Preview

Hugo Chavez Hybrid Regime

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1608 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hugo Chavez Hybrid Regime
In order to understand the democratic state of Venezuela it is essential to understand the workings of Hugo Chavez and what is considered a hybrid regime. Hybrid regimes are political systems in which the tools for determining access to state office combines both democratic and autocratic practices. In other words, in hybrid regimes, freedom exists and the opposition is allowed to compete in election, but the system of checks and balances has become inoperative (Corrales 1). Hybrid regimes typically display the following features as well: government negotiations with opposition forces are rare, hardcore loyalists are given benefits and placed at top level government positions (which further undermines the system of checks and balances), the …show more content…
The key changes took place between 1999-2001 directly before the 2003-2008 oil boom (Corrales 14). Chavez started by creating a hyper presidential constitution. Shortly after Chavez took office the 1961 constitution was rewritten and gave substantially more power to the executive. He focused on rewriting the rules governing relations among the branches of government, with a profound focus on expanding the presidential powers. The constitution was also written in just 3 months and lacked input from the opposition, which was yet another tactic to expand presidential power. Furthermore, the presidential term was expanded from 5 years to 6 years and immediate reelection for a second term was granted. The president was also given complete control over promotions within the armed forces without legislative approval, the senate was eliminated which got rid of checks and balances within Congress and between the legislative and executive branch, the president was allowed to activate any kind of referendum without legislative action, and public financing for political parties was banned (Corrales 19). A constitution that allows for so much executive power is hard to fathom in a democratic atmosphere. In fact, separation of power and the voice of the opposition are key factors in a democratic system. This constitution produced a system in which the stakes of holding power were very high and the incentive for incumbents to give up the power was very low (Corrales

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq Essay

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The nineteenth and early twentieth century are characterized as a “Legislative Epoch” because the country was deemed as a Congressional government and the president was seen simply as someone who implemented the will of Congress. There was very little reign from the president and they were left with very little to enforce their personal national and social agendas. National conventions, which were huge meetings held by political parties once they’ve selected a presidential candidate, began to rise in the 1830s. This strengthened the executive branch because whoever was elected, had a large support group from their political party. Congress however, remained to keep a tight reign over the president to make sure their powers did not over step the Constitution. The administration of Franklin Roosevelt was the transformation to today’s modern presidency. In his first 100 days in office, he took control of the executive branch and promoted certain policies to Congress. This transformed the size of the national government in America. His newly passed programs were unseen before and intervened in the American economy and the challenged the traditional balance of power in federalism and the separation of powers. One of his most famous programs was The New Deal, which took quick action to expand the role of the national government. FDR had an especially…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the articles there was no president of the country, and they did not give Congress the power to regulate foreign or interstate commerce. They also did not give the power to tax, during the first two years under the Articles Congress received less than $1.5 million of the $10 million in taxes requested from the states. There also was no federal court system to settle disputes between the states, this alone meant that any state could veto another state in disagreement.…

    • 609 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution was enacted to replace it on 1788. Sovereignty of states no longer existed as the Constitution became the supreme law of the land that everyone had to abide by. The only thing that the Constitution had in common with the Articles of Confederation was that they were written by the same people, the same delegates that formed the Second Continental Congress. The fear of tyranny no longer overcame the Framers of the Constitution as they established a strong central government. There were three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judiciary, with a system of checks and balances so that one branch cannot accumulate power. There was also a bicameral legislature: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Whereas the Articles could only request states to pay taxes, Constitution had the right to levy taxes. There was also a court system created to handle disputes. Congress became from powerless to a very important part of government as it gained rights to regulate trade/commerce and raise an army. Prior to the Constitution, each state received 1 vote, but Constitution changed that so that Senate received 2 votes and the number of votes the House of Representatives received were based on the population of that state. Unanimous consent was now required to ratify new laws, and amendment of the Constitution required the consent of three-fourths of all states. The Articles of Confederation were also much less organized in that states were given the right to coin money, which caused problems when currency from one state mixed with that of another. The Constitution fixed this issue so that only United States had the right to coin money. Another example of the disorganization of the Articles was that the term to be in legislative office was only one year, but with the Constitution, it was 2 years for Representatives and 6 years for Senates. Members were now elected by popular vote,…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How much power would the United States government have under the Constitution if it was ratified? Today, United States citizens have a grasp on the role the government has, the role of the individual in that government, and the system of checks and balances in place so as no one entity would gain increasing power over the other, or no tyrannical ruler can rise up and take control. However, during the Constitution’s ratification, many men viewed the Constitution as being troublesome, allowing for too much presidential power, an out of control judiciary, and a government far and away from dealing with the problems and needs of each region. A party led by Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of the Constitution and were in favor of a revised…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, the government could raise taxes if they want for important reasons like maybe to financially aid the army, and build new business'. The reason why we need these powers are because, if the government was not able to raise or enforce taxes, then the people would not even bother to pay their taxes, without that tax money the government would go into decline and they wouldn't be able financially aid an army for our Nation. They were also allowed to establish bankruptcy laws. Also, they could establish lower courts for the smaller towns in the states. This means that the smaller states would have their own courts assigned by the Constitution.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This new document had a 3 branched federal system. The Congress was divided into the House of Representatives and the Senate. They appointed a federal judiciary called the Supreme Court. The executive branch (the President) would be elected by the people. This created a separation of powers called checks and balances. In checks and balances the President nominated the judges, but the Supreme Court could declare the presidents acts unconstitutional. The President can veto congressional legislation, but the Congress could veto the presidents laws and can impeach him from office. Congress confirm the President’s nomination’s to the Supreme Court and can impeach judges from the Court; The Supreme Court however, can declare any of Congress’ acts unconstitutional. This new government could tax, regulate commerce, and create general “umbrella” laws as guidelines for the states. The states would then add specific laws that were legal underneath those “umbrella laws”. There were still flaws however, there was no Bill of Rights in the original…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The battle of Chavez valley was a clear demonstration of how two different and somewhat contradictory theories can complement each other to explain a decade-long fight that was lost by the rightful owners. It also explains how a collaboration between the trade, production and their connection with the law, government, custom and distribution of the national wealth and income destroyed an ideology it was supposed to…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hugo Chavez Imperialism

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “The grand destroyer of the world and the greatest thread is represented by the US imperialism”-Hugo Chavez 2007. Many people have to know Chavez by his great dislike of the United States of America. He took every opportunity he had to announce his great dislike for this nation. In one instance in 2006, as he was speaking in the U.N. General Assembly he said “Yesterday, the devil came here. Right here. Right here. And it smells of sulfur still today, this table that I am now standing in front of.” (Washington Post) He had been referring to President George W. Bush, who had spoken in the same place a day prior Chavez. He spent a considerable time, during that assembly, attacking the United States and stating that the president felt as if he…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson DBQ

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * In a way it gave more Americans an opportunity to participate in government and get rid of the corruption in the system.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution fixed many problems dealt with prior to the Constitutional Convention. First of all, a system of checks and balances was put in place for the three separate branches of Government. The Judicial Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Executive Branch. The Judicial Branch is made up of the Supreme Court and other Federal Courts. The Legislative Branch is made up of the House and Senate, and is Congress. The Executive Branch is made up of the President, and it passes laws, or Executes them. Checks and balances was created so no branch could become more powerful than the other(s). This system is described in Document 6; “Executive Branch… Can veto, or refuse to sign laws… Legislative Branch… Can override veto of the President…” This is also described in Document 7; “Judicial Branch… Can declare laws unconstitutional…” The list goes on about how each branch checks on each other. This is helpful because it ensures that every section of Government is just as important as the others. Another change with the Articles of Confederation was that Congress was given the power to tax. This is mentioned in Document 1; “Congress given the power to tax.” Also mentioned in Document 1; “Only the National Government has the power to coin money.” Now that Congress can tax the people, they can raise an army and pay for other things they couldn't…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some of the major differences of the Constitution that strengthened the old Articles were: the Congress was divided into the House of Representatives and the Senate; each state had two Senators, and the amount of Representatives was chosen according to the state 's population; the terms for legislative office terms were lengthened; congressional pay was paid by the federal government, not states. America now had one executive president, amendment was agreed upon by three fourths of all states, the United States coined money as a nation instead of by individual states, taxes were laid and collected by Congress not by individual states, and ratification only needed the consent of nine…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People were getting high up jobs in government solely based on the fact that they had connections. This led to the inexperienced people being bought out and swayed to certain sides that shouldn’t be in power. All of this corruption led to poorly managed cities, overtly lackadaisical regulation of business and the economy. The effects of these issues were so widespread that huge amounts of people began calling for reforms. Joseph L. Bristow a republican senator from Kansas proposed the final draft of an amendment to require all senators to be elected by popular vote.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress was also weak, with members being elected annually as well as a need for 2/3 vote to settle important issues and unanimous vote was needed to make amendment to the Articles, solutions to problems was hard to come by. Congress also could not raise a military. Congress could not collect tax either because it couldn’t force the stated to give it to them causing a decline in revenue.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Vs Federalism

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A feature of the original Constitution that led to the growth in power of the national government is the necessary and proper clause. This section of the Constitution gives congress the power to make any laws they consider necessary to perform their duties, which has allowed the power of national government to expand over the years. Another feature that had this effect was the vagueness of the presidential power in the Constitution. The President was in charge of the executive branch and had the power of the…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hugo Chavez who was president from 1999-2013 and his successor Nicolas Maduro, who shared very similar views, sequentially led Venezuela into “The Crisis”. Chavez and Maduro proposed a socialist revolution which is what rallied a majority of citizens behind them in support. However, they did not fulfill their promises. The people of Venezuela believed corruption was their number one problem and the cause of other problems in their country. Also, their confidence in their traditional two-party political establishment significantly declined.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays