After watching this film my assertion was that we are what wrong with the world I am what wrong with the world. In order to change the world we need to tart with our self’s, this how we change the world, but this a broad answer. Thru my analytical argument four work literary lost to millenniums will be used too make an argument, the four ancient stories are, The Buddha: Sermon at Benares, The Enuma Elish, and Plato: The Allegory of the Cave, Matthew 13. …show more content…
The next part of the first assertion question is our separation from the natural world. “From I Am the belief is that our job as people is to be consumers wanting and buying more stuff, more stuff equal more happiness.” This assumption I find to be a double edge sword because yes our economy drives off of consumerism but so does the world economy. When you take a look at the economy it’s the sell and providing of goods and services that generates money there for growing the firms, college, markets our society as a whole. Yes our job is to be consumers but that such a broad prospective word the woman at Walmart has as much an effect on our economy as the college paying for classes a service. Their nothing wrong with being a consumer it when you use the goods to fill a void that where you want happiness or becoming glutinous that makes it wrong. In “Doctrine in the mean the middle way is different for everyone” a millionaire consumption might seem wrong to me, but I’m basing it on my mean and this is