Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Hypocrisy: United Kingdom and Language George Orwell

Good Essays
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hypocrisy: United Kingdom and Language George Orwell
Hypocrisy is defined as the practice of claiming to have moral standards to which one’s own behavior does not exhibit. In 10th grade Stockbridge High School English, you claim to do something but actually don’t. Just like joy, pain, anger, and sorrow; hypocrisy is inevitable in the world we live in today. When I read the essay “Politics and the English Language”, I automatically thought of Pastor Eddie Long. I know your thinking, “What in the world is he talking about?”, but Orwell and Pastor Long are alike in many ways. They both spoke out against a topic very critically, Orwell against bad language and Pastor Long against homosexuality, but still ended up involving themselves in the activity. George Orwell had a strong stance against the state of the English language. He talked harshly about the English language but was he guilty of the same things he preached so harshly against? The answer to this question is yes. Based on the fact that environment affects language and his admission to the crime in Politics in the English Language, he IS in fact a hypocrite. I have two points to make that proves Orwell’s hypocrisy and then I will be done. My first point is the fact that Orwell admits to using the same bad language that he writes about! In the essay Politics and the English Language George Orwell says, and I quote, “Look back through this essay, and for certain you will find that I have again and again committed the very faults I am protesting against.” Now this sounds just like a high school girl if you ask me. They argue a point, argue it again, and then apologize and admit to being hypocritical. Some people out there will say that even though Orwell was a hypocrite, he was very qualified to write this paper. I agree with you on that. He was very, and I mean VERY, qualified to write this essay but that alone does not make hypocrisy okay. That’s just like saying that its right for the KKK to lynch black people and then write a book about how people should be equal. IT JUST ISNT RIGHT! Listen to this sentence. But an effect can become a cause, reinforcing the original cause and producing the same effect in an intensified form, and so on indefinitely. That came straight from the text. Orwell wrote this and this is proof of his hypocrisy.
My second point is actually a point that Orwell makes himself. He says that, and I again quote, “Modern English, especially written English, is full of bad habits which spread by imitation and which can be avoided if one is willing to take the necessary trouble.” This quote is saying that people in the country are easily influenced into using bad language. People use it and others catch on who in turn spread it to others. This effectively destroys the good use of language we have in our country. If this is true, then Orwell is hypocritical because he too lives in the same society as the people who speak the decadent English. Some people out there will say that Orwell knows too much to be easily influenced. Studies show that if you are around people enough then you will start to act as they do. Because Orwell lives in the same country that we do, he in turn acts as we do.
I would like to leave you with a few questions to ponder. Are you a hypocrite? If you are, it may not be that big of a deal. But if you go public preaching and marching against a cause that you really support, as Stockbridge Students would say, you need to chill out. You don’t want to end up like George Orwell who is a world class hypocrite. Based on the facts that I have provided in this speech, Orwell IS in fact a hypocrite. Thank you.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A major theme for both of Orwell’s works is the idea that people, ignorantly, don’t care about what they say or think, and then because they don’t have minds of their own they are easier to manipulate. In his Politics and the English Language, Orwell says how people don’t think about what they are writing and how they have no control over their own mind as ready-made phrases fill their paper and their mind. Then in 1984, Orwell takes this idea a step further showing how easy a civilization of thoughtless ignorance can become one of mindless devotion towards the government. In the book the characters lose their sense family ties, lose sense of time, they lose emotions, they lose their individuality, they lose their ability to remember the past,…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As it is mentioned in the beginning of "Politics and the English language " that "George Orwell (1903-1950), one of the most brilliant social critics of the twentieth century...", Orwell states that English Language is losing its identity. He illustrates six solutions to improve language and the language usage for explanation is manipulative. In "Politics and The English Language", George Orwell is trying to tackle the issue of English Language decline due to bad language usage, but the six solution that Orwell stated are being broken by him that weakens his argument on English Language destruction that leads an individual to have sense of manipulation.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell sent this essay into New Writing which is highly anti-fascist and anti-imperialistic, which causes the readers to be against ruling over another country by force. This cause George Orwell’s writing style to differ in some aspects. He speaks of how he hates…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Orwell translated a well-known verse from Ecclesiastes that contained an archaic style piece of writing to the modern English language and it was dreadful and emotionless, the modern version had long and complicated words and it didn’t go straight to the point. The essay wasn’t necessarily about politics, there were a few sections about how politicians…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The misleading of information while maintaining the writer’s original goal shapes the opinion of the readrer "Humans have always resorted to euphemisms, vague and indirect expressions, in their quest to avoid and camouflage life’s harsh realities."(Halmari). In relation to Orwell the same views are held, the use of euphemisms greatly skew the true information, “The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms" (Orwell). These methods of language leave one with a lack of content to form a proper opinion about a statement or event; this is seen in the conflicts over Egypt displayed in the hacktivists documentary. The hacktivist group stands for freedom of speech, to protest, and clear language from their government. This group takes action in various ways ranging from physical protest to DDoS attacks. This coincides with Orwell’s vision, because first world society euphemism is used to provide a cloudiness and vagueness to harsh more serious events in history (Orwell). Through both Orwell and the film the desire for said clear language is evidently shown. Concluding the current state of our politics revolve around a government’s ability to use euphemisms in order to continue current actions while representing them as a viable reasoning’s to the public…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Orwell Questions

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. In the opening two paragraphs, what general attitude does Orwell identify as an impediment to the improvement of language usage?…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Injuries in the Nfl

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Orwell, George. “politics and the English Language.” The McGraw-Hill: Issues Across The Disciplines.11th edition. Ed. Gilbert Muller. New York: McGraw-Hill,2011. Print. 106-116.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell was a prominent political writer during the post-WWII era who openly opposed totalitarian governments. In the novel 1894, Orwell creates a dystopian society where the idea of individuality does not exist. The novel takes place in Oceania, a fictional country, where the party and its ruler, Big Brother, seek to have complete control over the population. The party implements many tactics in order to achieve this, such as surveillance, propaganda, and degradation of language to gain control of the population’s minds. Furthermore, the party destroys all aspects of independent thought and identity.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell portrays that rhetoric and language have the capability to control the population; “For one thing, Orwell's entire story is predicated on a bleak and soulless view of humanity” (Scaliger 1). This is basically telling people to stay where they are living due to the nation that are growing less confident for what they believe in and for what feels right; both in real life and in the novel, suppose that a tragedy can occur that would appear on the news, which illustrates for the people who do watch the news and those who think that everything on the news is not false. In addition that people really do not have a concept of what happens in the real world although the propaganda makes people believe that they know what goes on out…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell is trying to show that if no one rebels and questions things someone would be able to take control and mislead people into believing what they say even if it isn’t accurate. This can be seen throughout history in instances such as Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, and more. All of these leaders controlled their people but using propaganda and distorting information so that they could essentially brainwash their citizens because the only information they were allowed access to was controlled and regulated by these leaders. I believe Orwell was trying to show how the restriction of information and the use of fear can be used to persuade people that they need to take drastic measures to protect themselves. By portraying enemies as a treat and using propaganda to instill fear in the society leaders are able to get the same reaction from their citizens that the Party was able to get from Winston when he was in Room 101.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 Research Paper

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion Orwell is using this novel to inform the United States of what will happen if they don't intervene in World War ll. If the United States doesn't fight in the war the world will become a dystopian society making Hitler ruler of all. Orwell uses totalitarianism and reality to illustrate that we will have no sense of self identity or loyalty to self if we continued to turn a blind eye to what was happening in surrounding…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1984 Political Language

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Political language [...] is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” In George Orwell’s novel, 1984 and his essay “Politics and the English Language” there is a clear connection between politics, language, and expressing the truth. Politics aims to control people by altering and distorting language. George Orwell’s prescient view of society envisioned a future where government would suppress freedom through censorship and suppression of free thought. The control of language is the most dangerous weapon a government can possess, because it allows for the ability to dictate how people…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell was also incorrect in the way he believed newspeak would be used. He never expressed the belief that a group besides the leaders would use newspeak. Today newspeak has been swapped for the term political correctness. "The notion of political correctness came into use among communists in the 1930s as a semi-humorous reminder that the party's interest is to be treated as a reality that ranks above reality itself."(Codevilla) This quote is saying that whatever the leaders tell must be true and that their words out weigh history. Today this political correctness is used not as much by a party as it is used by the people that want to force their ways onto the common person changing their way of life. The most impactful example today is with…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This novel is written in Orwell's typical style. That is to say in the 3rd person narrative and in a clear, lucid way. None of the words used in the novel are particularly complicated, this is due to two different things. Firstly, George Orwell was principally an essayist, he is considered to be one of the best English essayists of the 20th century, and he is known for his opinion that long words and complicated grammar structures are unnecessary for good prose. This meant that he preferred to write in a way that could be easily understood but was also very interesting. Moreover, there are very few examples of ¡°poetical¡± writing, that is to say figurative language such as metaphors or similes, which means that Orwell¡¯s ideas are presented as universal truths.…

    • 3098 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell Imperialism

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    an elephant. Orwell is a British police officer who is always teased by the Burmese, who see…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays