Indian Democracy at Crossroad
Avinash Shankar MAD12015
Politics Essay: 2
Topic
Can post-colonial India 's political experience be characterized as moving towards becoming more democratic
Democracy, the form of government where supreme power is directly or indirectly vested in people, has become a global discourse that can be gauged from the fact that many post-colonial countries have adopted it with remarkable success. The dramatic global expansion of democracy in the last few decades in post-colonial countries speak volume of this most popular form of representative government. The ever fluctuating political dynamics coupled with changing socio-economic patterns since Independence has given new meanings to Indian democracy at each stage of its progression. India inherited a colonial state and kept much of its functioning architecture intact. Much of state practice, despite its massive quantitative expansion, is heavily governed by legislation passed somewhere between 1860 and 1947. During the 65-years of long journey, India as a nation has witnessed moments wherein democracy looked to find its true meaning, while moments like national emergency during Indira Gandhi’s regime qualify as the abysmal low that India touched as democratic nation. Adoption of socialist pattern, the middle path between capitalism and communism, at the early stage of our independence and a series of economic reforms that began in 1980s were primarily targeted at delivering the true essence of democracy in social, economic, and political spheres. This paper is an attempt to answer how Abraham Lincoln’s notion of democracy as a government of the people, by the people and for the people has been put to test in India on different social, political, and economic parameters at different stages of its progression since independence and whether ever changing political, social and economic
Politics Essay: 2
Topic
Can post-colonial India 's political experience be characterized as moving towards becoming more democratic
Democracy, the form of government where supreme power is directly or indirectly vested in people, has become a global discourse that can be gauged from the fact that many post-colonial countries have adopted it with remarkable success. The dramatic global expansion of democracy in the last few decades in post-colonial countries speak volume of this most popular form of representative government. The ever fluctuating political dynamics coupled with changing socio-economic patterns since Independence has given new meanings to Indian democracy at each stage of its progression. India inherited a colonial state and kept much of its functioning architecture intact. Much of state practice, despite its massive quantitative expansion, is heavily governed by legislation passed somewhere between 1860 and 1947. During the 65-years of long journey, India as a nation has witnessed moments wherein democracy looked to find its true meaning, while moments like national emergency during Indira Gandhi’s regime qualify as the abysmal low that India touched as democratic nation. Adoption of socialist pattern, the middle path between capitalism and communism, at the early stage of our independence and a series of economic reforms that began in 1980s were primarily targeted at delivering the true essence of democracy in social, economic, and political spheres. This paper is an attempt to answer how Abraham Lincoln’s notion of democracy as a government of the people, by the people and for the people has been put to test in India on different social, political, and economic parameters at different stages of its progression since independence and whether ever changing political, social and economic
Bibliography: 1. Mehta, P. B., The Burden of Democracy . Penguin Books, New Delhi, 2003 2 5. Kaviraj, Sudipta, “A critique of the Passive Revolution,” Economics and Political Weekly 23 (Nov 1988): 2433 6 7. Ganguly, Sumit, Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F., The State of India’s Democracy , Oxford University Press, 2009 8 9. Mehta, P. B., The Burden of Democracy , Penguin Books, New Delhi, 2003 10 21. Atul Kohli, ed., “The Success of India’s Democracy,” Cambridge University Press, New Delhi, 2011 -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. P. B. Mehta, The Burden of Democracy (Penguin Books, New Delhi, 2003), 106-107 [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. F. R. Frankel, India 's political economy, 1947-2004: The Gradual Revolution (London: Oxford University Press, 2005), 25 [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. Sudipta kaviraj. “A critique of the Passive Revolution,” Economics and Political Weekly 23 (Nov 1988): 2433 [ 6 ] [ 7 ]. Sumit Ganguly, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, The State of India’s Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2009), xviii-xix [ 8 ] [ 9 ]. P. B. Mehta, The Burden of Democracy (Penguin Books, New Delhi, 2003), 168-169 [ 10 ] [ 13 ]. Sumit Ganguly, “The Crisis of Indian Secularism,” Journal of Democracy 14 (October 2003): 11-25 [ 14 ] [ 19 ]. Sumit Ganguly, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, The State of India’s Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2009), 49 [ 20 ] [ 21 ]. Atul Kohli, ed., “The Success of India’s Democracy (Cambridge University Press, New Delhi, 2011), 211