Preview

I See A Killer Die Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
948 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
I See A Killer Die Summary
I See a Killer Die
The purpose of Allan Hall’s article, ‘I See a Killer Die’, is to inform readers about one of the many convicts who have died from capital punishment in America. Hall wrote about a man, Robert Harris, who killed two innocent boys; he used a shotgun to ‘blast to death’ two teenage boys in a robbery. Harris did not show any remorse after the murders.
In my opinion this is an important subject, because many people disagree with this method of punishment. They believe that capital punishment is pointless and unpleasant. Others believe that it acts as a crime deterrent and helps society by protecting people from killers, psychopaths and the mentally insane.
Harris was not loved by everyone; in fact some people may have even hated
…show more content…
This proves to me that Harris was a fake and trying to hide his emotions; Harris only got emotional when it was him who was dying; this tells me that he only cares about himself. Harris must have thought that if the families were there to see him die then they might have forgiven him. Instead, by using the word ‘deny’ it shows that he hasn’t realised how much pain he actually caused. I believe that the families had the right to watch him be executed because they needed the justice for the death of their children. Some people may say that everyone has the right for a private death because they believe it is more enlightened. I think that not everyone deserves to die privately because not everyone is civilised; Harris was not a civilised man.
Harris said “You can be a king or a street sweeper, but everyone dances with the reaper”; these words were Harris’ last before he was taken to death. I believe that Harris is saying, no matter what you made of yourself, everyone is going to die in the end and it doesn’t matter how. He might have said this to the guard to tell him that he was not sorry for killing the boys and that they were going to die in the end anyway. In my opinion Harris says this as an excuse for the crimes he has committed, this makes me feel like he still hasn’t realised that killing is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In response to the article ‘I see a killer die’ the writer has used the word ‘’killer’ to dehumanise Harris’ rather than saying his name, blaming Harris for murdering the two 16 year olds to death. The verbs ‘’see’’ and ‘’die’’ are written in present tense to make us, the readers feel that we are there, witnessing this horrendous act take place.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Death, Reason, and Judgment: The American Experience”, which was posted on the ‘Filosofia Politica’ website (1), Ronald J. Allen (2) argues in a high academic level on the meaning and nature of errors in the imposition of capital punishment. Ronald J. Allen is the John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law at Northwestern University in Chicago. This paper will analyse and discuss the theories of the article and address two issues raised by Allen: the utilitarian and normative components of capital punishment, and the costs of errors of capital punishment.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay shows us what we would uncover if we saw where the government was being completely transparent. In “Executions Should be Televised” the question of how some people are executed comes up. In “The Death Penalty,” Bruck answers that question when he writes about a man named Joseph Carl Shaw, a former military policeman who helped murder two teenagers while suffering from a mental illness and being high off of PCP (Bruck 490). Shaw was executed by the electric chair, a contraption that was built over 100 years ago (Bruck 490). With today’s medical advancements and technologies however, there are plenty of ways to perform an execution that does not cause severe pain. By executing a man in such a barbaric way, Bruck shows the reader how their constitutional right defined by the 8th amendment, that “cruel and unusual punishments [should not be] inflicted,” is being ignored (“Bill of Rights of the United States of…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Harris

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have been reading your article, ‘‘I see a killer die’’. I will be talking about my opinion also my response will cover the reasons why people are against or for capital punishment. Finally I will be writing a conclusion. After reading your article on ‘‘I see a killer die’’, in the first place I strongly disagree with The Execution of Robert Harris which was described in detail in your article. Why should the government kill the killer? This makes them a murderer as well. Even the prisoners with him are using words such as ‘‘this beast’’ to describe Robert Harris, but it is wrong to punish his crimes by taking his life away. This shows that they are equally as bad as the murderer. Why did they not decide to close him up in prison for life time or he could do duties and work under the government’s control.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thump… The mouth starts to gurgle, as fluid starts to erupt. This is the sound of death. I believe that the death penalty is nothing but a true reflection of how, even though we think we have revolutionized and developed, the impact is not as profound. We are still blinded by our animal instincts. In addition, ‘an eye for an eye only ends up making the world blind’-Mahatma Ghandi, killing each other is not only inhumane,but rather provokes more killing. Harris’ death penalty was the first in 25 years in the state of California, which logically, resulted in the comfort and aggravation in using the death…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian and Toulmin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although capital punishment might bring closure to the family and loved ones of victims, who is to bring closure to family of the accused? Taking someone’s life can mean leaving a child fatherless or motherless, it can mean leaving a loving mother sonless or daughterless. There is no real humane way of viewing the…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There has been a great deal of controversy over whether or not the the death penalty should be abolished. There had been many supreme cases involving the death penalty. people view the death penalty as cruel because it seems excessive or as in inescapable consequence of death. There’s also the belief that the death penalty defers murder because people fear death. Society has developed more humane ways of carried out capital punishment. Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia are two significant cases that change the view of the issues that related to the death penalty which are racial discrimination, mentally impaired, juveniles, due process and lethal injection.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is death penalty? Death penalty is when a state or the government issues the punishment of execution to some one who has committed a crime. It has always been one of the most highly debated issues in the United States. Many Americans are against the capital punishment or commonly knows as the death penalty because they fear its too expensive or there are religious reasons to oppose the death penalty or some other reasons. But my point of view is just like the bible and what it says "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" meaning if you killed some body you ought to be killed also. Most people aren't worried about the life after committing crimes because they know that the laws aren't strict enough to make them to stop committing crimes. To these people, laws don't hold them back from doing what they want to do. Capital punishment is mainly used for murderers and other serious criminals dangerous to our society. People who oppose the capital punishment clearly don't feel the pain and the trouble the victims and their families has gone through. So, is capital punishment necessary? Yes, capital punishment deters crime and gives closure to families of the victim.…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanging, the firing squad, the gas chamber, the electric chair, lethal injection; these are some present methods of the death penalty. Capital punishment has been used in America for a long time, and has always presented conflicts. There are many groups that protest capital punishment, and there are many groups that are for it. The controversies it presents have to do with the cost, if it is humane, or if it is moral. With all of these problems taken into consideration, it is clear to anyone that capital punishment is the wrong choice. Capital punishment has proven to neither deter criminals, neither directly reduce crime rate nor even rightfully punish rebellious members of society. Rather, capital punishment has cost the American people millions of dollars in maximum-security prisons and executions, wrongfully sentenced innocent men and women, and blatantly gone against the eighth amendment of the Constitution of the United States.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rogerian Argument

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should capital punishment be permitted? Capital punishment is the sentencing of death to a convicted criminal, and its legalization varies by state. It is a method that has been used since the beginning of mankind. Currently, there are only thirteen states that do not enforce the death penalty; meaning over half of the nation agrees with it. To this day, this subject remains very controversial. The main opposing view in this argument is that the death penalty is immoral; claiming that it under values human life. Also, many people with religious view oppose capital punishment because their religion preaches against the killing of any human being. Is seems this is an issue in which everyone will not find stasis.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays