Preview

Human Enhancement Ethical Issues

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
204 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Enhancement Ethical Issues
The advent of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering brought about the prospect of human enhancement – that is, of such a use of medicine or technology that would improve human physical and mental traits beyond what is currently regarded as their ‘normal’ scope. In consequence, as the promise of enhancement is moving steadily from science fiction to daily news, a whole new debate emerged on the ethical and legal implications of such ---.
In this article, a voice in the enhancement dispute is raised that draws heavily on Kantian ethics. The reasons for such approach are given in the first section alongside with a more detailed outline of the adopted Kantian stance. In the two subsequent sections, two main issues are discussed: that is,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “staying human” by author Dinesh D’Souza, we are given a voice of reason in response to the “techno utopians” desire to use science as a means to create perfection known as, “post humans.” D’Souza voices that the ability to do something, does not substantiate actually doing it. And, that it “it poses a grave risk to humans.” D’Souza disagrees with “techno-utopians,” and follows the belief that genetic engineering pertaining to modifying intellect and physical attributes in unethical, especially, parents who would elect to make choices about their unborn children. However, D’Souza does find a medium, and believes that genetic engineering could offer many benefits to humanity, such as preventing illness and deformities.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crichton Vs Calfee

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I am not positive that I would appreciate being told that I can’t do something with my body or contents thereof without permission to do so, in fact that individual might just be met with a what could be considered a cruel and vulgar response. There are two well educated men that differ on the matter. A reputable author, Michael Crichton argues the negative side of patenting genes in Patenting Life. While resident scholar of American Enterprise Institute John Calfee’s article Decoding the Use of Gene Patents justifies the use of patents on genes. Crichton and Calfee do not see eye to eye on the matter when it comes multiple issues to include but not limited to the standard in which the Patent Trademark Office (PTO) holds those who obtain…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many current legal and ethical issues in bioengineering and biotechnology including athletic and cognitive enhancements, stem cell research, cloning, genetic engineering, and genetically modified organisms. Biotechnology is “the manipulation of biological systems and organisms through technological means”(p. 471). There is tension between valuing liberty to pursue happiness of biotechnologies, and the potential negative outcomes of these technologies. Bioengineering, is the construction of machines to alter or supplement organisms.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    English 112 Essay

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this essay, to support my standpoint, I will be using work from Rebecca Dresser, who wrote, "Genetic Modification of Preimplantation Embryos: Toward Adequate Human Research Policies." Rebecca Dresser describes current shortcomings and recommends policy actions are designed to ensure, that they must meet certain criteria for research on human modification being practiced. In addition, author, Sally Deneen's article entitled Designer People. Where she asks, Are We Changing the Nature of Nature? Richard Hayes, Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks, the opposing viewpoint to Ronald M. Green. In addition, to the Bible and other scholars, who also feel that, human genetic modification, is unethical.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eugenics Ethical Issues

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the Eugenics program had many issues, both technical and ethical. The basis of the Eugenics program - that an individual’s life can be seen as “a burden” and not worth society’s resources - brings up multiple moral arguments. Who is the judge of whether a life is more valuable than another? Does this not give government workers and referrers the jurisdiction to play God? Inherently, this program had a multitude of factors that were not taken into account. One issue is the measurements used to quantify whether a person should have the right to reproduce or not. The qualifications were too unclear, and a range of reasons were used, from IQ tests, mental illness, handicaps, and even sexual promiscuity. Moreover, while the program was active, the state did not clarify who should make the final decisions. Unlike most states, in which medical professionals mainly acted as the final word, North Carolina allowed social workers, medical professionals, teachers, and even neighbors to have a say in who could possibly be sterilized. Many of these individuals reported unsuspecting…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument holds more weight than bioethical, legal, and theological debates against augmenting mankind, but still loses ground due to the fact that not all human augmentations are severe in nature. Recreational bodily modifications have been gaining popularity in the 2010s, partially due to the video game franchise Deus Ex. The transhumanist futurist society of the mid-21st century that it depicts is not too far off from our own. British tabloid newspaper The Sun accidentally ran an about the game due to the fact that its realistic issues are extremely similar those that society faces today. In it, biotechnology and human augmentations have become the norm (Factor Tech). Political and ethical controversy surrounding “augs” has sparked riots and caused a severe schism between those for and those against human augmentations. Our society is not nearly at this point, but the severity of bioethics getting in the way of scientific progress is nothing short of ludicrous. Recent price gouging in the biomedical field has also caused great debate as to whether medical and science firms not only have the right to develop new technologies and forms of treatment, but if they should have the capability to grant or deny necessary treatments based off of…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As research continues to uncover new disease-causing mutations, the prospect of stopping the transmission of heritable diseases increases. With the use of modern technology, expecting parents can now be prescreened in order to determine their carrier status for certain diseases. Parents who choose to use in vitro fertilization are able to choose embryos that are free of disease due to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Additionally, parents can be provided with information on their unborn child with the use of prenatal genetic testing. Some individuals view modern genetic technology as eugenic; however, this biggest difference between eugenics now and eugenics during the 1900s is consent. Today individuals pursue genetic testing by choice and policies on ethics and consent prevent reoccurrences of the immoral endeavors within the field of…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Biomedical Ethics

    • 2856 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay revolved around many arguments, but mostly two main pro-life arguments. One includes the argument that it is wrong to kill a human being. A fetus is a human being, therefore it is wrong to kill a fetus. Abortion is the killing of a fetus, therefore abortion is wrong. Another argument involved is the argument that all human beings have a right to life. All fetuses are human beings. Killing a being with a right to life is wrong; therefore it is wrong to kill a fetus. Abortion is the killing of a fetus, therefore abortion is wrong. Through her destructive argument she is attempting to establish that even if the fetus is seen as a human being, it does not automatically have a right to use to body of a woman, and thus does not necessarily have a right to life.…

    • 2856 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Enhancement drugs

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Now that I’ve declared the unnaturalness of the idea of brain enhancement, I’d like to address the society this would create. If this enhancement were to be legalized, initially it would become an option. Those who do take it will excel and…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine a world where autism and downs syndrome are a thing of the past, and where there is no shortage on food for anybody. Over the years mankind has developed and improved technology to save more and more lives through the manipulation of the DNA that makes up all living organisms. However, there are those who oppose this approach. Despite the risks and ethical concerns, genetic engineering holds the potential to benefit humanity through both direct and indirect means.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays