Measuring the Quality of Early Intervention Services for Infants and Toddlers: problems and prospects
SUSAN KONTOS* & KAREN DIAMOND
Department of Child Development and Family Studies, 1269 Fowler House, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907–1269, USA
Comparable scales to measure quality of early intervention services for infants and toddlers as perceived by parents and service providers were developed based on the Recommended Practices in Early Intervention. Each scale consisted of four subscales focusing on: home-based therapies/instruction, centre-based therapies/instruction, medical/ health services, and service coordination. The scales were administered to 209 parents and 177 of their service providers. A sample of 24 parents completed the instrument twice during a two-week interval to assess test–retest reliability of the parent scale. Test–retest reliability for the parent scale was .785. Validity of the scale was assessed by examining the correlation of parent and provider perceptions of quality with family demographic and early intervention service characteristics. Parents’ perceptions of quality were related to family centredness of services. Neither parents’ nor providers’ perceptions of quality were related to family socioeconomic status. Problems and prospects for measuring quality of early intervention services are discussed.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of the Study There is consistent evidence that the effects of early childhood programs on children’s development are moderated by the quality of the program. In other words, children’s development is enhanced when they attend high quality programs and hindered by low quality programs (Helburn, 1995; Kontos, Howes, Galinsky, & Shinn, 1994; Whitebook, Howes, & Phillips, 1989). The samples on which these ndings are based, however, are exclusively typically developing children in regular early childhood programs
References: ABBOT-SHIM, M. & SIBLEY, A. (1987). Assessment Pro le for Early Childhood Programs. Atlanta, GA: Quality Assist. 350 S. Kontos & K. Diamond AYTCH, L., CRYER, D., BAILEY, D. & SALZ, L. (1999). De ning and assessing quality in early intervention programs for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families: Challenges and unresolved issues. Early Education and Development, 18, 7–23. B AILEY , D.B. (1991). FOCAS: Family orientation of community and agency services. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center. BAILEY, D., CLIFFORD, R. & HARMS, T. (1982). Comparison of preschool environments for handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2, 9–20. BAILEY, D. & MCWILLIAM, P.J. (1993). The search for quality indicators. In P.J. MCWILLIAM & D. BAILEY (Eds.), Working together for children and families: Case studies in early intervention (pp. 1–20). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. BAILEY, D., MCWILLIAM, R., BUYSSE, V. & WESLEY, P. (1998). Inclusion in the context of competing values in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 27–47. CRYER, D. & BURCHINAL, M. (1997). Parents as child care consumers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 35–58. DEC Task Force on Recommended Practices (1993). DEC Recommended Practices: Indicators of quality in programs for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Reston, VA: The Council for Exception Children. G ILKERSON, L., GORKSI, P. & PANITZ, P. (1990). Hospital-based intervention. In S. MEISELS & J. SHONKOFF (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (pp. 445–468). New York: Cambridge University Press. G RAHAM, M. & BRYANT, D. (1993). Characteristics of quality, effective service delivery systems for children with special needs. In D. BRYANT & M. GRAHAM (Eds.), Implementing early intervention (pp. 233–252). New York: Guilford Press. HARMS, T. & CLIFFORD, R. (1990). Family Day Care Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press. HARMS, T. & CLIFFORD, R. (1998). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale–Revised. New York: Teachers College Press. HARMS, T., CRYER, D. & CLIFFORD, R. (1990). Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press. HELBURN, S. (Ed.) (1995). Cost, quality, and child outcomes in child care centers: Final report. Denver, CO: University of Colorado at Denver, Economics Department. HOLLINGSHEAD, A.B. (1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT. HYSON, M., HIRSCH-PASEK K. & RESCORLA, L. (1990). The Classroom Practices Inventory: An observation instrument based on NAEYC’s guidelines for developmentally appropriate practices for 4- and 5-year-old children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 475–494. KONTOS, S., HOWES, G., G ALINSKY, E. & SHINN , M. (1994). Quality in family child care and relative care. New York: Teachers College Press. LAPARO, K., SEXTON, D. & SNYDER, P. (1998). Program quality characteristics in segregated and inclusive early childhood settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 27–47. MCBRIDE, S. (1999). Research in review: Family-centered practice. Young Children, 54, 62–68. MCWILLIAM , P.J. & MCWILLIAM , R.A. (1993). Brass Tacks. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center. MCWILLIAM , R., LANG, L., VANDIVIERE , P., ANGELL, R., COLLINS , L. & U NDERDOWN , G. (1995). Satisfaction and struggles: Family perceptions of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 43–60. MCWILLIAM , R. & SNYDER, P. (1995, April). Measurement of family-centeredness in early intervention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. Measuring Quality 351 ODOM , S. & MCLEAN, M. (Eds.) (1996). Early intervention/early childhood special education recommended practices. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. ODOM , S., MCLEAN, M., JOHNSON, L. & LAMONTAGNE, M. (1995). Recommended practices in early childhood special education: Validation and current use. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 1–17. WHITEBOOK, M., HOWES, C. & PHILLIPS , D. (1989). Who cares: Child care teachers and the quality of care in America. Oakland, CA: Child Care Employee Project.