over Hiroshima, a manufacturing city, in a ploy to get the Japanese to surrender, the first bomb detonated successfully yet the Japanese Emperor Hirohito did not officially surrender until the second Atomic bomb code named " Fat Man" was dropped on Nagasaki creating a devisating mushroom cloud and killing…
- 1492 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Albert Einstein once said, “The explosive force of nuclear fission has changed everything except our modes of thinking and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe. We shall require an entirely new pattern of thinking if humankind is to survive” Albert Einstein, 1946. Nuclear weapons are arguably the most feared weapon ever created. They have the capability to end wars, nations, and even our planet if we are not careful. So, how serious is the threat of a terrorist cell acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it in an attack? Any statement containing the words ‘nuclear and weapon’ must almost always be considered serious but what is the likelihood of a successful nuclear terrorist attack occurring? The answer is anything but straight forward and many different avenues must be explored in order to better understand this current threat.…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After the US created the bomb, the US president at the time, Harry Truman ordered the mass production of more bombs, incase anyone tried to attack in the midst of their newest invention, and to give America national dominance, especially towards the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Fortunately, the amount of atomic bombs kept in arsenal has gradually decreased over the years since World War II. In 2009 nine there were 23,574 nuclear weapons and in 2014 there were 16,300. (Atomic Bomb Update). Therefore, if the world is already cutting down on atomic bombs in storage on their own is it really necessary to outlaw them?…
- 739 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Matthew Arnold uses many literary techniques to make Dover Beach such a prominent and well-known poem. By rhetorical schemes, tropes, and imagery, Arnold demonstrates a theme that can connote many different ideas. However by analyzing this poem, I interpreted Dover Beach to be about Christianity.…
- 1390 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays