BIO/100
November 17, 2010
Graves
Capstone Checkpoint Human encroachment of regions is a major problem and the human race can take steps in order to preserve these regions. There are so many ecosystems being destroyed in order for building to occur. Woods are being bulldozed in preparation for malls, grocery stores or schools. People could play a role in preserving regions by signing petitions or going to town meetings and speaking up. Species have no voice and the human population has to step up and be their voice. Human encroachment can have its benefits but it can also have its disasters that can result in the loss of species. Take the drilling in the Artic; some argue it can potentially cause an oil spill like the spill that happened off the Gulf of Mexico. If environmentalists are correct, oil spilling will cost millions of dollars to cleanup as well as a hazard to people and species. However, the Obama administration plans to move forwards. In order to create a balance among the competing groups, the ones in favor should make sure there is a plan set into place to quickly fix any problem. Also there needs to be a need for the drilling that goes beyond money. The long-term effects need to be considered and if it seems the drilling would be beneficial to the human population, then those that oppose should have confidence that animals or the area will not be harmed. Although countries are divided, the earth is not. When one part of the earth is being destroyed, it can affect the entire area. International conservation groups encourage natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable in other countries (IUCN, 2011). That is just it, organizations can encourage and give as much information possible about the effects of destroying a jungle, but intervening could cause a war between countries. That is why there are leaders of countries, they are who make decisions for their country.
Reference
IUCN. (2011, November 15). About IUCN. Retrieved from http://iucn.org/
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In his piece, Dwight R. Lee explains that with oil drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, there would be many benefits as compared to the cost. He doesn’t deny that there would be risks associated with the drilling. However, he feels that they do not begin to compare to the benefits. He explains that the main reason that this has become such a hot topic is because of the high prices of gasoline and oil. One company that he looks at is the National Audubon Society. They are against opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling because they feel that it will “destroy the integrity.” This is the same company that owns the 26,000 acre Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary and opens it to drilling. By allowing this drilling, the Audubon Society has received more than $25 million. This has allowed them to own other wildlife and wilderness land.…
- 587 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States had great choice to make this past month in the Presidential Elections. The decision was to continue on our current path or start on a new one. A major point on the two candidates was on the domestic economic policies. Issues on the domestic economic policies were very different for both tickets in this year’s election. Differences were very clear on each party’s stances on drilling on Federal Land. Romney was very adamant on increasing drilling on Federal Land and also creating the much controversial Keystone XL Pipeline. During Obama’s first term, production of natural gas on the United States Federal Land has decreased from 35% to 21%. Though, his dismay of drilling has come after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in which millions of barrels of oil polluted vast areas in the Gulf of Mexico. This trend will be continuing, unless progress is made to ensure the safety of the environment while drilling. This is a main concern for the government, especially on domestic Federal Land.…
- 830 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…
- 2026 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
There are several reasons why drilling should not be allowed in ANWR. One reason is that animals are on the brink of endangerment and extinction. Not talking about the ANWR animals…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
preserve and take care of this great natural resource. Lets begin with the Wildlife, with the…
- 891 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In recent discussions of drilling in the arctic national refuge, a controversial issue has been whether to drill or not to drill. On the one hand, some argue that drilling for oil can bring many benefits both economically and politically to America, it creates jobs and makes us less dependent on foreign oil. Also in the last two decades their have been many laws to improve the drilling, transport and clean up of oil. We as Americans have a comfortable lifestyle. A large part of which comes from using natural resources. There are a lot of reasons why earth conscious people would want to prevent oil drilling in an area that is protected called The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Spills are probably the first thing on anyone’s mind when they talk about oil drilling and transportation. So why would anyone, besides greedy, millionaire oil company executives, want to drill and transport oil? Drilling for oil can bring many benefits, both economically and politically, to America. It creates jobs and can make us less dependent on foreign oil. Also, in the last two decades there have been many laws and reforms to improve the drilling, transport, and cleanup of oil. These insure a greatly reduce possibility of harmful contamination to the Earth as a whole.…
- 4979 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Restore the damage we have done the past and by planting more trees and recylcing. Encouraging people to live in a safier environment. Establish more state parks that protect our rainforests and wildlife. Last but no least is to support copanies that do less damage to the environment.…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
For years there has been an environmental debate on whether oil drilling should begin in the largest refuge in the United States, Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR]. High potential for oil within the refuge is estimated but the environmental impacts of oil drilling is harmful and destructive. Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge has pros and cons, however, cons are more significant as it deals with the environment and animals rather than politics and the economy. Pollution is a major consequence of oil drilling, oil spills are also a critical concern that would be devastating to the environment and the animals. Another major concern is climate change as an effect of pollution. The refuge provides a habitat in which…
- 267 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One issue that I can relate to and understand is the overdevelopment. Many real estate developers are destroying the land around and possibly affecting the water too. Salt marshes and mangrove swamps are examples of coastal habitats being damaged. I see these builders over building and have not care for the negative impact it will have on our water resources. We as humans and as creatures of mother earth have an obligation to take care of what limited resources we have. It is apparent today that the more we build and over populate, we will destroy the natural resources and create long term problems. Just imagining the materials and debris being set forth around the real estate is being developed is utterly disturbing. These real estate developments…
- 376 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It was not until recently that I have become passionate about my future as a community planner. One of the issues I intend to address as a planner is environmental injustice, the disproportionate placement of minority groups in highly-polluted and environmentally degraded areas. Another issue of utmost importance to me is how to protect native species from habitat loss – and ultimately extinction – as humanity advances.…
- 1815 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
The most important task in human history has been to find a way of extracting from the ecosystems in which people have lived, enough resources for maintaining life … the problem has been to balance their various demands against the ability of the ecosystems to withstand the resulting pressures. [Ponting 1991, p17]…
- 3271 Words
- 14 Pages
Powerful Essays -
America’s rank as the world’s leading superpower gives the nation unsurpassed clout throughout the rest of the world, but as the old saying goes “With great power comes great responsibility.” Many other nations not only rely on America’s economy for their own country’s survival, but they also look up to America with a hopeful sense for the future. The founding fathers of this great nation had excellent insight into the authority that America would one day possess, and thus they attempted to set many precedents that would lead the way for the nations that would choose to follow America’s example. Still today, every move that the American nation makes is carefully scrutinized by the other nations of the world. So, it is crucial that the United States ensure that as it moves forward, it does so with a noble and future oriented perception of its goals. Thus, drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve would be a colossal mistake for the United States, because drilling would be detrimental to the pristine indigenous environment, it would have little or no beneficial impact on the American or Global economy, and would poorly exemplify the ambitions that America should have.…
- 919 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In his speech “Why Wilderness?”, Roderick Frazier Nash uses his power of persuasion, knowledge, and personal belief to convey how essential our wilderness is. He is trying to accomplish two things; persuading the reader that wilderness is important enough to put forth an effort into preserving it, and present to the (already pro-wilderness) audience how he believes they should do so. By contrasting the past and present of our wilderness and what we have and haven’t done to keep it, Nash suggests that we are not currently on the correct path. Nash does an excellent job of proving to the reader and the audience that change is in order without bombarding them with negativity.…
- 817 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The president opposing this idea from the last few years is Barack Obama. He thought that the drilling would permanently…
- 602 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays