Preview

An Argument Against Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Argument Against Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve
An Argument against Drilling in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve
By: James Andrew Whitten

Government Economics
Heath Vincent
March 5, 2013

America’s rank as the world’s leading superpower gives the nation unsurpassed clout throughout the rest of the world, but as the old saying goes “With great power comes great responsibility.” Many other nations not only rely on America’s economy for their own country’s survival, but they also look up to America with a hopeful sense for the future. The founding fathers of this great nation had excellent insight into the authority that America would one day possess, and thus they attempted to set many precedents that would lead the way for the nations that would choose to follow America’s example. Still today, every move that the American nation makes is carefully scrutinized by the other nations of the world. So, it is crucial that the United States ensure that as it moves forward, it does so with a noble and future oriented perception of its goals. Thus, drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve would be a colossal mistake for the United States, because drilling would be detrimental to the pristine indigenous environment, it would have little or no beneficial impact on the American or Global economy, and would poorly exemplify the ambitions that America should have. For the past century, the global dependency on oil has progressively increased each and every year. Now, the world’s need for a steady oil supply is at an all-time high, but oil supplies are slowly dwindling day by day. Oil prices have sky rocketed, the environment has been irreversibly damaged, and it is evident that this rate of oil consumption is completely unsustainable. So should America not be avidly searching for new sustainable alternatives to oil, rather than attempting to destroy land set aside for the very purpose of protecting it against such damaging procedures as oil drilling? The Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The fact “that forty national parks are vulnerable to gas and oil extraction” (Williams 4) makes me believe more is coming, regarding the repeal of the public lands policy. In conclusion, we must stop the insurgence of the government and corporations taking the land for their profits while destroying it in their wake. We need to invest in expanding technology for energy instead of using up the land, along with the continuation of working with the very people our ancestors took the land from in the first…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dwight R Lee Analysis

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his piece, Dwight R. Lee explains that with oil drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, there would be many benefits as compared to the cost. He doesn’t deny that there would be risks associated with the drilling. However, he feels that they do not begin to compare to the benefits. He explains that the main reason that this has become such a hot topic is because of the high prices of gasoline and oil. One company that he looks at is the National Audubon Society. They are against opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling because they feel that it will “destroy the integrity.” This is the same company that owns the 26,000 acre Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary and opens it to drilling. By allowing this drilling, the Audubon Society has received more than $25 million. This has allowed them to own other wildlife and wilderness land.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States had great choice to make this past month in the Presidential Elections. The decision was to continue on our current path or start on a new one. A major point on the two candidates was on the domestic economic policies. Issues on the domestic economic policies were very different for both tickets in this year’s election. Differences were very clear on each party’s stances on drilling on Federal Land. Romney was very adamant on increasing drilling on Federal Land and also creating the much controversial Keystone XL Pipeline. During Obama’s first term, production of natural gas on the United States Federal Land has decreased from 35% to 21%. Though, his dismay of drilling has come after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in which millions of barrels of oil polluted vast areas in the Gulf of Mexico. This trend will be continuing, unless progress is made to ensure the safety of the environment while drilling. This is a main concern for the government, especially on domestic Federal Land.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between the Amerindians and the United States have been one of turmoil, war, and neglect. Treaties have been broken, lives have been lost, and genocidal acts have occurred. Presidents have forcefully removed Amerindians from place to place until they were forced onto reservations. Culture has been destroyed and religious artifacts decimated to create metropolises. But is the Dakota Access Pipeline another hit to the Amerindians? The purpose of this essay is to explain how the Dakota Access Pipeline is not only a finical benefit to the United States but the environmentally savvy one.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carter states evidence by claiming, “In 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower established the original 8.9 million-acre Arctic National Wildlife Range” and then furthering his claim more evidence by saying, “I signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, monumental legislation that safeguarded more than 100 million acres. doubled the size of the former range, and restricted development in areas that are clearly incompatible with oil exploration.” By including this reliable evidence in his statement he is showing readers that he has taken action and that he has proof of doing so, therefore, supporting his claim by to prevent the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from being used to develop industry and is thoroughly committed to protecting the life that inhabits the…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ANWR

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is located in the northeastern corner of Alaska. It consists of about 19 million acres of rolling hills, arctic tundra, and braided rivers along with a variety of migratory birds, caribou and sheep, and bears and wolves. On the west border of ANWR, there is oil development and on the east side of ANWR, the Canadians are drilling too. So, geologists believe that there is a major deposit of oil right in the northern part of ANWR. The question is whether to drill or not to drill in there.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people would most likely feel conflicted if a very large pipeline was being built through their back yard. Some would even take action. In the article, “Native Americans Celebrate pause of North Dakota Pipeline, Vow to Fight on,” the author, Dave Thompson, claims the Native Standing Rock Sioux Tribe feels the same way about their sacred land. However, through growing efforts the Native people of the local region of the pipeline’s construction to discontinue this pipeline they are making progress in halting the continuation of the pipeline. The author provides the readers with mostly fact used to inform the audience of the article…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saving the Native Americans land, Bill Mckibben writes “ Why Dakota is the New Keystone” that incorporates a great deal of culture, pride, and courage. Mckibben goes in depth about Native Americans defending their land against an oil company that could cause them harm to their basic necessities. He also uses strong points of word choice, pathos and tone to paint a detailed picture of what is happening. With using these techniques he is able to so strongly deliver his message easily.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keystone XL Pipeline

    • 1058 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As controversy continues to rise, political and moral disputes encompass the decision to construct the extension of a tunnel containing a composition of today’s most beloved resource, and what has been referred to as “black gold” by the Arabs during the 20th century oil boom. The Keystone XL Pipeline would potentially transport thousands of barrels of oil from its source in Alberta, Canada, to refineries throughout the Midwest and Gulf Coast region of the United States. The extension would add to the number of pipelines already established in the U.S. and continue to convey the tar sands, a compound of clay, sand, water, and bitumen that its lead producer manufactures. The debate of whether or not the construction of this conduit should actually take place has been a hot topic for many politicians and environmentalists. Should the United States authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to import tar sand oil from Canada?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years there has been an environmental debate on whether oil drilling should begin in the largest refuge in the United States, Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR]. High potential for oil within the refuge is estimated but the environmental impacts of oil drilling is harmful and destructive. Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge has pros and cons, however, cons are more significant as it deals with the environment and animals rather than politics and the economy. Pollution is a major consequence of oil drilling, oil spills are also a critical concern that would be devastating to the environment and the animals. Another major concern is climate change as an effect of pollution. The refuge provides a habitat in which…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is not easy question regarding whether America should attempt to drill its way out of dependency on foreign oil or to push hard for alternative energies. Many considerations need to be examined; environmental concerns including global warming, employment, big business, and monetary issues including the trade balance, foreign policy, and special interest groups.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Native American Pipeline

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Native Americans were confined to bleak reservations in vast stretches of the country, that no one thought was good for much of anything else. But those areas, ironically enough, turn out to be essential for the production and transportation of the last great stocks of hydrocarbons (Mckibben). Repeating history, our government and huge corporations are diving through hoops and trampling over morals, wreaking havoc on what little land indigenous people have left. A 1,172- mile, sweet crude oil pipeline, reaching from North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois, is set to be built through Indian reservations, accelerating the pulverizing destruction of our earth (Mckibben).…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offshore Oil Drilling

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Offshore oil drilling is slowly destroying our environment. Over the past few years following the tragic oil spill in the gulf,…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays