Inspection And Conviction Essay

The personal constitution protects privacy, the right of every citizen to be free from irrational government interference in their persons, homes, businesses and property - whether through police detain citizens on the street, arrests or searches of homes and business. Lawmakers and courts have put in place legal safeguards to ensure that law enforcement officials interfere with the rights of individuals under the Fourth Amendment only in limited circumstances, and through specific methods. In the area of criminal law, the Fourth Amendment "Inspection and Confiscation" extends to: physical arrest of a law enforcement officer or "confiscation" of a person by arrest or arrest. The police will inspect places and objects in a person who has legitimate
However, in most cases, a police officer may not register or detain a person or property unless the officer has: a valid arrest warrant, a valid arrest warrant, or a belief that level of "probable cause" committed by the individual. When police officers violate the constitutional rights of an individual under the Fourth Amendment and search or seizure is illegal, any evidence derived from such investigation or detention will certainly remain outside of any criminal case against the person whose rights have been violated. For example, the arrest was found to violate the Fourth Amendment because it was not supported by a possible cause or a valid order. Any evidence obtained through such unlawful detention, such as confession, will remain out of the case. The police searched for a house in violation of the rights of the owner of the fourth amendment house, because no order was issued and any special circumstance was justified in the search. Any evidence obtained as a result of that search can’t be used against the homeowner in a criminal