Preview

Distributive vs Integrative Bargaining

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Distributive vs Integrative Bargaining
Distributive and integrative bargaining requires different strategies, tactics and skill sets in a negotiator to be successfully implemented. Distributive bargaining is know as a win-lose situation based on a fixed amount that has to be divided, whereas integrative bargaining is a win-win situation based on a mutually satisfactory solution.

Distributive bargaining is most often referred to as a fixed pix negotiation. There is only so much to go around and it creates a competitive or sometimes argumentative negotiation with both sides vying to get the bigger share. This style negotiation is typically used between parties that have no prior history, and little likelihood of future negotiations. There are many different strategies used in a distributive negotiation, one of which is assessing the other party’s target and resistance points. This can be very hard for a negotiator to accomplish, as there is very little sharing of information in this style of negotiation. Both parties keep information to themselves, as they do not want the opposing side to be able to determine their room to maneuver in, as they want to get the best deal or bigger part of the pie for themselves. Along with this is a negotiating strategy is to manage the other party’s impressions; this can be done by passing along false information or incomplete information to keep another negotiator in the dark.

There are many different tactics used in distributive bargaining. One seen in different forms is the use of delaying tactics. This can be done two ways, first by having a negotiator that lacks the power to make a final decision. This adds more time to a negotiation while the agreement is presented to the person who has the authority to approve or reject the agreement. The second delay tactic is by delaying the negotiation past a deadline and thereby incurring a cost or penalty to the other negotiator. However, the most known type of distributive bargaining tactics is the use of hardball

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    to ensure that they would be able to accommodate the needs of the position and the strict guidelines that must be adhered to. Also, using this method it will allow for the both of them to come to a common ground and listen to each other to see what will please him as well as the company. With integrative bargaining, the main goal is to achieve the win for both parties within the negotiation process. The text states that there are several key factors that should addressed in order to gain the win. One must creating a free flow of information, attempting to understand the other negotiator’s real needs and objectives, emphasizing commonalities between parties, and searching for solutions that meet the goals and objectives of both parties.(Lewicki, Saunders, Barry 2014). Creating a free flow of information allow Jim and Sharon to become creative in finds ways to communicate ways that his degree, knowledge and experience, that he has gain from other competitors can help Sharon and the company as a whole. In the negotiation process, it is important to understand the other party’s real needs and objectives so that everyone is clear on what the other expects and how they can both take advantage of a win-win situation. They must also search for solutions that are fair, ethical, firm yet flexible enough that the parties can see the benefit that can come from the negotiation.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    City of Middlevale

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In negotiations there are key stakeholders. These are usually the parties that have the most to gain or lose in the…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HRM 595 Final Exam

    • 894 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Jack Johnson owns a 1998 Ford Mustang that he is looking to sell. He advertises in the Auto Trader. Mary Smith responds to his ad and expresses interest in purchasing the vehicle. Jack is asking $3500 for the car. Mary is looking to pay no more than $2500 for the vehicle. Would you describe this negotiation as a distributive or an integrative negotiation? Why? Jack has set $3500 as the price of his car but is willing to take $3000 for the vehicle. Anything under $3000 will not be accepted. Mary wants to pay $2500 for the car, but is willing to go up to $3000. Anything over $3000 will cause the deal to fail. Define and contrast the Walkaway Points, Target Points and Asking Price/Initial Offer of the parties. What are some of the strategies that could be used by each party to achieve the outcome they desire?…

    • 894 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would suggest the best negotiating style to apply to this will be collaborative style. Participation in joint problem solving is key for me. Secondly discovering and solving the real interest of both parties is another advantage of this style when applied to the case in question. Collaborative bargaining is a generic term that describes a variety of bargaining methods: win-win bargaining, collegial bargaining, consensus bargaining, cooperative bargaining, integrative bargaining, collective gaining and interest-based negotiations.They all involve a two-way discussion with the goal of mutual gains between the parties…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2007). Negotiation: readings exercises, and cases…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    turn up

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. The De Janasz chapter on negotiations describes two distinct approaches to bargaining: a “distributive bargaining strategy” and an “integrative bargaining strategy.” Describe at least one key difference between these two strategies. Then, describe an actual or hypothetical situation where adapting a distributive bargaining strategy would make the most sense (and why), as well as one where adopting an integrative bargaining strategy would make the most sense (and why).…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Research Report

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.…

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    * compromise – one or both parties may have to accept less than they wished for…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sluggers Come Home

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, in most situations, there may be overconfidence involved and they have unrealistic expectations. Teddy thinks the baseball playground is valued as 500,000 dollars, which is the behavior of the overconfidence. He does not know Brabara’s intention and the reason why Brabara intends to buy the baseball playground. If the assumption which the baseball playground is sold at 500,000 dollars is deal, there is a large dividend for Teddy, which is called Distributive strategy. In this, the goals of one party are usually in fundamental and direct conflict with the goals of the other party. Resources are fixed and limited and both parties want to maximize their share of the resources. As a result, each party will use a set of strategies to maximize his or her share of the outcomes to be obtained. Therefore, this is a large advantage…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negotiation and Team Owner

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Integrative negotiations- describe a win-win situation that parties try to find a solution to make the deal bigger.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The parties come to a mutual agreement that can be a win-win, also considered integrative…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Protecting yourself sometimes becomes a difficult task when you are on the opposite side from the “power”. You get become “panicky” or too accommodating, forgetting that you have something the other party wants, assets. A good way to overcome these issues is to stipulate a bottom line – what you consider the worst acceptable outcome. This is a good tool to resist pressure, especially if you have someone on your side to help reinforce that limit. On the counter side, this “help” can be costly (when it involves brokers, agents…) and, too rigid, limiting our imagination and creativity to invent other solutions that could better respond to both parties’ intentions. To overcome this “incapacitation” and to make the most of the whole negotiation process, you should know your BATNA – Best Alternative To a Negotiation Agreement. By know your BATNA (a measurement tool) that not only gives you better standards but is also more flexible then bottom line solution, it allows you to use imagination and invent other solutions that better satisfy our interests, but it may also be to uncertain, not giving you an actual limit.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Negotiation

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the realm of argumentation and debate many debaters negotiate their point of views in front of people all the time. Debates are basically distributive bargaining situations where debaters utilize selective presentation to try and win their arguments. This paper will define what a distributive bargaining situation is and secondly, this written discourse will define the technique of selective presentation. Furthermore, this paper will also discuss the definition of power, and the role power plays in negotiation. To elaborate on distributive bargaining situations and the use of selective presentation, I will use two arguments from a debate between James Carville, Jr., a liberal political commentator and professor at Tulane University, and S.E. Cupp, a republican political commentator, writer, and Ivey League socialite. The arguments originally specified by the republican commentator S.E. Cupp, stated “President Obama did not received the same microscope treatment that President Bush received from the media, congress, and the Senate;” and “raising taxes will not create more jobs, cutting taxes will create more jobs because businesses are job creators.” These two arguments will be used to show how selective presentation is applied in intellectual distributive bargaining situations.…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negotiations always occur between parties who believe that some benefit may come of purposeful discussion. The parties to a negotiation usually share an intention to reach an agreement. This is the touchstone to which any thinking of negotiations must refer. While there may be some reason to view negotiations as attempts by each party to get the better of the other, this particular type of adversarial negotiation is really just one of the options available. Among the beginning principles of a negotiation must be an acknowledgment that the parties to a negotiation have both individual and group interests that are partially shared and partially in conflict, though the parameters and proportions of these agreements and disagreements will never be thoroughly known; this acknowledgment identifies both the reason and the essential subject matter for reflection on a wide range of issues relevant to a negotiation. (Gregory Tropea, November 1996)…

    • 3629 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negotiation is an discussion between two or more different people, groups or parties intended to reach an agreement where both sides are satisfied with.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics