Anthony Clary Liberty University
HSCO 500
Dr. Alicia Adkins
September 29, 2013
Abstract
Evidence has shown that teen homeless across America is ongoing and impacts youth of all cultures and backgrounds. There are millions of youth that are homeless in the United States. The typical ages of homeless youth are eighteen and younger. In America the average youth becomes homeless by age fourteen (www.safehorizon.com). Youth can become homeless for a number of reasons e.g. finances, verbal and physical abuse, pregnancy, sexual orientation, mental illness and neglect. Many youth and young adults have also become homeless due to aging out of foster care services. Youth exiting the foster care and juvenile penal system aren’t effectively linked to services to prevent homelessness. “Surveys of service providers and homeless populations suggest that young people exiting foster care have difficulty securing stable housing,” (Fowler, Toro, & Miles, pg. 1453, 2009). Homelessness is often frowned upon and observed as an individual issue; however, this is the society’s issue, affecting everyone. Research has shown that joining together with a common goal in mind can produce promising results, so why not teen homelessness? “Through strategic collaborations between the nonprofit, private, and public sectors, it is possible to develop more innovative approaches to housing homeless youth,” (Van Leeuwen, pg. 466, 2003). Envisioned for this work, the writer will provide evidence from empirical articles on teen homeless and its effects as they directly impact our country.
Introduction
Teen homelessness happens to affect all people of different nations, ages, states, and cultures. Teen homelessness and homelessness can be defined in several different ways. The homeless and runaway act of 1974 (RHYA) described homeless youth as one who is no older than 21 and is unaccompanied by a family
References: Giffords, E., Alonso, C., & Bell, R. (2007). A Transitional Living Program for Homeless Adolescents: A Case Study. Child & Youth Care Forum, 36(4), 141-151. doi:10.1007/s10566-007-9036-0 Lowe Jr., W Yoder, K. A., Whitbeck, L. B., & Hoyt, D. R. (2003). Gang involvement and membership among homeless and runaway youth.Youth and Society, 34(4), 441-467. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/226982269?accountid=12085 Barrow, S Hobden, K., Curtis Forney, J., Wyszacki Durham, K., & Toro, P. (2011). Limiting attrition in longitudinal research on homeless adolescents: what works best?. Journal Of Community Psychology, 39(4), 443-451. doi:10.1002/jcop.20445 Fowler, P Corcoran, M. P. (2005). Portrait of the 'absent ' father: the impact of non-residency on developing and maintaining a fathering role. Irish Journal of Sociology, 14(2), 134-154. van Leeuwen, J. (2004). Reaching the Hard to Reach: Innovative Housing for Homeless Youth Through Strategic Partnerships. Child Welfare, 83(5), 453-468. Freeman, R., Abel, D., Cowper-Smith, M., & Stein, L. (2004). Reconnecting Children With Absent Parents. Family Court Review, 42(3), 439-459. Liu, S. H., & Heiland, F. (2012). Should We Get Married? The Effect of Parents ' Marriage on out-of-wedlock children. Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 17-38. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00248.x Rhule-Louie, D., Bowen, S., Baer, J., & Peterson, P Hill, R. B. (1998). Understanding Black Family Functioning: A Holistic Perspective. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies, 29(1), 15-25.