Preview

Federalist No. 39: The Conformity Of The Plan To Republican Principles

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist No. 39: The Conformity Of The Plan To Republican Principles
The main purpose of Federalist NO. 39: The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles was to determine whether the general form and aspect of the government was strictly republican. Madison states that no other form of government, other than Republic would be compatible with the “genius of the people of America” and the “fundamental principles of the Revolution”. He then defines republic government, which is a type of government that derives it power indirectly or directly from the people; the government is administered by people who hold public office for a limited period of time or during good behavior. Madison thinks that the Constitution complies with the rules of a republican form of government. Some other people, doesn’t agree with
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Essay
    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Essay

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist No. 72 By Alexander Hamilton
    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of The Federalist No. 72 By Alexander Hamilton

    In the Federalist No. 72, Alexander Hamilton states that re-eligibility should be ensured in order to prevent an executive from extending his term in office unconstitutionally. Hamilton presents five effects that would occur if a president would only be allowed to serve for a single term. Some of the effects that Hamilton presented are, a reduction in the president’s motivation to be on his best behavior since he would not be concerned about getting re-elected. Another issue that would result if re-eligibility would be denied is that if a president who holds office is obsessed with wealth he might get involved in corruption since he would soon be prohibited from office. The author’s purpose is to establish re-eligibility in order for an executive…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist Paper 51: AP Government
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist Paper 51: AP Government

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Madison And Reinhold Niebuhr
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Madison And Reinhold Niebuhr

    Madison speaks in favor of expanding the role of the federal government because he believes that to do so would improve the quality of…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist No. 39 Summary
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Federalist No. 39 Summary

    The Federalist No. 39 “The conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles,” is the thirty-ninth of The Federalist Papers and was published by James Madison on January 18, 1788. Madison defines what a Republican form of government is considered, which was what the nation was currently called. It also considers whether the nation is federal or national: a confederacy, or consolidation of states. At the current moment the nation was considered Federal and states were confederate, but they were leaning towards A National government. (federal vs. national government.) Madison then defines what republic means and states three rules which must comply to be considered a Republic:…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47 and 48 Responses
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist 47 and 48 Responses

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary Of Federalist No. 10
    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Federalist No. 10

    “A tax loophole is something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it is tax reform,” proclaimed Russell B. Long in 1975. Tax reform is a congressional argument as old as the United States itself. No generation is immune to this fight, as everyone says they are paying too many taxes while the other guy pays too few. Fundamentally, the tax code divides people into categories, by wealth or lifestyle, and determines what taxes and deductions they shall receive.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Madison's Response To More Government Power
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is Madison's Response To More Government Power

    In James Madison’s The Federalist 10 and 51, he argues for more government power over the people. He explains that factions might come up and infringe on the rights of other citizens and giving the government more power will help these factions stay under control. He argues that factions or “men of factitious tempers…may by intrigue, by corruption, or by other means, first obtain the suffrages, and then betray the interests, of the people…” Madison believed greatly in the powers for the government and we see this where he says “But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” He doesn’t just say to give the government unlimited power but also says that “the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” He argued for more power to the government but also wanted the government to not be corrupt.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 9 Analysis
    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist 9 Analysis

    Within the federalist papers, there is discussion of improvements in political science in republican government. Publius first discusses improvements in political science in regards to an extended republic in Federalist 9, then builds on his arguments in Federalist 10 and 51. In Federalist 9, there are five specific improvements to the science of politics that are discussed. These improvements are separation of powers, legislative checks and balances, an independent judiciary, representation, and, perhaps most importantly, the idea of an extended republic. Federalist 9 also speaks heavily of how these advances of political science reduce the natural imperfections of republican government. Voting on legislation is done via representation, in…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Founding Fathers Give To American Power
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Founding Fathers Give To American Power

    These resolutions say that it is the state’s duty to restrain the centralized government’s power, and the states should not allow the Federal government to have any more power than what was explicitly provided to it in the Constitution. This ultimately allowed the Federal government to do what it was intended to do and nothing more- regulate, not rule. Once the Constitution was ratified and the Federal government was established, Madison began to lose his belief in pro-banking Federalism. He then met with Jefferson, and later helped found the Democratic-Republican Party. In 1790, Hamilton’s Assumption Bill was at a Congressional stalemate.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalists Argumentative Analysis
    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    The folk behind the Federalist movement included farmers on the frontier, businessmen near navigable water or involved in interstate trade, minorities whose rights were unprotected by the states, and slaveholders who realized the benefits of the Three Fifths Clause. Furthermore, many of the important faces of the American Revolution, including George Washington and Ben Franklin, were Federalists and helped sway a public that held them up to be godly figures of early republic. Madison’s anonymous papers such as Federalist 10 helped the party to dominate a Federalist-friendly press and have their ideas spread throughout the country. In Federalist 10, Madison turns a what Antifederalists view as negative aspect of the Constitution, a consolidated government over an immense land, and turns it into a remarkable bonus that avoids any faction getting an upper hand. Madison considers that men of a majority will oppress the minority if “the impulse and opportunity coincide” and that “neither moral nor religious motives can be relied on as an adequate control” to these urges. Therefore, a government that is divided up into many factions can have no one ruling majority and in turn, no group will predominantly sway to oppress a minority. Madison then continues on to say how a “pure democracy” of a small number of citizens can “admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction” because on such a small scale, nearly everyone, besides the minority, will belong to the same faction and in turn, the majority. To combat the problems of a strong majority, Madison argues that the elected officials will “discern the true interest of their country” and will avoid the temptation to succumb to the needs of “temporary or partial considerations.” Madison worked to find a balance in the number of representatives…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics