Within this story, the royal family is given distinguishing traits that explain why the princess would choose death upon her lover. Because she is the daughter of a “semi-barbaric king” (Stockton 2), the thought of her companion getting eaten by a tiger might be more accepting than losing him to another woman. The princess’s uncivilized mind would overrule the appropriate decision, and choose the tiger.…
As stated before the author Yann Martel has an ironic association with Piscine. Piscine is the guy with the amazing story and Yann Martel is the author seeking an extraordinary story. The duo was a match meant to be, the fact that they meet was perfect. Piscine could share his story with the world and Yann Martel had a chance to redeem himself after his last book…
There is a certain method humans deal with stress-inducing situations. Pi created a fictitious mask that saw the horrendous acts of man in a better light in order to carry on with his day-to-day life. A cover-up of good faith to preserve the bits of good humanity that left in Pi’s life. In Pi’s alternate story, the one without the animals, there was a malevolent chef that operated in unconventional ways. The chef was pure evil, murdering a Chinese sailor to settle his hunger. These violent actions are parallel to the work of the hyena in Pi’s main story, the one with animals. The hyena eventually ate and killed the zebra, a fellow animal, for its hunger got the better of him. For the hyena, indigestion of one’s own species does not invokes…
Because of the lion’s dangerous actions, the villagers had to alter their society and be scared of the “beast”. The cause and effect makes the lion appear to be a figure of terror; not an affectionate creature. Next, Goodwell Nzou supports his second claim by asserting that Americans are hypocritical because they are doing things that are similar to trophy hunting in their own country. He uses an anaphora to appeal to logos when stating, “Don’t tell us what to do with out animals when you allowed your own mountain lions to be hunted to near extinction in the eastern United States. Don’t bemoan the clear-cutting of our forests when you turned yours into concrete jungles” (Nzou). For this claim, the author uses the anaphora to repeat “don’t” to emphasize the fact that Americans should not be criticizing Africans for the killing of Cecil when they do just as much harm to their own country. The readers can clearly see what the Americans are doing to their societies, and begin to wonder if they support the ban for trophy…
Ever read the stunning story, “The Lady or the Tiger?” Frank Stockton (the author) is an amazing writer. He has an incredibly unique style of writing. Throughout the story, the Stockton does an amazing job at drawing the reader into the story. As the reader gets closer and closer to the end of the story, he/she is drooling to know what comes out of the door. Was it the lady or the tiger? However, in the end, the author leaves it up to decision as to what appears from behind the door; therefore, the question still remains: did the lady, or the tiger some out from behind the door? The answer is clear to see, the tiger was beyond the door. To begin, in the story the princess was described as semi-barbaric. Because that…
Furthermore, the princess was the jealous type, so she would choose the door with the tiger for her lover’s fate. This barbaric princess was jealous at the thought of her man being with another woman; for it was the. . . “Hot- blooded, semi- barbaric moiety that made her soul at white heat beneath all her…
people. She uses animals in the story to show us how our actions (or lack of…
This thematic element is used abundantly but only a few will be described. First, he explains the differences in fighting. He says, "The higher animals engage in individual fights, but never in organized masses." (1250). He again dips into violence which was spoken about in the previous paragraph. But now he tries to show the difference between the two types of animals. Next, he experiments with the higher animals by putting them in cages. He had read about an eral that "killed seventy-two of those great animals" (1248) and "left the seventy-one to rot." (1248). Then he decided to observe the differences between eral and an anaconda. He says, "I caused seven young calves to be turned into the anaconda 's cage" (1249) and it "crushed one of them and swallowed it, then lay back satisfied." (1249). This illustrates how animals only kill for needs, but humans kill for no apparent reason. Lastly, he continues with the theme of the cage. He says, "In the course of two days I was able to ad a fox, a goose, a squirrel, and some doves. Finally a monkey. They lived together in a peace; even affectionately." (1251). He then put various lower animals in another cage to observe the differences. He put, "A Turk from Constantinople; a Greek Christian from Crete; an Armenian; a Methodist from the wilds of Arkansas; a Buddhist from China; a Brahman from Benares." (1251). He came back two…
I’m a regular newspaper reader. Recently I stumbled upon Jeremy Clarkson’s article about tigers. Upon reading it I discovered that I strongly disagree with some of his ideas and points of view and the way in which he writes them. On a personal level I am also fond of these wild animals, which gives me reasons to criticise this article.…
2. What does Singer mean by saying that all animals are equal? What does he mean by "speciesism," and how is it like racism and sexism?…
Why does the author decide to portray people of different races and nationalities as different animals?…
In “An Elephant Crackup?”, Charles Siebert partly attributes the belligerence of the recent generations of elephants, the animals considered to be among the most intelligently advanced, to the lack of a matriarch, a powerful female figure. He takes an example of the case of the last elephant survivors at Queen Elizabeth National Park, where the elderly female elephant was the one who “gathered the survivors together from their various hideouts”, “led them back out as one group”, and “held the group together [as] the population all the while slowly beginning to rebound” (Siebert 358). The idea that the sustainability of the group is dependent on its leading female is rather surprising, in the sense that in the wilderness, where the determination of roles among the members of the herds is largely, or even solely, influenced by physical ability, it would be more logical that the males are in control. Surprisingly, there are several researches that prove the opposite, that despite lacking physical advantage, female leaders are vital to the behavior and existence of the group itself. This phenomenon is not only interesting, but also very useful and fundamental to the effort of improving the aggression of the elephants, and through that, the relationship between elephants and humans. Also, there are certain ways that the “political” and social order of the matriarchal societies in elephant can be held accountable for the sake of this process.…
Assignment 3: Analyzing and Interpreting Texts For this assignment we read the stories Evil Robot Monkey (Kowal, Mary Robinette, Evil Robot Monkey), and The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees (Yu, E. Lily, The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees). These stories use animals as the main characters and they show a piece of the human psyche, that would change if the stories used humans instead of the animals. While Evil Robot Monkey is as close to using human characters as The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees does. For this assignment we will start with an analysis of Evil Robot Monkey.…
William Blake used the image of animals to reflect the behavior of society. Usually animals are seen as fierce and pure, they live through the the law of retaliation : the strongest will live. But here the animals are personified. Notice that every time an animal is mentioned, the first letter of the word is capitalized, “Wolfs & Lions’’ or “Horse’’, as if they are human beings (Blake 19, 11) . They only fight to survive. Like the philosopher Aristote said :“ man is a political animal’’. When an animal is depict, the animal is suffering like “A Skylark wounded in the wing’’ or “ A dog starvd at his Masters Gate’’ (Blake 15, 9).…
Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers that does not represent Rich herself as she wrote it as a young woman, but it does represent women at that time. In this poem Rich presents us with the ‘typical marriage’ at that time where women felt constricted by their marriage and felt it was a burden weighing them down ‘The massive weight of Uncle’s wedding band/Sits heavily upon Aunt Jennifer’s hand.’ Aunt Jennifer was feeling oppressed and afraid ,’her terrified hands’ because her husband was the one who had power over her and the one who made the important decisions making Aunt Jennifer feel insignificant ‘Still ringed with the ordeals she was mastered by.’ Yet the tigers she created have no fear of the human beings and perhaps this was Aunt Jennifer’s desire ,not to fear ‘the men beneath the tree.’ Rich I believe choose the tigers as the symbol of power and freedom to especially show what Aunt Jennifer was thinking deep within and the contrast between Aunt Jennifer and her creation ,the tigers. I believe there is a hope and a wish that the way women are seen will change for future generation ,this is shown at the end of the poem ‘The tigers in the panel that she made/ Will go on prancing ,proud and unafraid.’…