Preview

Hunchbacks Trial Is Unfair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
489 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hunchbacks Trial Is Unfair
In the novel, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Victor Hugo talks about how the hunchbacks trial is unfair and about Quasimodo's punishment is for kidnapping La Esmeralda. Quasimodo is deaf and so is the judge so neither of them know when they are being talked to. Once Quasimodo is being interrogated, he starts to answer questions that have been asked previously while the judge is asking new questions. The audience is laughing so the judge assumes he is being rude and sends him to the pillory for an extra hour. Evidence that supports this claim is when Hugo wrote, “But, first of all, as we have already observed, Master Florian did not care to have his deafness noticed. Secondly, he was so stone deaf that he did not hear one word that the clerk

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term Bailment is derived from the French Bailor, "to deliver". A bailment is a temporary transfer of property to another for a limited time and for a specific purpose. The transfer of property in a bailment is only in regards to possession, not ownership. The bailor is the owner of the transferred property. The bailee holds the transferred property. The property is held in trust for the benefit of the bailor. A bailment is completely different from a bail bond.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 5, 1983, defendants Elijah Anton Askov, Ralph Hussey, Samuel Gugliotta, and Edward Melo were charged with attempting to commit extortion against Peter Belmont. The following men Askov, Hussey, and Melo had existing charges on possession of weapons, pointing a firearm, and assault with a weapon. The defendants had been in business with Belmont for supplying exotic dancers to licensed premises. Belmont was offered to pay 50% commission to run a business with Melo and Gugliotta in the Toronto area. However, Belmont refused and contacted the police to file reports. On November 12th, Belmont and his bodyguard were approached by the defendants in a tavern which was under surveillance. Melo and Askov were arrested on scene. Hussey ran away but later turned himself in and was charged on November 14th. Gugliotta was arrested on November 30th. The defendants Melo, Hussey, Askov were denied bail and were placed in custody for 6 months. On May 7th, the three men were ordered to…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case takes place in a meeting between employees of the Florida Project for Human Justice at the Florida State Prison. Diane Epps a fifty-five-year-old Caucasian woman, Executive director, Joe Moran, the other lead attorney (only African American staff), Cynthia Sanders a petite 28-year-old Caucasian woman, the mitigation investigator, and an accountant, Jose Arnada, a thirty-four Mexican American man; the client, was sentenced the death penalty for a crime that he did not commit. Cynthia, the protagonist, is meeting with Diane and Joe to discuss ways to show Jose is competent to write his own appeal.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS

    • 811 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Patrick Driskell was convicted of the murder of Perry Dean Harder. Harder, age 29, was last seen outside his house in a pickup truck. His decomposed body was found three months later in a shallow grave just outside Winnipeg on Sept. 30, 1990. He had been shot three times in the chest. Driskell and Harder were jointly charged in a series of break-and-enters. Driskell said he had nothing to do with the criminal activity. But according to police Harder named him as an accomplice. Five days before the preliminary hearing into those charges, Harder disappeared. The Crown's theory was that Driskell had committed the murder in order to prevent Harder from testifying against him.…

    • 811 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book the author Herb Hanes reveals information on flawed executions. In the author's case flawed executions are “executions in which public sensibilities are offended by a breakdown in routine procedures of convicting murders and putting them to death”. The authors research specifies that botched executions is too small to capture the delicacy of the executions. The paper deliberates four ways in which flawed executions are occured. “1.executions may be technically botched, 2.convicts may not play their assigned roles, 3.the prescribed solemnity of the death chamber may be compromised and irregularities in conviction and 4.sentencing may come to light”.In the paper the author uses evidence and answers specific questions in proving that…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adrian Crump Trial Case

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Manslaughter is a crime that is unjustified, inexcusable, and the intentional killing of a human being, whether it be involuntary or voluntary. This is the criminal charge that Adrian Crump from Jacksonville, Florida had to face. He shot a 15-year-old boy, around 2 in the morning, who was driving around shooting rocks from a slingshot. Adrian heard a noise in his home and thought it was a gunshot. He got up and checked it out, then went back inside and grabbed his gun as well as getting dressed. He then got in his car and pulled up behind the offender’s car, and shot the boy because he put his hands down, and he said he thought the kid was reaching for a gun. During the trial the prosecutor and defense team brought up the two sides of the story. We were asked how we felt about the trial and how we would find him. I took into consideration Adrian’s motivation or intention, self-defense, the witness’ statements, and crimes going on around the city.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second chapter of Eyes on the Prize, Standing for Justice discusses segregated South mostly Mississippi and the rising blacks murdered. Its primary focus Emmet Till reviewed the story of what led to his killing and the proceedings after his death. The chapter started with the Supreme Court case of Brown V.S. Board of Education, which desegregate public schools in America. Following the ruling, Mississippians did not welcome the decision, and the lack of court orders showed the government’s actual interest. Even the President of the United States, President Eisenhower did not endorse either side but made that clear when he made a comment about Earl Warren. Noticing the rising threat of African Americans, as the population had more blacks…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “if you don’t know what to say to help someone in need. Sometimes, it can be just enough to take the time to listen and provide a supporting shoulder to lean on.” Said by David Cunliffe. Based on the Jib Fowles’ “advertisings fifteen basic appeals “each one of these appeals has an effective meaning in this world. Based on these fifteen appeals I have chosen the fourth appeal which is “the need for guidance”. This appeal has an amazing meaning in the context of the world we live in, but each one of us have a different explanation and meaning to it. In My opinion the meaning of this appeal is to help people understand themselves in terms of personal ability, interest, motivation and potential. The need for guidance is to be protected, shielded, guided. many people need for be guided and supported by others.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1982 rape and murder of 31 year old Mary Bell of LaSalle Park neighborhood of St. Louis which was presumably solved is now officially an open cold case file. After new evidence was brought to the court’s attention, it was decided by the courts not to retry Mr. George Allen who has been officially exonerated as of November 14, 2012. Thanks to The Innocence Project, Mr. Allen can now try to regain what has been taken away from him. Thirty years to be exact.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading and viewing the racism pieces, I conclude that a want for structure and a need to be dominant were two driving factors in the wrongful Scottsboro trials. Many white people during the Great Depression wanted the world to be black and white, but the problem is that the world exists in vibrant colors. White people during the Great Depression lacked the structure that they wanted, which was a reason behind their racist actions (Routledge). These people served on juries and decided that the Scottsboro boys were guilty despite no substantial evidence (Anderson). The white people on the jury that declared the Scottsboro boys guilty, may have done this because of a need to be dominant. Humans want to have power, and one way for humans…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is fair to be tried in both civil and criminal court for the same alleged actions because they deal with different aspects of the crime. For civil cases, it deals with whether you are liable or not, while in criminal cases it's whether your guilty or not. You can be found not guilty in a criminal case, however, you can still be found liable in civil cases. It is only fair that the victims get awarded damages. Furthermore, it is not against the 5th amendment since the defendant won't be at risk of life or limb in civil cases. Moreover, those found guilty in criminal cases are rarely brought against in civil torts. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with being tried in a criminal and civil court for the same crime.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Lynn Hubbard is handicapped. She happens to also have her own law firm. In the past year, she sued more than 600 nearly irreproachable institutions for over two million dollars. Hubbard and her entourage of scheming lawyers have not done anything illegal. Some may argue that she has simply exercised her right to the legal system. In any case, Hubbard is part of the growing American society that has discovered large money in mass litigation. This rise in greedy and manipulative lawyers has provided Americans with a skewed financial interest in the American courtroom and has hindered the justice system as a whole. Congress must reexamine tort reform to provide Americans with a trustworthy and secure justice system from frivolous lawsuits.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please accept this letter as a complaint of employment discrimination based on gender by Alice Bennett. Please also accept this letter as an appearance by Marcia Robinson of Auburn University Legal Services on behalf of Mrs. Alice Bennett.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays