Preview

Integrative Negotiation

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1369 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Integrative Negotiation
Integrative Negotiation

By

MGT 5193.E2 February 16, 2011

Definition of Integrative bargaining states that; it is a negotiation between the parties when the parties are not experiencing a direct conflict over an issue and they want to be benefitted from discussions(Negotiations betweena union…,n.d.). Integrative negotiation is a process in which the party’s goal is to develop a result which is benefitted to both of them. Integrative bargaining is also known as win-win negotiation.
Integrative bargaining is an alternate strategy to the distributive negotiation.
The main focus of integrative negotiation is that both parties work together to find the best possible result (Integrative negotiation is a strategy where… , n.d.). Integrative bargaining is also known as interest-based bargaining or win-win bargaining. This strategy solely focuses on creating mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the parties for example; needs, desires, and concerns (Spangler, 2003). It requires from both parties to put more effort than normal to understand the desires from deal. According to negotiation analyst integrative negotiation works best when parties put their focus on the major point of the deal, instead they came up with other unimportant points which can easily be trade off as part of the negotiating process (Integrative negotiation is a strategy where… , n.d.). Integrative negotiation can also be very difficult to approach because requires a considerable amount of compromise on both sides. Number of persons who are not use to work together should take negotiation as a team effort instead of competition. Integrative negotiation might seems as difficult process at first, but people who have experience with integrative negotiation find that it is a process which is beneficial for both sides (Integrative negotiation is a strategy where… , n.d.). In real world most negotiations

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    to ensure that they would be able to accommodate the needs of the position and the strict guidelines that must be adhered to. Also, using this method it will allow for the both of them to come to a common ground and listen to each other to see what will please him as well as the company. With integrative bargaining, the main goal is to achieve the win for both parties within the negotiation process. The text states that there are several key factors that should addressed in order to gain the win. One must creating a free flow of information, attempting to understand the other negotiator’s real needs and objectives, emphasizing commonalities between parties, and searching for solutions that meet the goals and objectives of both parties.(Lewicki, Saunders, Barry 2014). Creating a free flow of information allow Jim and Sharon to become creative in finds ways to communicate ways that his degree, knowledge and experience, that he has gain from other competitors can help Sharon and the company as a whole. In the negotiation process, it is important to understand the other party’s real needs and objectives so that everyone is clear on what the other expects and how they can both take advantage of a win-win situation. They must also search for solutions that are fair, ethical, firm yet flexible enough that the parties can see the benefit that can come from the negotiation.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HRM 595 Final Exam

    • 894 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Jack Johnson owns a 1998 Ford Mustang that he is looking to sell. He advertises in the Auto Trader. Mary Smith responds to his ad and expresses interest in purchasing the vehicle. Jack is asking $3500 for the car. Mary is looking to pay no more than $2500 for the vehicle. Would you describe this negotiation as a distributive or an integrative negotiation? Why? Jack has set $3500 as the price of his car but is willing to take $3000 for the vehicle. Anything under $3000 will not be accepted. Mary wants to pay $2500 for the car, but is willing to go up to $3000. Anything over $3000 will cause the deal to fail. Define and contrast the Walkaway Points, Target Points and Asking Price/Initial Offer of the parties. What are some of the strategies that could be used by each party to achieve the outcome they desire?…

    • 894 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would suggest the best negotiating style to apply to this will be collaborative style. Participation in joint problem solving is key for me. Secondly discovering and solving the real interest of both parties is another advantage of this style when applied to the case in question. Collaborative bargaining is a generic term that describes a variety of bargaining methods: win-win bargaining, collegial bargaining, consensus bargaining, cooperative bargaining, integrative bargaining, collective gaining and interest-based negotiations.They all involve a two-way discussion with the goal of mutual gains between the parties…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    turn up

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. The De Janasz chapter on negotiations describes two distinct approaches to bargaining: a “distributive bargaining strategy” and an “integrative bargaining strategy.” Describe at least one key difference between these two strategies. Then, describe an actual or hypothetical situation where adapting a distributive bargaining strategy would make the most sense (and why), as well as one where adopting an integrative bargaining strategy would make the most sense (and why).…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining," "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win" solution to their dispute. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the disputants. Interests include the needs, desires, concerns, and fears important to each side. They are the underlying…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The parties come to a mutual agreement that can be a win-win, also considered integrative…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are different approaches that can be taken to deal with stress caused by deadlines. Some conflicts that occur can have a functional outcome, but in some cases intervention is needed before dysfunction results. The first action to take would be to negotiate. Integrative bargaining is a bargaining technique that allows for a win-win result. Integrative bargaining includes sharing information that allows for each party to help come up with mutually beneficial outcomes. If there is conflict about deadlines that lead to stress, it is best to communicate about the deadlines and the differences of opinion that led to tension. Allowing each party to clarify and justify their side, helps to share viewpoints and come together on issues. Bargaining and problem solving is the part of the negotiation process that requires both parties…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negotiation Journal

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. 1) The discussion regarding distributive and integrative types of negotiation was an important learning I took from the class. Distributive negotiation aims for one sided gain, leaving the counterpart with less. Whereas, using an integrative approach allows a negotiation to reach a greater sum by actually creating value that might otherwise be left on the table.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Distributive and integrative bargaining requires different strategies, tactics and skill sets in a negotiator to be successfully implemented. Distributive bargaining is know as a win-lose situation based on a fixed amount that has to be divided, whereas integrative bargaining is a win-win situation based on a mutually satisfactory solution.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Putnam Reading summary

    • 2336 Words
    • 8 Pages

    - The negotiator seeks to find an agreement that will be attractive to his constituents (…

    • 2336 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Politics in organizations is an inseparable and ever-present part of modern work life. Contrary to generally held belief that business and politics don’t mix, power games and politics play a significant role in decision making and in routine affairs of an organization. Generally, words like politics and power have certain negativity attached to them but organizational politics, if understood and intelligently managed, can contribute constructively to working and performance of organizations. In the next sections we discuss organizational politics and it definition, political action and tactics. We also discuss briefly the related areas of impression management, conflict and negotiations.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Distributive bargaining

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Integrative bargaining is very different from Distributive bargaining. This method is also known as a win-win bargaining negotiation strategy for all parties involved. This approach allows both parties to collaborate to find a solution that will benefit them both equally based on the interests of the parties involved. Interests consist of the wants, needs, fears, and concerns significant to each side. These interests will be the underlying reasons why individuals become involved in a conflict or a disagreement. (Holley, Jennings, Wolters, 2012 pg.257) Integrative bargaining is significant for the reason that it will typically produce more acceptable results for the parties involved. Integrative solutions can possibly provide everyone involved with…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This involves negotiation of an issue on which both the parties may gain, or at least neither party loses. For example, representatives of employer and employee sides may bargain over the better training program me or a better job evaluation method. Here, both the parties are trying to make more of something. In general, it tends to be more cooperative than distributive bargaining. This type of bargaining is also known as cooperative bargaining.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negotation

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Integrative – Integrative negotiation involves a more collaborative approach, where both sides work together in the hopes of achieving the greatest possible benefit for both sides.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental elements of Getting to Yes are: people, interests, options, criteria, the BATNA principle, and soft versus hard bargaining style. The main points about people are that the research shows that negotiators are more likely to allocate resources equally, rather than selfishly. Also emotions not only affect the negotiator experiencing them, they can also create emotional reactions in other parties. Furthermore, what matters most in understanding conflict is not reality itself but individuals’ perceptions of it.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays