Preview

Case Law: Payton V. New York

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
397 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Law: Payton V. New York
Sometimes an arrest has to be made in a protected place such as someone’s home. Under the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their homes (Hall, 2014). Therefore they are protected places and a warrant would be required to legally enter and make an arrest unless the officer could justify an exception (Hall, 2014). The Fourth Amendment also specifically states that an arrest warrant must be based on probable cause and supported by oath or affirmation (Hall, 2014). It further stipulates that people to be seized must be specifically addressed in the warrant (Hall, 2014).

In a 1980 case law, Payton v. New York, an arrest warrant allows an officer to enter a home to effect an arrest as long as there is reason to believe


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R15523, 17425. Rivera now said he was walking on Hickory Street when Holly Staker, who was wearing a sleeveless shirt and a pair of tight shorts, invited him up to the apartment. Rivera said it was dark in the apartment and a little boy and girl were playing inside. Id. At one point, Holly Staker changed the little girl’s diaper. Rivera stated that Holly Staker then changed into a nightgown and tried to seduce him, but he resisted her advances. At this point, the little boy went outside to play. Rivera continued that Holly Staker persisted in her sexual advances and they had intercourse, although he did not think he ejaculated because he was concerned about pregnancy. The sexual activity was interrupted when the little girl cried in the next room, and Rivera decided he did not want to continue. At this point, according to Rivera’s statement, Holly Staker got angry that he refused to continue having sex and brandished a knife, which she began swinging at Rivera. Rivera said he grabbed her arms and started punching her without realizing the knife was cutting her. He did not know how many times he cut her, but it was more than twice. Rivera stated that he washed the knife and his hands near the kitchen sink and ran out the back door of the apartment. He threw the knife, which he had broken into two pieces, to the ground. Rivera said he then went home and burned his clothes in the dumpster behind his house, after which he walked back to Hickory Street and saw the police and the woman for whom Holly Staker was babysitting. R14617-25, 15475-84,…

    • 4813 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    -The fact that they had a warrant doesn’t mean they can go in with disregard to the procedure… the Constitution guarantees that the Gov. cannot enter your home w/o complying with…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The previous Courts argue that since the officers had an arrest warrant for the petitioner, it justified their searching of the home.…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attila Nagy 9/18/2017 ENC3465 Legal Brief 3 State of New York v. Robert Strong Facts Robert Strong belongs to the Sudan Muslim religious faith, which later named him one of the leaders. As part of a well-known ceremony, he performed a religious exercise on the victim by plunging three knives into his chest to stop his heartbeat and breathing without any health repercussion thereafter. Even though this has occurred for over forty years without any fatality, the victim did not survive this exercise. Issue Is the defendant, who fatally exercised his powers of “mind over matter” through plunging knives into victim’s chest for ceremonial purposes, guilty of manslaughter in the second degree? Rule…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Signifance: The 4th amendment prohibits the unlawful search and seizure of resident belonging to citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police did not conduct a lawful search and seizure under the guidelines set forth in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that search and seizure can occur during an arrest warrant that is being carried out but the "the area within control" of the suspect. The area within control was eventually decided as being the reach of arms length from the suspect. This is a lawful act designed to prevent the suspect from engaging in dangerous behavior towards others and also for the protection of any evidence the suspect may attempt to destroy. The suspect was not at the dwelling when officers arrived therefore no search and seizure should have taken place. Police officers were notified that the suspect was not present upon arrival and entry of the home. There were no reasonable causes for police to suspect that items dangerous to themselves were inside the home.…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wyoming V. Shatzer

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. The Supreme Court has previously held that if the police have probable cause to…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following paper reviews probable cause as it applies to the duties of law enforcement. We will review different scenarios involving probable cause and the different court rulings that govern police and other law enforcement officer’s procedures involving the searching of a residence, arresting offenders, and the use of warrants. Due, to the inconsistency and complexity involved in real life situations, a multiplicity of use involving warrants, probable cause, searches, and other police actions can occur.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheetum Case Summary

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. U.S. Const. amend. IV…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    united states supreme court ruled that police officers that have a warrant to arrest someone can enter a home just to arrest the person only if they have the reason to believe the person actually lives there. The same standard was applied for officers when they are conducting a parole or probation search. The…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In relation to the case at hand, Sue Davis (2008) notes that “the Fourth Amendment offers us considerably more protection when we are in our home—whether rented or owned—even the home of a friend where we are staying”. The 4th Amendment outlines three encounters between police and citizens as it relates to search and seizure. The third category of encounter between the police and citizens, a full-scale arrest, requires probable cause. When police act without a warrant, they…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government official does not have the right to go on the man’s property without a warrant. In 4th Amendment, it specifically says “ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue” it means that a government official can not go on your property, car or phone without probable cause.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Americans today don’t know what rights we are given. The Bill of Rights were put in place to give US citizens protection from corrupt police and government officials. A common Amendment that most Americans don’t realize we have is the Fourth amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives us protection against arbitrary searches and seizures without a proper warrant. It was first used to prevent the use of writs of assistance which is blanket search warrants with which the british custom officials had invaded homes to search for smuggled goods. As the fourth amendment has changed and evolved in its meaning over time, many Supreme Court cases have presented themselves to the states.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In most cases, the government can not enter my dwelling without a warrant. The Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights to protect the American people from their own government. One specific amendment, the Fourth Amendment, requires the federal government to get a warrant, signed by a judge, stating the area being searched, the person they are searching, or what they are going to search. There have been various occasions where the Fourth Amendment’s been brought up in court. Some of them include with federal agencies, Supreme Court cases, corporations, and well-known people.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays