The section of the Declaration of Independence titled "The Charges Against the King is extremely important. The English Declaration of Rights included a similar section, so without indicating the revolutions' causes it would have been very difficult to justify independence. Today and during the time of the revolution many of the accusations seemed rather weak and unsupported. However there were some that were considered by all to be significant infractions. One of these is "no taxation without representation" or more specifically "For imposing taxes on us without our consent.
The fact that England was taxing the people without representation was by no means a trivial matter. The principle of no taxation without representation dates back to Magna Carta in 1215. The Magna Carta would later become the basis for English law and is actually cited in the Petition of Right of 1628. In fact taxation without representation was the primary reason for the revolution in England and the execution of Charles I. The English considered the right of no taxation without representation to be very sacred as well.
The rationalization that the English used to reconcile this abuse was something called virtual representation. This idea was that if someone was a British subject they were represented by all the members of Parliament. This idea was absurd and was especially ridiculous for Americans who were thousands of miles away from England. The English really had no idea of what life was like in the colonies so how can they claim to represent the colonies. The colonists despised the idea of virtual representation. They were either represented or they were not.
The colonists clung to the principle of no taxation without representation with consistency. The government in England replied that the government could not be divided between legislative power in London and taxing power in the colonies. This forced the colonists to deny the authority of Parliament altogether and to begin considering independence. This was one very important step on the road to revolution.
It was not just a single tax that the colonists found to be so upsetting but it was the combination of them all that made that colonists feel bogged down. They were the Sugar Act (1764) the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767. The Stamp Act of 1765 required all legal documents, licenses, commercial contracts, newspapers, pamphlets and even playing cards to carry a tax stamp. This tax was in your everywhere for the colonists. It was often the reason that the Sons of Liberty and the Daughters of Liberty violently protested. They would ransack houses of popular officials, confiscated money an hanged effigies of stamp agents on liberty poles. The stamp act created much of the tension between England and the colonists that would eventually lead to revolution.
Another very important tax was the Townshend Acts of 1767. They imposed a light import duty on glass, white lead, paper, paint, and tea. The Townshend Acts were not too unreasonable but the colonists were on the look out for any kind of tax that might jeopardize their liberties. It was not an "in your face" type of tax as the stamp tax was, but nonetheless the colonist saw it as a British effort to suppress their liberties. The Townshend acts were eventually repealed. That is all but he tea tax. This tax affected the estimated 1 million people that drank it each day. The Boston tea party and the colonist refusal to pay back the lost tea and the Boston massacre only caused tensions to build even more.
The colonist began to realize that the taxes they were paying to support the troops in the New World did not benefit them in any way. All the threats from the French and Indian war had been eliminated. So what then was the purpose of the British even being here. They came to the conclusion that it was to suppress and contain the colonists.
The principle of "no taxation without representation" was very important to the colonist who had a good understanding of history and of the English Revolution. The colonists were angry with Britain for other reasons as well such as their sealed economic system. The grievance of taxation without representation was an age old right that they could use to justify their independence.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Restated Thesis. Taxation without representation was common in the 13 colonies. Colonists often debated about why a small island, Great Britain, should rule a piece of a continent, the 13 colonies, from 3,000 miles away. The Stamp Act was issued by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act directly taxed printed materials. In Document 2, John Dickinson, a political leader from Pennsylvania, shows his disagreement with the Stamp Act. John Dickinson shares that Great Britain never thought the colonies would thrive as much as they did, so when the British Parliament issued the Stamp Act, and it was just for the purpose of raising Britain’s revenue, he disagreed with it. In addition, all the laws regarding the colonies only talked about regulating trade but it never intended the raising of taxes. John Dickinson, like many other patriots tolerated the old taxes, but at the Stamp Act, they drew the line, because Britain was taking money from the abundant colonies, with no benefits in return. The Townshend Acts followed the Stamp Act in 1767. Similarly, in Document 2, John Dickinson talks about the Townshend Acts having the same purpose as the Stamp Act, bringing more money to Britain. However, this time, when the Townshend Acts were issued, the tax was hid in the price. Charles Townshend hoped the colonists would be glad there were no more taxes even though the taxes would be right in the price. Unfortunately for Great Britain, the colonists realized that Britain was trying to be sneaky and hide the tax, so they got even madder. Moreover, the British never…
- 528 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Soame Jenyns felt the same way about England’s right to tax. Jenyns was a member of British Parliament and in his work “The Objections to the Taxation Considered” he states that the British have the authority to tax the colonists and he talks about virtual representation. This is the belief that a member of Parliament virtually represents every person in that empire and there is no need for specific representatives in the colonies. His main argument against the colonists is that no Englishman is taxed by his own consent. Every single Englishman is taxed in Britain and the majority are not represented so the colonists are not alone. On page three of his work, he asks them why they didn’t object to the protection England provided to them but…
- 148 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Parliamentary taxes on the colonial peoples started with the Navigation Acts in 1660, but they were not an issue to the colonial people because they were too difficult to enforce. Then in 1764 the Stamp Act was passed, this was the first direct tax on the colonists. The Navigations Acts and the Sugar Acts of 1764, which was a tax placed on imported molasses and sugar, had not directly affected colonists, it affected the merchants. The merchants in hand would just raise prices. The stamp act was completely different. It said that any document or printed item would need to have a stamp placed on it purchased from the British government. The Stamp Act upset the colonists; it would be their real reason for rebellion. The time when the stamp act was passed is when we hear the infamous line “No taxation without representation” and they were right to make that demand. The mistake of not making simple…
- 1765 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Many colonies held protests against these taxes (Doc. G), and one colonist, Thomas Paine, published a pamphlet titled Common Sense which “urged Americans to declare independence from Great Britain” (Doc. C). This “paved the way for the Declaration of Independence” (Doc. C). Moreover, there were inter-colonial organizations that coordinated these protests and much more. For example, the Sons of Liberty were very influential in colonial resistance. They “plac[ed] themselves between the colonial leadership and the mob” (Doc. B), the mob being the enraged colonists in the streets. As a result of this resistance, Great Britain was forced to take action, not only in the colonies but in parliament as…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The constitution guarantees to appoint at least one representative for every thirty thousand residents of a state to be present to determine the amount of taxes per state. Before America's independence England taxed the colonies without any representation. This lead to the Boston tea party where the colonists rebelled against England by the throw barrels of tea in the ocean which were highly taxed. Because of the colonists’ experiences with the unjust power of England they made sure that no one was unfairly taxed. The colonists additionally experienced the absolute power of kings and avoided the possibility of nobility by outlawing titles. Through the Constitution, the colonists sought to create a nation the avoided the faults of England…
- 136 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Colonists were outraged by all their taxes (i.e. Sugar Act, Stamp Act and the Townshend Act) (Doc H). Even Benjamin Franklin came to look for others in order to repeal the stamp act (Doc G). They echoed “taxation without representation.” Though they did not want to be taxed either way, they just did not want to be taxed when they are not slightly represented. With all these taxes, it couldn’t be helped that the Colonists would want to rebel, leading to the American Revolution.…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The colonists had many reasons to declare independence against Britain. The colonists believed the British were unfair to the colonists, one way was by taxation without representation. The colonists had no representatives in Parliament, so when Parliament passed taxes without the consent of the colonists, they believed it was very unfair, and they shouldn’t have to pay the taxes. Also, the British put many taxes on goods for the colonists. Some examples of these taxes were the sugar act, a tax on sugar, the stamp act, the law to buy a stamp for every single paper they had, and the tea act, which not only taxed the colonists for tea, but it also allowed the British to have control of all tea trade. The colonists did not like these taxes because…
- 238 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Third, the payment of high taxes by the British government was due to more than reasons. Two reasons are that they wanted to show the colonists that they were in control and because of their money problems. Due to their big debt after the war Britain thought the colonists should help pay of some of their debt. The colonist might have agreed but they were upset that the King and Parliament had taxed them without their consent. They wanted to vote about their own taxes like the people in Britian. However, the colonies were not allowed to send representatives to parliament to speak for them.…
- 551 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Revolution of 1689 furnished British Americans a weapon against tyranny. When a government is tyrannical it was the duty of the government to change or overthrow it. No government had the right to tax its subjects other than via their elected representatives.…
- 4255 Words
- 18 Pages
Better Essays -
They felt that they were being taxed without representation, however, English parliament disagreed and said that they were being adequately represented. As colonies of the British government, they were there to serve the mother country and that their representatives were the contributing to parliament for the benefit of the people. It is important to understand both sides to the issues because taxation without representation was one of the reasons that the Revolutionary War began and how these issues affected the world to become what is…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
English officials assumed that the Parliament must have ultimate authority and power over all laws and taxes, but the Colonists need to reserve colonial authority for their own legislatures. Also the Americans were outraged that men thousands of miles across the sea, whom they have not voted for, are making decisions for and representing them. They were also misrepresenting them in, voting in favor for several laws over the course of (1765-1773).…
- 818 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the colonists had no representative in Parliament they had no way of knowing what amount of revenue was required to successfully defray these expenses and so it appeared Parliament now had a way to indefinitely pass tax after tax against the…
- 569 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The colonies in America though, were being taxed to gain revenue. In the book Letters From a Farmer in Pennsylvania, John Dickinson an American colonist, who was an active member of both the Stamp Act and Continental Congresses wrote about these profit gaining taxes, The Townshend Acts. He wrote "[The Townshend Acts claim the authority] to impose duties on these colonies, not for the regulation of trade but for the single purpose of levying money on us." (Document 2) The only point of the Townshend Acts was to make a profit for Britain off her American colonies. This money wasn't going back across the Atlantic to help the colonists become more self-sufficient, instead it was probably going directly into the pockets of parliament and King George III. Why shouldn't the colonies revolt if they were being taxed unreasonably, only to make the rich more wealthy?…
- 818 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The colonists despised the unlimited power of the parliament and their authority to levy taxes to raise revenue. The colonist had to fight against the tyranny. The parliament passed many unjustified laws that were unconstitutional and destructive to the liberty to the colonies. The parliament believed they had the authority to make laws to regulate the trade of all the colonies. The British made it known that the parliament had “the right to make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever” as stated in Document 5. The colonists felt it was unfair for the British to have unlimited power over them. {Document 2 & Document 5}…
- 316 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The colonists didn't want to pay taxes passed by the Parliament because they know that their money will end up paying for the war debts which the colonists don't want to because they believe that taxes were supposed to use for the development of the city or aid those who are in poverty.…
- 139 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays