Preview

How Technology Has Changed Warfare In The 1800's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Technology Has Changed Warfare In The 1800's
Throughout the many years of war there has always been a need to create new technological advancements in order to have better and more efficient ways to take on offensive and defensive approaches. During the first wars, making guns more effective was the main objective, but as wars started becoming larger scale total wars, the need for bigger equipment was crucial. One of the most significant advancements that completely changed warfare was the creation of airplanes. Man has always had the dream to fly and it was finally accomplished towards during the 1800’s with many creations like hot-air balloons, gliders, and steam driven monoplanes. By the early 1900’s the Wright brothers were able to fly the first practical airplane that could sustain …show more content…
The colonial militia was forced to stay within the confines of North America to fight against the British. The battlefield of the war had been set and there was not much the colonial men could do to change that. This war was mostly fought with swords, bayonets, cannons, mortars, and howitzers. The longest estimated range of cannons was 1,000 to 2,000 yards. It was very primitive compared to how wars are being fought now. Had they been able to extend the warfront to Britain mainland with the use of airplanes and strategic bombing similarly to how Germans did to the British in World War 2. It would have been a lot more difficult for the British to fight an at home war with the colonists and the French. Without planes, the colonist also had to rely on people to warn them about incoming enemies, which is where Paul Revere came in. The fastest reconnaissance at the time was Revere coming in on horse which bought the colonists some time at the Battle of Lexington and Concord. In the Battle of Cowpens, the British could have used the help of airplane reconnaissance to know that there would be hundreds of militiamen hiding and waiting to attack. Instead, they blindly ran across and suffered a tremendous loss that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    B 17 Characteristics

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Every major conflict the United States of America has fought in has had a defining characteristic that people identify with that era. From the Red Coats of the Revolutionary War to trench warfare of World War I, World War II also had a defining characteristic. One can make the argument that in World War II that defining characteristic was the use of aviation, most notably the bomber. One of the most iconic bombers of World War II was the B-17 Flying Fortress. This paper will explain what brought about the development of the B-17 and its inception, as well as the B-17’s role in combat and supporting ground troops. Lastly, discussed are the Memphis Belle and Old 666, two notable B-17’s from World War II.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it came to funding and domination, the British had a strong advantage over the Americans because the British had gain their funds through their Empire, and the British navy had conquered the sea, but, because the Revolution took place in America, many of the materials and supplies that the British needed took months to arrive, which was a great advantage for the Americans. During the 18th century, it was known that Britain contain the best military because they kept their soldiers well equipped, well fed and well paid, but, the American’s had a strong purpose for fighting this war, which was for freedom and liberty. Even though The Americans had trouble gaining funds to purchase supplies such as shoes and blankets for their soldiers, the…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year is 1775. The British are at war with the colonies, and unfortunately, for the colonies, a neutral observer in such a time would have picked the British for the win hands down due to their immense military strength, the colonies’ lack of metallic wealth, and the geographic fragmentation of the colonies.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The small force of American colonists won against the large British military Because Americans where fighting in their homeland, they were determined to fight and They received assistance from Europeans. than European countries and leaders greatly helped…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another advancement that was essential to a decent portion of World War Two was the airplanes. Several new airplanes were designed for the war and were a magnificent improvement compared to the planes of World War One. These new and improved planes included bombers, one of the most well known bomber planes being the…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonist didn’t just need military victories to win the war, there were some advantages to fighting on American soil. Some reasons why the colonists won was because the Atlantic ocean separated the British troops from Great Britain. There was over a 3,000 mile distance between Great Britain and their troops. The British couldn't communicate with their troops, which meant they didn’t know when they troops needed more supplies. Another issue was that Britain couldn’t supply them with more soldiers or aid when they really need it because they had to travel over sea.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These soldiers were known as the colonial militia. However, many soldiers of the British regular army believed the colonial militia consisted of low-quality soldiers who came from the scum of society. Most were sure the militia would make little difference in the outcome of the war. In reality, the soldiers of the colonial militia came from all walks of life, endured many hardships, and contributed greatly to the war effort. The ranks of the colonial militia were usually filled by average citizens. They came from all walks of life and different ethnic groups. The colonial militia utilized the use of guerrilla war tactics, which stress both deception and ambush, as opposed to mass confrontation. They used the terrain and fought in a confusing, unorganized fashion which was unheard of by the British. The colonials also used a tactics that was ‘forbidden’ in formal European warfare, the targeting of officers. Orders came from the officers, so if the officers were dead then the army would disintegrate into chaos. This is a very smart tactic on the part of the Americans. It was forbidden in European warfare because all of the officers were aristocrats expected to survive in battle. The commoners were the infantry men and they were the ones that were supposed to die. This was an outrage to the British, the deliberate disrespect the…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the American Revolution commenced there were several reasons the American colonists beat the British soldiers. First of all American colonists where in a make it break situation. The Americans would either win everything or lose everything. Not only were they fighting for their freedom, they were also fighting for their homes and families safety. Having the “home field advantage” and the skills they picked up during the war with the French gave Americans an edge that the British didn’t have.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the American Revolutionary War, Britain relied on their well-equipped, well trained, and disciplined military might to force about colonial compliance. However, despite even their superior forces, relative to the Continental Army, Britain’s perceived social attitudes of the colonies weakened their ability to properly assess the engagement with the Colonies. Instead, the British Admirals, Generals, and nobility fought a war they were familiar but most importantly comfortable with. Britain sought to end a perceived troublesome situation in a quick manner using military minds and subsequently failed to address the underlying calls for independence. Britain’s inability to quell support for independence, deprive the colonies from allied support, and failure to destroy the Continental Army negated Britain’s early victories…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many rebellions that have led to permanent changes in a group or region. The American Revolution is one of the many that has changed the course of history. For decades, historians faced the question of how the colonies manage to beat Great Britain when they were much inferior in comparison. While in most cases, historians would emphasize military strength as being one of the main reasons, most have rejected this explanation as a reason of defeating Great Britain. Instead, they have suggested that the defeat was a result of “British mistakes.” However, I agree with John Shy’s argument that the colonial militia was critical to the American victory in the Revolutionary War, as he explained in “The American Revolution: The Military Conflict Considered as a Revolutionary War.”…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ingrid Ortiz Mrs. Buice APUSH- Period 3 30 September 2014 Intro With all of the circumstances weighed, one can see that the outcome of the American Revolutionary War of 1776 inevitably tilted toward victory for the colonists. The British brought an experienced Army to bear on the Colonists; however, fighting a war across the Atlantic Ocean required supplying the army by way of the sea, a great logistical disadvantage. The Colonists, by contrast were fighting in their own backyards, and had a well-coordinated system of supply routes that made it easy to support their smaller and constantly moving army, no matter where they fought.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Continental army was not an even match to the British army, it was never as awful as the British assumed. The extreme underrating of their army served as an advantage for the American force. The British had “the best trained army and navy in the world, they were familiar with the landscape from the Seven Years’ War” and yet they still lost the Revolutionary War (Roark, 183). Because their inflow of supplies was uncertain, the British were “reluctant to pursue the Continental army aggressively” (Roark, 184). Their strategies relied on Loyalist support, and yet they did not protect their supporters.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was mainly self-sufficient, and they had the advantage of fighting on their own turf, land they were much more intimately aware of than the British. The Americans were also fighting for their freedom, their way of living. They had much more to lose than the soldiers who were simply fighting battles in a land for from their home, for the sake of a king hundreds of miles away, and therefore would be much more desperate and dogged. The colonists also chose to fight in an unconventional manner, using the land to their advantage by hiding behind rock and trees and ambushing the enemy whenever they could. But the American government was feeble and ineffectual often, and the colonies were united only in the barest sense of the word. The money provided by Congress was next to worthless, and precious basic supplies were scarce. In addition, many Americans refused to join the war, some going so far as to supply the British and greatly profit off…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For instance, some of the British strengths included physically outnumbering the colonists and their European-style tactics. With over 42,000 British soldiers and 30,000 Hessians for support, the colonists would have been crushed either way. Both sides being from Europe might have been the influence of European-style war tactics, including the Rules of War, such as capturing a capital city being the automatic victory. Moving on, the British had some weak points as well. Poor leadership made it difficult for soldiers and even common folk to keep the British cause alive, possibly leading to the defeat of the British during the Battle of Yorktown.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first thing that stuck out about the American colonies army was that they were all untrained. They all would just fire at will with little to no aim. So when it came to facing the regulars all they could do was fire into the crowd of redcoats. This would work for a little while but soon this stopped being…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays