8. In the novel Krakaauer identifies how publication was response of this article. There were various responses: some reader admired his courage and noble ideals; others thought he was an idiot, a narcissist who is full of arrogance and stupidity – and didn’t worth the media’s attentions. The novel specifically states, “ This correspondence, as one might expect, reflected sharply divergent points of view: Some readers admired the boy immensely of his courage and noble ideals; others fulminated that he was a reckless idiot, a wacko, a narcissist who perished out of arrogance and stupidity – and was underserving of the considerable media attention he received.” (Krakuer). The novel specifically mentions that there were different points of view: some readers admired him and others thought he was an idiot, narcissist and didn’t deserve the considerable attentions he received from media.
Chapter One1. In the novel Krakauer identifies the specific incident that Chapter One begins with. Chapter One begins with the introduction of the men called Jim Gallien and how he meets Alex (the hitchhiker) while he is driving. The novel specifically states, “Jim Gallien had driven four miles out of Fairbanks when he spotted the hitchhiker standing in the snow beside the road, thumb raised high, shivering in the gray Alaska dawn.” (Krakauer). The novel specifically identifies that Chapter One begins with the men called Jim Gallien and how he meets the protagonist Alex. 2. In the novel Krakauer identifies who is Jim Gallien. Jim Gallien is an electrician, is on his way to Anchorage, he is also an accomplished hunter and woodsman. The novel specifically states, “ Gallien, a union electrician, was on his way to Anchorage,” “…which struck Gallien – an accomplished hunter and woodsman…” (Krakauer 4). The novel specifically mentions that Jim Gallien is an electrician, as well as an accomplished hunter and woodsman.3. In the novel Krakauer identifies the specifically spot Gallien drops Alex off. Gallien drops Alex off at the crest of a low rise that located ten miles from the highway. The novel specifically states, “ Ten miles from the highway, worried that he’d get stuck if he drove farther, Gallien stopped his rig on the crest of a low rise.” (Krakauer 7). The novel specifically mentions that Gallien drops Alex off at the crest of a low rise, which is ten miles from the highway.4. In the novel Krakauer identifies what Alex insists on giving to Gallien. Alex insists on giving Gallien his watch, comb and all his money. The novel specifically states, “Alex insisted on giving Gallien his watch, his comb, and what he said was all his money: eighty-five cents in loose change.” (Krakauer 7). The novel specifically mentions that Alex insists on give Gallien his watch, comb and money. 5. In the novel Krakauer identifies what three specific things Gallien gives to Alex. Gallien gives Alex a pair of boots, a paper with his phone number and some food: two grilled-cheese-and-tuna sandwiches and a bag of corn chips. The novel specifically states, “Gallien reached behind the seat, pulled out an old pair of rubber work boots and persuaded the boy to take them.” “Then he gave the kid a slip of paper with his phone number on it.” “Gallien’s wife had packed him two grilled-cheese-and-tuna sandwiched and a bag of corn chips for lunch; he persuaded the young hitchhiker to accept the food as well.”(Krakauer 7). The novel specifically mentions that Gallien gives Alex a pair of boots, a paper with his phone number and some food.6. In the novel Krakauer identifies the date of this occurrence in Chapter One. The date of this occurrence is Tuesday, April 28, 1992. The novel specifically states, “ Then, smiling broadly, he disappeared down the snow-covered track. The date was Tuesday, April 28, 1992.” (Krakauer). The novel specifically identifies the date of this occurrence is Tuesday, April 28, 1992. Chapter Two1. In the novel Krakauer identifies the author Alex thought was “King”. Alex thought Jack London was “King”. The novel specifically states, “ Jack London is King Alexander Supertramp May 1992 ” (Krakauer). The novel specifically mentions Jack London was the author that Alex thought was “King”.2. In the novel Krakauer identifies the date the Stampede Trail was blazed. The Stampede Trail was blazed in the 1930s. The novel specifically states, “ The trail was blazed in the 1930s by a legendary Alaska miner named Earl Pilgrim; ” (Krakauer 10). The novel specifically identifies the trail was blazed in the 1930s.3. In the novel Krakauer identifies the reason why a junked bus ended up about half way up the trail. A junked bus ended up about half way up the trail was because Yutan Company decided to leave that bus as a backcountry shelter for hunters and trappers. The novel specifically states, “ Yutan hauled two of the buses back to the hightway. The third bus was left about half way out the trail to serve as backcountry shelter for hunters and trappers. ” (Krakauer 10). The novel specifically identifies a junked bus ended up about half way up the trail was because it was left as a shelter for hunters and trappers. 4. In the novel Krakauer identifies who typically pays a visit to the old bus. A minority of hunters typically pays a visit to the old bus when moose season comes in the fall. The novel specifically states, “ As soon as moose season opens in the fall, a handful of hunters typically pays a visit to the old bus, ” (Krakauer 11). The novel specifically mentions a minority of hunters typically pays a visit to the old bus.5. In the novel Krakauer identifies what those “visitors” found when they arrived at the bus in September 1992. Those “visitors” found a guy and a girl from Anchorage standing fifty feet away, looking kinda scary. The novel specifically states, “ When they got there, according to Thompson, they found ‘ a guy and a girl from Anchorage standing fifty feet away, looking kinda spooked. ” (Krakauer 12). The novel specifically states those “visitors” found a guy and a girl form Anchorage standing fifty feet away and looking kinda scary. 6. In the novel Krakauer identifies where McCandless’ body was taken. McCandless’ body was taken at the other side of the bus where was opposite to the side that the sleeping bag was. The novel specifically states, “ Samel continues, ‘reached through a back window, and gave the bag a shake. There was definitely something in it, but whatever it was didn’t weigh much. It wasn’t until I walked aroung to the other side and saw a head sticking out that I know for certain what it was.’ ” (Krakauer 13). The novel specifically states McCandless’ body was taken at the other side of the bus.7. In the novel Krakauer identifies what the autopsy revealed and what the most probable cause of death was. The autopsy revealed that there was no sign of internal injuries or broken bones but there was no subcutaneous fat remained in the body, the muscles had withered badly before he dead as well, also McCandless only weighed sixty-seven pounds when his body was found; the autopsy deemed the most probable cause of his death was starvation. The novel specifically states, “but the coroner could find no sign of massive internal injuries or broken bones. Virtually no subcutaneous fat remained on the body, and the muscles had withered significantly in the days or weeks prior to death. At the time of the autopsy, McCandless's remains weighed sixty-seven pounds. Starvation was posited as the most probable cause of death. ” (Krakauer 13 14). The novel specifically mentions the autopsy revealed that McCandless didn’t have any internal injuries but he had no subcutaneous fat left and his remains were extremely light. The autopsy thought the most probably cause of death was starvation. 8. In the novel Krakuaer identifies why the authorities could not identify the body. The authorities could not identify the body was because McCandless did not have any identification with him. The novel specifically states, “ But because he had been carrying no identification, the authorities didn't know who he was, where he was from, or why he was there. ” (Krakauer 14). The novel specifically mentions that because McCandless did not carry any identification with him, the authorities could not identify the body.Chapter Three1. In the novel Krakauer identifies the location of Carthage and how big it is. Carthage is in South Dakota with the population of 274. The novel specifically states, “ Carthage, South Dakota, population 274, ” (Krakauer). The novel specifically identifies Carthage is in South Dakota and has 274 people live there.2. In the novel Krakauer identifies the person Wayne Westerberg. Wayne Westerberg is a hyperkinetic man who owns two grain elevators, one is in Carthage and another one a few miles out of town. The novel specifically states, “Westerberg, a hyperkinetic man with thick shoulders and a black goatee, owns a grain elevator in Carthage and another one a few miles out of town but spends every summer running a custom combine crew that follows the harvest from Texas north to the Canadian border.” (Krakauer 16). The novel specifically identifies Wayne Westerberg us a hyperkinetic man who owns two grain elevators.3. In the novel Krakauer identifies how and when Westerberg first met Alex. Westerberg first met Alex on the afternoon of September 10 and he stopped the car for Alex who was a hitchhiker while he was driving put of Cut Bank. The novel specifically states, “On the afternoon of September 10, driving out of Cut Bank after buying some parts for a malfunctioning combine, he pulled over for a hitchhiker, an amiable kid who said his name was Alex McCandless ” (Krakauer 16). The novel specifically identifies Westerberg first met Alex on September 10 and he pulled over for him.4. In the novel Krakauer identifies what kind of workers Alex was according to Westerberg. Westerberg thought Alex was the hardest worker he ever met; he would do every job no matter how dirty he would be after the day; he never give up in the middle of something, also he was extremely ethical and has a high standards for himself. The novel specifically states, “He was the hardest worker I've ever seen. Didn't matter what it was, he'd do it: hard physical labor, mucking rotten grain and dead rats out of the bottom of the hole—jobs where you'd get so damn dirty you couldn't even tell what you looked like at the end of the day. And he never quit in the middle of something. If he started a job, he'd finish it. It was almost like a moral thing for him. He was what you'd call extremely ethical. He set pretty high standards for himself. ” (Krakauer 18). The novel specifically identifies Westerberg thought Alex was the hardest worker he ever seen with all the other good characters.5. In the novel Krakauer identifies how Westerberg discoverd Alex’s real name. Westerberg found out Alex’s real name was actually Chris from a tax form. The novel specifically states, “At one point Westerberg discovered from a tax form that McCandless's real name was Chris, not Alex.” (Krakauer 18). The novel specifically identifies Westerberg discovered Alex’s real name from a tax form.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In Chapter 6, Krakauer describes McCandless’s relationship with a U.S. Veteran named Ronald Franz. While Franz is fighting in the Vietnam War, his wife and son are killed in a tragic car accident and Franz turns to alcohol. However, he quits drinking and manages to turn his life around. While living in Salton Sea, CA, Franz picks up a hitchhiker who turns out to be Chris. Chris has set up camp on the edge of the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park and Franz is living in an apartment complex that he manages.…
- 196 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
I trust Krakauer's motivation in composing the book was to clearly impart McCandless' story to the world. The possibility of totally isolating oneself from society is an insane suspected that entrances numerous. By composing this book he is carry on McCandless' story and giving knowledge on the trials and encounters of a current visionary. I think in a few perspectives he conveys some one-sided on the grounds that all through the book he will clarify how something has identified with his life or how he by and by interfaces with Chris. With this one could perceive how there is space for inclination. This could influence the audience on the grounds that with Chris' imput it could give the peruser an assumption before they for their own assessment. Krakauer utilizes this type of media to instruct and educate the gathering of people of the visionary life and Chris' story, "Chris had lived off campus in a monkish room furnished with little more than a thin mattress on the floor, milk crates, and a table.” (Krakauer 22). Krakauer's depiction of his way of life is intended to educate the audience of the moderate way of…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In your last paper you were asked to consider the possible motivation behind Chris McCandless's decision to abandon conventional knowledge. For this paper we are going to examine the excerpt from Krakauer's book in a new light-in relation to Malcolm Gladwell's ideas. In his chapter, "The Power of Context," Malcolm Gladwell argues for another way to understand one's relation to "meaning" and knowledge. While Gladwell looks at the epidemic of crime in New York City in the mid 1980s and the dramatic drop in crime rates a decade later and Jon Krakauer ruminates on a young man's "strange spiritual quest" (Krakauer 420) into the Alaskan wilderness, both authors contemplate the nature of "character". One seemingly…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Finally in Chapter 8, the reader is given insight into the types of letters Krakauer received, after having previously written an article about McCandless, with most of the incoming mail giving harsh criticism on the young traveler's story for being mentally ill, and unprepared. Yet McCandless isn’t the only one to go off on to a far fetched adventure out into the Alaskan wilderness, as one school teacher put it, with Krakauer offering three other examples of others with stories like McCandless. These other stories of Rosellini, Waterman, and McCunn, also prove Christopher McCandless’s uniqueness despite there being similarities between him and of the many others who shared the same philosophy as McCandless. Different in a sense that McCandless,…
- 144 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In the book Into the Wild, the author identifies the theme of McCandless’ elusiveness of his identity leading to the isolation of himself, resulting in costing him his life. Krakauer continuously writes about how McCandless wants to find his identity through traveling and exploring the world and what it has to offer. Though his travels, McCandless finds that in order to achieve in discovering himself, he must dis-attach himself from any relationship he has with anyone and can only stay in places for two weeks at a time. While affable with the strangers he meets on the road, McCandless breaks off all contact with his family. This isolation is a key component in the story, and therefore is also a huge part of the theme. Motifs used in the book…
- 323 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this chapter it talks about how Mr. McCandless had stopped traveling for quite a period of a time to be precise he spent a little over two months in one place, Bullhead city this however happened to be the longest time Mr. McCandless ever ‘settled down.’ In the excerpt The dominant primordial beast was strong in Buck, and under the fierce conditions of trail life it grew and grew. Yet it was a Secret growth. His newborn cunning gave him poise and control. It bears relevance to this chapter because it describes Chris McCandless as he was ‘charging up’ for his next big adventure and try to save up some money for the big trip to Alaska, but ended up cherishing Bullhead city and decides maybe perhaps he should stick around for a bit build some more traits, learn new things, we know this because he had written a letter to Wayne Westerberg, he took a strong liking to the city and decided to enjoy his stay. I believe that this reference, yet was a secret growth. His newborn cunning gave him poise and control. Reflects on the responsibility he took on during those two months in Bullhead city. Chris took into consideration that he might actually settle down and considered ending his ‘tramping life’. In referring to the quote “Yet was a secret growth.” McCandless had also held his job at the local McDonald’s, he even went as far as opening a savings account at the local bank. Chris had tried to hide the person he actually was. He tried to hide the fact that he was a traveler or explorer who had been living out of his backpack and did not know where he would end up the next day. I was really convinced that Mr. McCandless was going to continue his life in AZ, but before the audience got comfortable with the idea of Chris McCandless settling down and starting a new life for himself boom Chris suddenly gets the urges to be on the move again and decides to leave Bullhead…
- 1668 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The documentary Return to the Wild debates the two very different argued reasons of why Chris McCandless went into the wild. The writers choose to uncover the dark secrets of the McCandless family and to reveal the truth as to why Chris travelled into the Alaskan wilderness. The documentary adopts an intense tone in the beginning that shifts to a more light hearted attitude throughout the second half of the film using symbolism, cinematography, audio, and various interviews in order to explain to the viewers the grim childhood McCandless experienced and events that led him into the barren wilderness of Alaska.…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The ability to view an author’s unpublished draft can be described as to viewing the author’s journey can also observe what message is trying to be displayed through the text. Upon observation of The Road and the unpublished draft “The Grail”, I have concluded that there are two key differences that create an concrete analysis of Cormac McCarthy’s progression of his work that show the mother scene shift from mortal anxiety to rationalization of the mother’s actions and reasons for her decisions.…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Krakauer was able to reveal the dynamics of an adolescent’s characterization and how they develop in understanding the reality of society. The subjectivity was truly relevant to the piece to understand the daring minds of those who wants to establish a connection with nature and helps those audience members who shame them to psychologically enter the mind of a hiker in a journey of self-discovery and…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever wondered what it would be like to take on an adventure like McCandless or McCunn? These two men had a mind set to explore nature and its beauty and to survive. However these two men had many similarity as well as difference. Throughout the book “Into the Wild” this was displayed.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Jon Krakauer, the author of Into the Wild, and Chris McCandless, the main character, share very similar stories and personalities. The best was in which these similarities are depicted is in chapters 14 and 15, when Krakauer inserts himself into the story. In these chapters Krakauer highlights a lot of parallels between himself and McCandless and through these highlights we can look at Krakauer as a credible biographer because he has a deeper understand for McCandless’s motivations.…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Into the World involves transition and change. Discuss noting the composer’s representation of these ideas. Refer to your prescribed text and one related text.…
- 1295 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
To Chris McCandless and many others of his ilk like Henry Thoreau and Jack London,the wilderness of the west has a very specific allure. McCandless sees the wilderness as a purer state, a place free of the evils of modern society, where someone like him can find out what he is really made of, live by his own rules, and be completely free. Yet, it is also true that the reality of day-to-day living in the wilderness is not as romantic as he and others like him imagine it to be. Perhaps this explains why many of his heroes who wrote about the wilderness, for example, Jack London, never actually spent much time living in it.…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Was the media attention he received undeserving or unnecessary when the turned up of McCandless in Alaska the media report said “many people concluded that the boy must have been mentally disturbed” (70). Basically what they are saying that McCandless was mentally ill because the people within that area knew the dangers of going out there unprepared like he was and no one would dare to go. However, no one understands the decision or knowing his reason for wanting to go out to Alaska like that. All the people did know and did was criticized and not try to understand that it is his life and decision. However, there were some positive people that found his advantage as inspires McCandless inspired Ron Franz for example McCandless told Franz to “get out of Salton city and hit the road” (57). Franz took it to thought and went to take a look at nature for himself what it’s like. He not only inspired Franz but others with his story of the adventures he has came across to live and see the world in a different point of view.As well the readers know McCandless well educated guy he did do some very reckless choices. Example would be when Gallien offer McCandles (Alex) to buy him gear Alex replied “I’ll be fine with what I’ve got” (6). What was so wrong accepting the help from someone that want the trip for Alex to be safe and not die. Everyone had much opinion if McCandless was a reckless idiot smart mentally ill etc. However, was McCandless mentally ill “in the ways of the backcountry, and incautious to the point of foolhardiness, he wasn’t incompetent – he wouldn’t have lasted 113 day if he were” (85). Based on McCandless lasting 113 days I think he was not mentally ill but smart because no one can survive that long without any equipment like he did. So is Alex really as dumb or mentally ill as people say? I say not because he just wanted to get away from society because people are so caught up with money and Alex…
- 353 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Before Grimm, before Supernatural, and even before Wicked, there was one “reimagining of classic fairy tales with interwoven plots and grey scale characters” and that was Into the Woods by Stephen Sondheim. Sondheim uses four familiar stories to set the scene for his overarching plot allowing him to concentrate on jokes and creating new relationships between old characters. He also uses familiar characters in ways that blend categories. Through much of act one every character is stock through and through, yet by the end of the play our dashing prince charming has become an unapologetic adulterer, and the wicked old witch becomes an anti-hero. In addition to plot and character Sondheim pays special attention to his musical numbers; just from the first number we understand the characters relationships to one another, their motivations (having children, going to the festival, visiting grandma, and not starving), and we’re introduced to the play’s key metaphor: the woods. While these aspects were vital to the performances success I will be concentrating on the diction and acting.…
- 694 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays