Preview

HSM 542 Week 5 You Decide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
HSM 542 Week 5 You Decide
For the past six months, Lydia, who is paralyzed from a car accident and can only communicate through nodding her head, has been receiving life sustaining support from the staff at Little Falls Hospital. It is uncertain if Lydia is able to understand any information about her current situation and is able to make any decisions for herself. Lydia prepared an advance directive before the accident, but the advance directive cannot be located.
There are two laws that can be taken into account for this situation, the New York Health Care Proxy Law and the New York’s Family Health Care Decision Making Act (FHCDA). Under the New York Health Care Proxy Law, Lydia’s husband, Mr. Bevins, who is her legal guardian, which also makes him the surrogate decision maker under the New York Health Care Proxy Law, has the legal right to make the decisions on her health care in her behalf. Being respectful of his wife’s wishes, Mr. Bevins is asking that the life sustaining support be withdrawn. However, Lydia’s mom, Eileen Redfield, believes that her daughter has a chance to recover and does not support Mr. Bevins’ decision.
New York’s Family Health Care Decision Making Act (FHCDA) “establishes the authority of a patient’s family member or close friend to make health care decisions for the patient in cases where the patient lacks decisional capacity and did not leave prior instructions or appoint a health care agent. This “surrogate” decision maker would also be empowered to direct the withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment when standards set forth in the statute are satisfied.” (http://www.nysba.org/Content/NavigationMenu/PublicResources/FamilyHealthCareDecisionsActInformationCenter/FHCDARC.htm) With Mr. Bevins being the appointed guardian, it gives him the right to make the decisions on his wife’s behalf. Since there is uncertainty as to whether Lydia can make her own decisions, the doctors would have to confirm that Lydia is no longer capable of making

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mis589 Week 2 You Decide

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After conducting interviews with the key stakeholders at the Leonard Cooper Charter School, we have identified several issues with the current network that need to be addressed. According to Network Technician, Helen Ross printing is a problematic area. The school currently has over 50 networked printers in the building and they would like a way to consolidate the management of print jobs due to the queues of the printers often being filled.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hrm/531 Week 4

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This assignment is based on an Earned Value analysis performed by a cost account manager, who has received a variance report (given below) from a performance measurement system. I have calculated the appropriate variances and included corrective measures for each of them.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Procedural History: Mr. Schiavo requested the guardianship court to permit him to end the life-prolonging procedures that were supporting his wife, who was in a persistent vegetative state. Theresa Schiavo’s parents, Robert and Mary Schindler, opposed the motion and brought the case in to trial. After the court granted Mr. Schiavo to end the life-prolonging procedures, the case was brought to the appellate level which affirmed the decision. Although the guardianship court’s order was affirmed during the appeal, allowing Mr. Schiavo to stop the procedures, the litigation continued because Mr. and Ms. Schindler’s filed a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Civil Procedure and in civil division of the circuit court. The Second District agreed to review the evidence but ultimately affirmed the guardianship court’s decision in the end and gave Mr. Schiavo permission to remove Theresa’s nutrition tubes. However, six days later, under the Legislative enactment, Governor Bush sigh the Act of the Legislative into law and ordered Theresa Schiavo to continue staying on nutrition…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsm 542 You Decide Week 4

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the CFO of Marysville General Hospital, I realize we have a serious accounts receivable problem here. It has gotten out of control, and we are going to get it back in control. All it takes is a little effort from everyone to get us back on here. With the process improvement plan I am proposing, I will need the assistance and cooperation of the medical staff, the clinical departments, the business office, health information management, and all other departments.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSM 542 Week 2 You Decide

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Margie Wilson, a 95 year old woman and patient at Golden Oaks Rehabilitation Center located on the grounds of Marion General Hospital, is dealing with some difficult times after losing her son, Williams, this past week. Within the past five years, she has also had to deal with the passing of her husband of 68 years, Earl, and another son who died in a motor vehicle accident, Jacob.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hrm/531 Week 3

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Consider the situation where you are working under contract for another organization. If you are given a set of project specifications (detailed requirements), to what degree should you attempt to understand the needs behind these requirements before or after starting the project?…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When a patient is unable to make decisions for himself or herself, their caregivers and those who know them are appointed to make the decisions based on what the patient would have wanted. This is called surrogate decision making. According to the article Terri Schiavo and End-of-Life Decisions “when surrogate decision makers and caregivers cannot agree upon what that choice would have been, they may turn to the courts to determine either what the now-incapacitated patient would have chosen or who is best suited to choose as the patient would have” (Mathes, 2005)…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hrm542 Week 2 You Decide

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The dilemma is that Mrs. Margie Whitson a patient at Golden Oaks Rehabilitation Center is going through some very hard times after just loosing her son William about a week ago. She has also had to deal with loosing her husband in the past 5 years leading up to this. She is also reflecting back to when she lost her first son to a motor vehicle accident. Margie is having a very difficult time taking this all in and now feels all alone and wants the one and only thing keeping her alive removed. Margie suffered a heart attack 2 years ago that almost took her life and she had to have an electronic pacemaker implanted. The pacemaker is what is keeping her alive by keeping her heart rhythm at a 100% pace. Without the pacemaker she would not be able to live. Now that all of her family is gone she is requesting that her pacemaker be removed so that she can pass and go on to be with her family because she now feels like she has nothing to live for anymore. She has talked to the Rehabilitation Center Administrator Cindy Mackin and has told her what she wants to happen and has requested her to call Dr. Vijay who was the Cardiologist Surgeon who placed the pacemaker in her to remove it.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debate Hcs 478

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Decisions about LSTs are taken away from the family only if it is unclear as to who should be the family surrogate or if the appointed family surrogate has a conflict of interest and may be unable to act in the patient 's behalf. So when Michael Schiavo was received the million dollars from the malpractice suit, he was unable to act in Terri’s best interests. When this happens, a guardian ad litem is appointed by the court. Normally, these decisions are kept in the clinical area and out of the courts hands. During the malpractice suit in 1992, Michael made no mention of his wife’s alleged wish to die and conversely pleaded for the opportunity to personally take care of his wife at home for the rest of his life. He sought $20 million to cover the cost of her future medical and neurological care, estimating her life expectancy to be 50 years. (Lynne, 2005). This life ending debate was a decision based purely on greed and money. Michael did not take Terri’s wishes into consideration, her ability to breathe and smile on her own, nor her religious beliefs. He simply ended her life based upon his desire to move on with someone else and the money he won off of Terri’s misfortune.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    deployment flow chart

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Priority care needs of the family. It is vital that they contact Lilly’s husband Tom because they need consent from him and have to keep him informed of the wife’s situation. The organization has to communicate the patient’s treatment plan to the spouse just in case Lilly is…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An ethical dilemma exists when the right thing to do is not clear or when members of the health care team cannot agree on the right thing to do (Potter, Perry, Stockert, & Hall, 2011). S.Z. is a 65-year-old Hispanic man who was admitted to the hospital for the third time in 6 months, for hyperglycemia. He is now scheduled to be discharged but his daughter pleads with the nurse that she does not want her father discharged because he is non-complaint with his medications and diet at home. She says she has small children at home and can’t be responsible for him, too. She is worried sick that he is doing this on purpose because he has been so depressed since her mother, who did everything for him, passed away. She says that her father has been seeing a curanderos, who treats him with traditional methods and that he refuses to take his medicine and only follows what the curanderos tells him to do. She does not agree with this and confides that she hopes to find a way to prevent her father from seeing this person and wants to know if the nurse can have her father’s discharge canceled and to ask the doctor to admit him to a nursing home where they can ensure he eats right and takes his medicine and not the herbs he has been using. Then she pleads, “Please just tell the doctor he won’t take his medicine.” Many years ago he was diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus Type II and has been on insulin for two years. His blood sugar on admission was 589. He is retired and was widowed one year ago. He’s active in his church, gardens, and likes to work on small projects around the house. His medical history includes Diabetes Mellitus Type II, insulin dependent, Hyperlipidemia, and Osteoarthritis.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Feeding Tube

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All patient’s in the United States have all been equal to one right. The Patient’s Bill of Rights apply to this situation because an individual has the right to make their own decisions as long as they have the right mind and is fully competent. The Patient Bill of Rights is simply a statement that entitles the patient to medical care. A statement that articulates the rights in which the doctors and hospitals ought to provide patients, thereby providing information, offering fair treatment, and granting them autonomy over medical decisions. There are six values that are commonly applied to medical ethics (Showalter, 2010). The Bill of Rights include: the right to exercise the freedom of speech, to practice religion, be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, bear arms in an organized militia, demand a jury trial, to be protected against self- incrimination and be accordance substantive and procedural due process of the law. This also applies to June because she has the right to choose her own path in life. In this case, June is suffering from a dangerous disease.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Texas woman is now brain-dead after collapsing on her kitchen floor in November from what appeared to be a blood clot in her lungs. She was found by her husband and taking to the John Peter Smith Hospital. Marlise Munoz was also 14 weeks pregnant. At the hospital she was in Intensive care unit where she remains connected to live-support. Her husband and parents planed to take her off life support. In November as they plan to say there goodbyes and to fulfill her wish not to be left on life support, her family finds out that the doctor is not willing to comply with their instructions. She was 14 weeks pregnant and the state of Texas prohibit, with varying degrees of strictness, medical officials from cutting off life support to a pregnant patient.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A patient can lose his competence permanently or temporarily. In such cases, it is the family members, close relatives, or other close persons who take the decision on behalf of the patient. This is simply called surrogate decision making. Surrogate decision making needs to follow some specific norms and process in a certain framework as has been described by Brock (1991). The first thing to consider in this regard is whether the patient has any advance directive. An advance directive is a legally written statement related to the patient's choice on who should determine the treatment process if the patient becomes incompetent of decision making. But many states do not consider such directives. Moreover, such living wills have certain limitation. Because they often fail to make a way through an ambiguous situation that needs reasoning. The will describes the patient's wish, but it needs analytical consideration. The second condition of this framework comes to action when there are no advance…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this case, the three important ethical issues to consider are ethical distress, ethical dilemma, and locus of control. I believe that ethical distress is one of the main ethical issues in this case since the patient desires to remain on a ventilator to avoid losing her life. She makes it very clear to the staff that she wants to live by interacting with them and answering “no” when asked if she wants the tubes to be removed. On the other hand, her primary care physician along with two of her close friends insists that she’d be taken off the ventilator. They believe that she is currently confused, and that she would have never agreed to remain in that situation if she was aware of it. An ethical dilemma is also present when the critical care team believes that beneficence is the right choice, while the patient’s primary care physician believes in autonomy based on the patient’s original will. A locus of control is also seen in this case since the primary care physician is the one in control of the situation. While the critical care unit along with the neurologist believe that the patient has the potential to recover from her state, the primary care physician with support from the psychiatrist try everything to comply with the patient’s will. He ended up transferring the patient to another hospital in order to be able to comply with the will since the critical care team would not allow him to do so.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays