Preview

International Law Case Brief - RE Immigration Act and Hanna.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
International Law Case Brief - RE Immigration Act and Hanna.
Re Immigration Act and Hanna

Canada, Supreme Court of British Columbia, 1957

21 Western Weekly Rep. 400

Facts: George Christian Hanna (23 years old) is a stateless person trying to find a country for refuge. In 1954 the United Nations addressed the problem of "stateless" persons to solve the problem when one seeks refuge within a country; however, Canada is not a signatory. Spending most of his life as a ship-bound passenger, Hanna does not have a homeland. Hanna applied for refuge from The "Gudveig" a Norwegian motor-ship in which he was treated as a "stowaway" and imprisoned for more than 16 months. During these 16 months aboard the ship, Hanna made at least three trips to Canada. Hanna found himself in Canada looking for immigration status after being released by the act of habeus corpus. Immigration was not given and an order of deportation was handed down. The order was appealed on the basis that the order is defective, incomplete, and impossible to interpretation or enforcement and beyond the authority of the immigration officer.

Issue: Is the deportation order made by the immigration officer (acting as a special inquiry officer) legal and made within the means of his power?

Decision: The deportation order would force Hanna to be imprisoned aboard The "Gudveig" for an indeterminate amount of time. The circumstances that this deportation order created are not acceptable and the order was found to be illegal and Hanna was to be released from detention.

Reasoning: The deportation order included four directives. Directive No. 2 thru No. 4 was discredited by the court and No. 1 was the only directive considered and it went as follows: that Hanna be deported to the place whence he came to Canada. The court found that this meant many different things and that it was not possible to find where Hanna came from before he stepped into Canada. The fact remains that Hanna is a "stateless person" and there is no mutual agreement on where he is actually from. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    B. (2010). Immigration and Nationality Law Cases and Materials (4th ed.). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plaintiff a minor alien who survived a tragedy at sea, was rescued and placed in the custody of his great uncle, a temporary legal custodian. His great uncle filed several asylum applications on his behalf against the wishes of the minor's father in Cuba. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) rejected the applications as void. The plaintiff appealed to the district court, which was dismissed because the father was the only one that could apply for his asylum case. The plaintiff appealed stating that the INS had violated §1158 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996. The issue here was whether a non parental relative could apply or submit an application for asylum on behalf of the plaintiff against parental wishes.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief Memorandum

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Elian Gonzalez, an alien minor child, age six years of age, was brought to America from Cuba by his mother, Elizabeth Gonzalez, on November 22, 1999. During the trip from Cuba, the mother died at sea and the young boy was rescued and taken to a hospital in Miami, Florida. The boy was subsequently released to the custody of his great Uncle, Lazaro Gonzalez. While in Cuba, Elian Gonzalez lived part time with both his parents, who divorced three years earlier. Elian spent a great deal of time with his father, Juan Gonzalez, who remained living in Cuba. Elian was taken to the United States by Elizabeth Gonzalez without the consent or permission from Juan Gonzalez. A short time after Elian was released to the care of his uncle, Lazaro Gonzalez; a petition for asylum was filled out by the uncle and submitted to the INS (Immigration & Naturalization Service). The applications claimed that Plaintiff had a well-founded fear of persecution because many members…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Question: Assess the effectiveness of legal responses to asylum seekers in Australia in terms of achieving fair outcomes for both Australian citizens and the asylum seekers.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between Shades of Gray

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    her younger brother Jonas, and her head strong mother are separated from their father and deported to…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Whether the INS thoroughly considered asylum applications submitted by a third party on behalf of a six- year-old child, even though the child’s sole surviving parent expressed wishes against it.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Memo

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Whether Jane, a minor, would be able to file a petition for asylum on her own behalf?…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With conflict around the world rising exponentially, more and more people are fleeing torture and persecution, sacrificing their identity, in the hope of living a new and safe life in Australia. The Migration Act 1958 requires people who are not citizens and are unlawfully in Australia to be detained. This legislation ensures that asylum seekers arriving in Australia can be detained for unspecific and prolonged periods of time. No one wants to be a refugee: they just want to live a normal life like everyone else but they are powerless to change the situation in their country, to change their circumstances.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Immigration is not a human right, it is not a solution for a problem either, and immigrants who are denied admission into another country cannot claim it is violating their human rights because there are other options rather than emigrating. The article “Justice in Immigration” written by David Miller explains that nations have the ability to decide if they want to help immigrants and if they choose not to, it is not a violation of human rights. The article argues that refugees, people who are trying to get into another country since their human rights are under attacked, should be allowed to migrate, but to become a citizen or to even receive help is completely up to the other states. The next argument is the case…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immigration Law of 1965

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Three Decades of Mass Immigration. (1995, September). Retrieved September 19, 2010, from Center For Immigration Studies: http://www.cis.org/articles/1995/back395.html…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Offshore processing of asylum seekers, People who flee from countries which are persecuting them, escaping for their lives. Australia’s mandatory detention policy means that asylum seekers are locked in a detention centre until they are processed, which can take years. According to the Minister for Immigration, Amanda Vanstone, this is in order to deter other arrivals. Detention-centre advocates tell us that our tough attitude towards “boat people” is a deterrent for others who may consider seeking asylum here…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Central American families encounter overwhelming obstacles to due process in detention; for example, the process of expedited removal places families who are eligible for asylum at risk of deportation. Although refugees in removal proceedings have the right to legal aid, nearly 40% of all detention facilities are located 60 miles or from a metro area (Human Rights First, 2011). Because its difficult to access legal services, roughly 84% of women and children face their removal proceedings without representation (Srikantiah, Hausman, & Weissman-Ward, 2015). Although the immigration judge and opposing counsel are obligated to educate detainees on the asylum process, this seldom occurs.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Deportation

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thousands of people are deported annually from the United States. The intended purpose of deportation is to protect America’s economy and keep America safe from terrorists and criminals. However, deportation tears families apart and undermines the well-being of migrant children. Over the years, deportation has become an increasing threat to migrant workers and their children.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deportation Notes

    • 3780 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Lecture Notes Concerned with people who have a right to stay and have that right taken away and being deported. Law in this area has radically been reformed- goes back to 2006 controversy (foreign national prisoners- media issue about foreign nationals being convicted of serious crimes have not been considered for deportation). This led to changes- Labour tightened rules in 2006/2007. As part of 9July 2012 reforms, there has been a change of statements concerning art8 relating to deportation. Dealing with 3 systems: -British law -Art8 ECHR- rights to family and private life. More and more the main port of call for those wishing to resist deportation. -EU free movement law- primarily applied to EEA nationals and their family members. Higher level of protection than Art8. (Turkish nationals and fam members are able to benefit from at least part of EU regime). Different to removal- when people don’t have status and are being expelled. Deportation is about withdrawing the right to be in the country. Up to SS to deport or not- independent of any obligations. Automatic deportation came out of 2006 controversy (semi-automatic to be precise). 12 months is the main requirement. The idea is that if someone doesn’t have nationality and have been convicted of 12+ months then they must leave. s32(5) not discretionary. But there are exceptions in s33 UK Borders Act 2007. Looks like discretion has been taken out but it is inevitable that it will be a balancing exercise. In practice, discretion still has to be exercised by administrative decision makers.…

    • 3780 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Human Rights Advisory group has When all is said in done Remark 20 set out the commitments of states under Article 7 not to open people to 'the risk of torment or barbarous, cruel or corrupting treatment or discipline upon coming back to another nation by a method for their removal, ejection.' On account of Ng v. Canada (over), the state was found to have abused the Agreement by removing a man to a nation where he would confront a coldblooded and barbaric type of…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays