Preview

International Politics By Hans Morgenthau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
851 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
International Politics By Hans Morgenthau
The Realist tradition is based on the idea that international politics is a never ceasing struggle as mentioned above. Hans Morgenthau advocates that the “power” is the most important priority to aim for. Moreover, every nations has their own national interest which can be interpreted as the survival and the existence. Nation states seek opportunity to maximize their political power and its dominance. Likewise, according to the fundamental notion of geopolitics, states are the living-organisms, so that every organisms have humanly needs, which means that they are born, they grow and and die. Thus, it is inevitably immediate yet most natural aim for every state to expand keep their status quo on the international level. Apart from the national …show more content…
However, he argues that nation state is a security maximizer than a power maximizer. Thus the central concern for state is the survival. Thus, nation states need a particular amount of power to secure the national security, not to suppress others. He argues that the root cause of inter state disputes, the trouble to achieve multi cooperation are all resulted in the lack of structure and creates the anarchy. Fellow neorealists indicate that not all nation states are legitimate to be perceived as a unit, rather great powers must determine the international political order and system. Overall, neorealist scholars present two major proposals, first, nation states cannot exercise and maintain its power and security individually, second, they are required to get involved to create equilibrium in international political …show more content…
The whole system is more important than the individual state. Even though a state’s primary goal is to secure and maintain security and its national interest, but state must act and play around under international norms and regulations, which means it limits their certain interests. In reality, states tend to accumulate power such as military , economically etc in order to secure their survival, while power gives a capacity to play as equivalent on the international level. As Waltz argues that, states must rely only on themselves to avoid and protect themselves from any potential risks or threats that posed by their opponents. Yet state’s stability creates insecurity for others. Thus, it is inevitable that, states, as a defensive actors, they react to external forces and create conflicts with each other according to how the system is established or how the table is arranged. Furthermore, in terms of anarchy, he explains how the war is always possible by illustrating how external forces or situations push states in one direction or another. Nonetheless the billiard balls are same, states differ from each others in terms of its size and power. Neorealist scholars note that international politics is the structural system, thus only limited superpowers are worth to form and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    world order essay

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nation states play a significant role in the promotion and enforcement of World Order. The nation states, through compliance with international law and multilateralism retain a significant impact in the enforcement and maintenance of the idealistic notion of World Order, defined as the sole existence of global peace and stability and an absence of conflict. However, state sovereignty and a lack of political will can ultimately impede on the effective enforcement of World Order. Nonetheless, as highlighted by the international humanitarian intervention in March 2011, nation states play a pivotal role in achieving world order.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To begin with, security is heart of every foreign policy of any state but the question of what constitutes being secure, security breach or generally in what context security shall be viewed opens doors to a lot of interpretations. Realists view the concept of security from a traditional perspective, which meant military, war to mention a few (Lawson, 2003: 80). This is the underlying idea behind the security that the realists seem to be addressing. As they believe in an anarchic international system where the state is the actor which is power hungry, self-serving and only concerned with its survival, their view of security has everything to do with the respective state in the international community. In other words the state fights for its protection and survival in the international sphere through war or military prowess. But the application of this theory in a quiet and peaceful world becomes problematic. A good example is now that there is peace, how does one explain peace. Even though the realists explain the peace time as being an artificially construed and temporary thing, and war being natural way the international sphere, their argument does not hold much water especially when met with liberalist views on International relations. One must stress out that the realist theory was a very much accepted and may even still be accepted because…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each of the six actor types is significant in a specific way and serves a particular function to international relations. States are the foundation to the system to the system and without them there would be no international relations. The elements that make up a state are three specific things: Sovereignty, a defined territorial area, and a government that makes and enforces laws. A state’s sovereignty is its ability to make decisions both internally and externally. This means decisions are made by the state and not an external force, and a state’s sovereignty must be accepted by other states. For example, “Sovereignty is the basis of the state’s power supremacy within the country itself, exclusive control over the territory and power independence from other states” (Soros, 2007). A more physical example of a state would be the country France; it meets all three conditions to be considered a state and more. France has a border, an established government, and its sovereignty is well respected in the international community. What makes this different from nation-states is the nationalism of a country. A nation-state…

    • 1934 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on realist perspective, geography proves to be a very essential tool in understanding, analyzing, and explaining phenomena in international politics. It is considered one of the factors that shape the behaviour of states when it comes to dealing with different global issues, most especially if these will affect their respective interests. Securing their interests, being the primary concern of each state, leads to actions that have a global impact. Historically, there were states that projected imperialist tendencies as a manifestation of their interests. This phenomenon may be related to the concept of balance of power, which can be considered as one of the most, if not the only, vital requirement in attaining stability in international politics. The said concept vis-a-vis the states seeking their respective interests can be a point of reference in comparing Sir Halford Mackinder 's land power and Alfred Thayer Mahan 's sea power.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While it may appear that a government made a certain decision to help a struggling country, or start a war in the name of spreading democracy or bringing an end to terrorism, their true goals lie in much more selfish matters. For instance, a country might send an army into Africa to put a stop to an uprising of rebel soldiers, but on the back side they begin exporting valuable resources to their homeland. Realists believe that power, not peace, is the main focal point of political interest, a hypothesis which can easily be tested by observing the actions taken by previous governments throughout history. By focusing on the study of political power, realists create a continuity of analysis of policy: each state can be analyzed in terms of power politics. Notwithstanding, Morgenthau warns against two common misconceptions: the first would be trying to understand the motives of governing individuals and groups. This is a mistake because motives don 't always align to actual policy or the outcomes of said policies; and the second misconception is the alignment of ideology with action. Put simply, Morgenthau believed that a policy may be made to seem that it has the intentions of the people, or a cause the people believe in, at heart when the reality is that the policy is truly a means to gain additional power. Although it may sound rather obvious. Morgenthau warns that policy has been repeatedly guided by legal and moral guidelines instead of strictly political considerations. As a result, the power of a country and the welfare of its citizens have been routinely endangered. Instead, realism advocates that policy must arise out of purely political analysis. With that being said politics become a bit more translucent. If one were to follow the history of…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The theory of Hegemonic stability reinforces that for the international system to remain stable, it “requires a single dominant state to articulate and enforce the rules on interaction among the most important members of the system” (Ferraro on Hegemony). “The system is a collective good which means that it is plagued by a ‘free rider’ syndrome. Thus, the hegemon must induce or coerce other states to support the system” (Ferraro on Hegemony). To a realist, the international system must be anarchical with no central authority, promoting greater diversity, opposed to a plethora of empires (Ferraro on Realism). This means the hegemon will not rule other nations, but induce a system that will be beneficial for all. To be a hegemon a state needs to…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The structural-systemic approach offers a very broad, “bird’s eye” approach of analysis of the causes of war. Waltz argued that the individual image reduces the causes of war to an unreasonable measure, and that anarchy explains the causes of war in the international system. The anarchical state of affairs causes states to be unsure of intentions.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a famous representative of realism theory, Waltz asked himself the question why do wars occur? “Waltz’s question is as old as war itself, possibly because “to explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of war” (Waltz, 1959: 2). By the time Waltz posed this question, many answers to it already existed. These answers fell into three categories (or as IR theorists came to define them, were found at the three “levels of analysis” or in the “three images”). These three categories/levels/images are: the individual, the state, and the state system” (C. Weber, 2009, p. 17). These main causes of conflict will be represented in detail in the main body of the paper by the example of Berlin Crisis.…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The objective of the World State is to reach a status of stability and happiness of the society according to the World State’s motto “Community, Identity, Stability”. To achieve this goal old social structures, like religion,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the international realm, states will inevitably seek a balance of power. When a number of weaker states are threatened by a coalition of stronger states, they join forces, establish a formal alliance, and seek to persevere their own independence by checking the power of the opposing side. Balance of power seeks to ensure the equilibrium of power in which case no one state is in a position to dominate all the others. The aims of the Balance of Power Theory is to preserve the independence and survival of individual nation-states, preserve the state system, and prevent any one state from dominating the system. The means to achieve this is through vigilance, alliance, reciprocal communication, intervention, and…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1648 the Peace of Westphalia effectively ended the rule of the Roman Catholic Church replacing it with a system of legal entities with a permanent population, a well-defined territory and governments capable of exercising sovereignty. The modern sovereign state with a supreme authority to manage internal and external affairs was born. For most of its existence the discipline of International Relations was normally presumed to treat the relations between states, the latter viewed as cohesive social actors driven by their desire for power and prestige. International organizations and other non-state actors were allowed an influence of their own in certain areas, but the state remained in ultimate control. Now IR scholars argue that there has been a transition in the system of sovereignty from the free reign power of the states over their political and economic rule, to a more liberal system that seeks to limit the states authority. There is a perception that IGO's and NGO's are replacing states as the dominant actors in the international system.` Idealists often present non-state actors as the vanguard of an emerging global civil society, challenging the instinctive authoritarianism of states and the power of international capital. Hard-line realists see them either as front organizations thinly disguising the interests of particular states, or as potential revolutionaries, seeking to undermine national solidarity and stability of the state system ` (Josselin and Wallace, 2001). None of the theories can now deny that the balance of power between states and non-state actors has shifted. The purpose of this essay is to examine whether this shift has declined the authority of the states or left them as the most important actors in world politics? By comparing the state to other actors in IR the essay hopes to answer this question.…

    • 2584 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nato and Neoliberalism

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To analyse NATO within the neoliberal perspective, the aspects of NATO as a key player in creating cooperation and strengthening the interdependence in the international system should be noted. As a priority, contents of the neoliberal theory will be identified and consequently the picture of NATO from this point of view will be provided. According to the neoliberal theory of international relations, individuals and states have the capacity to solve problems through collective action. This cooperative action among states creates mutual advantage and not only states but also other institutions play a central role in creating this advantage in international events. Most importantly, as a consequence of these mutual benefits, liberal democratic states avoid waging war on each other, which this avoidance is caused not just by international pressure but by domestic pressures also. Therefore military force becomes a non-primary instrument for the states in forming their foreign policies. In this sense international institutions and organizations may maintain an independent identity and can encourage cooperative behaviours while monitoring the states. The independence of these international institutions should be guaranteed with rational calculations which will utilize cooperation without a hegemon. Under all these ideas one can think of NATO as a military pact which considers use of power and domination in the first hand. But there are several unique characteristics of NATO that make this institution open to a neoliberal interpretation:…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The traditional writers have in common a state centric approach to international relations. Though some were concerned that governments should reflect more inevitably good intentions of their citizens in international affairs or that world organization should have more power to deal with warlike or renegade states, their focus of attention is the international…

    • 4141 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays