Preview

In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
493 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis
After the Constitution was developed, America split into two groups: those who wanted to ratify the constitution and those who did not. This quote is written by a federalist who wanted to ratify the constitution in order to protect the rights of man. Government was created to alleviate the issues caused by the faults of man. No person is truly perfect because everyone is born unique. Everyone’s unique thoughts will always clash with someone else’s.
According to Gregory S. Kavka, “government is necessary to constrain people’s conduct toward one another, because people are not sufficiently virtuous to exercise the requisite degree of control on their own” (G. Kavka). In other words, government is created to control the faults of human nature for example, greediness and unfairness. “Framing a government which is to be administered by men over men” (R. Higgs). However, government is made of men with human faults and will act selfishly for their own gain if necessary. This is why constraints are put on government systems preventing absolute power to reign over citizens. If men were born without faults, if men were born perfect,
…show more content…
“In The Federalist No. 51...James Madison wrote in defense of a proposed national constitution that would establish a structure of checks and balances between the different departments of the government and, as a result, constrain the government’s oppression of the public” (R. Higgs). James Madison advocated for a strong federal government rather than weak government with a strong state government. A strong federal allowed the states to be united with the sacrifice of being government by a powerful few. Anti federalists argued this was similar to the monarchy they had just escaped. Federalists also wanted to ratify the Constitution to protect the rights of the people by constraining the powers of each of the government branches. (Levine and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist No. 39 “The conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles,” is the thirty-ninth of The Federalist Papers and was published by James Madison on January 18, 1788. Madison defines what a Republican form of government is considered, which was what the nation was currently called. It also considers whether the nation is federal or national: a confederacy, or consolidation of states. At the current moment the nation was considered Federal and states were confederate, but they were leaning towards A National government. (federal vs. national government.) Madison then defines what republic means and states three rules which must comply to be considered a Republic:…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main purpose of Federalist NO. 39: The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles was to determine whether the general form and aspect of the government was strictly republican. Madison states that no other form of government, other than Republic would be compatible with the “genius of the people of America” and the “fundamental principles of the Revolution”. He then defines republic government, which is a type of government that derives it power indirectly or directly from the people; the government is administered by people who hold public office for a limited period of time or during good behavior. Madison thinks that the Constitution complies with the rules of a republican form of government. Some other people, doesn’t agree with…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist paper 51, Madison responds to the fear that a national government will lead to the dissolution of a republic, and the creation of a monarchy or despot where the people will no longer rule. His answer to the Anti-Federalist’s rightful fears were to institute three branches of government that would check and balance each other at all times so one branch would…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist believed in distributing equal power between the three branches of the government (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial), the national government and the states to ensure a firewall that prevented an overreach of power. Madison’s wish was to have a fair…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist #51 Analysis

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What does Madison mean when he states, “each department should have a will of its own”?…

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay, Federalist No. 51, James Madison addresses the importance of a fair and equal governmental structure that is divided into several departments. His introduction informs the readers that his ideas are not intended to undermine a full development, but to enlighten individuals on the importance of the idea itself. He suggested that the foundation of the divided powers of government must be constructed in such a way where each department should have “a will of its own” and where the people are to appointment members for the supreme executive, legislative, and judiciary magistracies. The first provision Madison mentions is the difficulty of forming a government that is “ran by men, over men”, but explains that experience has shown…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1700’s our founding fathers wrote many documents to control the government in their time and make it better for the future. One of the most influential groups of essays written are the Federalist Papers. Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay these papers were made to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. SInce the papers were written such a long time ago, some have become outdated and are no longer useful in today's society. Federalist Paper 51 is one of the most powerful and popular of the essays written. Written by Alexander Hamilton, the paper explains how the government should run including the necessity of checks and balances and exclusion of government…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Paper No. 16

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In previous papers I have given you clear reason to support the union for your own benefit. I've presented the dangers that would follow, should the union that binds the states together, break. Finding the correct information can be difficult and it is my goal to help you understand the current status our union is in, in the best manner that can be done.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution that was created had a strong central government and weak state governments. The anti-federalists believed in weak central and strong state governments, as the way it was in The Articles of Confederation. They thought that if the Government got all of the power, they would lose their rights and freedoms. This makes sense, because if the people making the rules live relatively close to you, they will be able to judge better than a house of representatives or a president who is 1000 miles away. They also remembered that from their experiences as British colonists, a federal government can tax, and can tax the people highly. One more reason that they didn't like it is because it didn't contain a Bill of Rights, so it is hard to judge what rights this government is going to give…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He describes it as a reflection of our own human nature. If man is naturally dominant, greedy, and controlling, in turn government will be as well. If I had to answer his question, I would say government is what keeps order and justice. Though, this is not always a guarantee because every man, political view, and judgement varies. There is no guarantee in government. In general, I feel government is starting to overstep their line and boundaries. They are beginning to overstep their place too much, possibly due to the general voting public not participating at all. Allowing, government to step in even…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If men were created equal, no government would be necessary,” said James Madison in the Federalist Papers. He is trying to make a point that if men weren’t so different and only wanted what was best for him, there would be no need for government. The government is here to try and make great decisions about the nation so that we…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federalism was needed in the Constitution to make sure that the national government did not gain too much power. After the revolution, many people feared a monarchy or any form of government in which the central ruling body had too much power. The framers wanted the states to have much more power than the national government, and allowed the national government power only in areas that concerned the nation as a whole. Areas such as war, negotiation, and foreign commerce were some of the only circumstances in which the national government had absolute power. By limiting the national governments power in this way, the writers felt that they had ensured the sovereignty of the individual states. Also, people have a tendency to feel more connected to their state government than they would a national government. Therefore, by giving the states more power, people are more likely to be happy with their government. Federalist papers 45 and 46 are both arguments by James Madison as to why the people should not be afraid of the proposed Constitution and the powers it entailed regarding the national government. In paper 45, he shows that without the state legislatures a president cannot be elected. The same is true for the Senate and the House of Representatives. Madison also stated in paper 45 that the number of tax collectors that the national government will have compared to the number employed by the state governments is very small. The powers given to…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were in favor of separation of powers with a strong national government and weak state governments. The Anti-Federalists craved a strong state government in fear that a more powerful national government would become a power hungry tyrannical monster. The debate between the two parties over the majority rule versus minority rights had to be handled with care in order to prevent a disruption in the balance of the Constitutional Convention. Madison encouraged pluralism as a solution to the majority rule versus minority rights, meaning that if enough groups had a connection to the political system there would not be one group that had dominant rule. A majority that was only interested in their rights could potentially steam roll the minority party’s rights. If there were too many small groups trying to obtain protection from the government for their own rights any power the democracy had would be…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays