Preview

Interview Questionnaire

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Interview Questionnaire
DETAILED REPORT ON PRIVATISATION AND DISINVESTMENT

BY:
RADHIKA, RASHMI, REENA RIDDHIMA & SHWETHA,

INTRODUCTION TO PRIVATISATION

The word privatisation has been receiving much attention in business, government and academic circles on a global platform.
This phenomenon of privatisation can be linked to a revolution or boon. Privatisation techniques have already been tried in countries like Great Britain, China, United States, Turkey, Brazil, Mexico, & Japan. In our country to a beginning towards privatisation has been made with the sale of upto 20% of the equity capital of 30 plus select public sector units (psu’s), first to mutual funds and financial institutions and later to the investing public.
HISTORY
THE history of privatisation is very short-just 10-15 years old to be precise. The real disinvestment started only in 1980’s, the word privatisation first made its appearance in late 80’s. The credit for inventing the word goes to Peter.F.Drucker, which used the term first in his famous book, the age of discontinuity in 1969. Ten years later, Margaret Thatcher became prime minister of Great Britain and it was she who gave practical shape to privatisation. Later country after country fell in line with the Great Britain in move toward privatisation.

RATIONALE OF PRIVATISATION
According to supporters of privatisation, the rationale for privatisation and disinvestment is as follows: * PERFORMANCE. State-run industries tend to be bureaucratic. a political government may only be motivated to improve a function when its poor performance becomes politically sensitive, and such an improvement can be reversed easily by another regime. * INCREASED EFFICIENCY. Private companies and firms have a greater incentive to produce more goods and services for the sake of reaching a customer base and hence increasing profits. a public organization would not be as productive due to the lack of financing allocated by the entire government's budget that must

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Saskatchewan, people's attitude towards privatization varies. Today, a growing number of people believe that SaskTel as a Crown corporation should be privatize. There are many critics of SaskTel who call for the privatization of it, if not all Crown corporations. Many argue that SaskTel could operate more efficiently as a private company than as a Crown corporation. Such critics argue that free market is a more efficient mechanism for the allocation of goods and services and that privatization will give the public greater choice at a competitive price. They argue that Crown corporations dominate the Canadian economy and are inefficient, prone to political interference, and distort market forces. They believe that Saskatchewan people deserve to choose which company they would like to do business with and at what price. The public also wants to see the benefits of competition. Most of them think that the government is more worried about protecting one of its cash cows than anything. Supporters of privatization say that it leads to reduced government debt, increased efficiency, and stimulates an entrepreneurial culture. In addition to critics of crown corporations, there are other arguments for the privatization of SaskTel such as the following: First, it is often argued that governments have few incentives to ensure the enterprises they own like SaskTel are well run. Whereas private owners will lose money if their businesses are run poorly, thus public money can sustain even the most inefficient enterprise. Moreover, because federal government owns Crown corporations, public officials may only be interested in improving a Crown corporation when its performance becomes politically sensitive. The government may put off making any improvements to a given corporation due to political sensitivities. Second, corporate executives and personnel may be selected for…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When government contract with private companies to perform what was once considered to be the traditional work of government, it is termed as privatisation. Privatisation is occurring at a rather impressive speed in United States. For example, there are over 100 privatised prisons in the country (Kissane, 2007). Other forms of privatisation occurring in United States include privatisation of schools, military plane maintenance, state welfare and employment agencies and hospitals. Privatisation has become a very controversial topic in the country due to its wide range of advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The impact that the prospects of deprivatization have on investment by managers of privatized firms is that these managers will come to a realization that additional investments are prone to more risks in respect to the potential payback. In this situation, the time frame for returns on investments is shortened immensely. The uncertainty stems from the longer time frame, which results in managers hesitating from entering as a private firm. If this notion of deprivatization is upholded upon organizations, the owners will potentially lose any gains they may possess.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the collapse of Soviet Union, it was practicing a command economy wherein state planners assigned the production of particular manufactures to particular places. All factories, farms and energy providers were state controlled. After the collapse, the new leadership decided to privatize all the state controlled businesses, but due to corruption among state representatives the process of privatization soon became rife with corruption, giving well placed opportunists unjustified advantage, thus denying the new government badly needed revenues. Hence, very little progress was made towards diversification of the economy.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some could argue that it is a marketing mechanism; however, this can lead to the reduction in power and the diminishing of sectors in the government. It is not even just government sectors that are being bought out, it is even prisons, sewer systems, and parts of the military. In my opinion, this can lead to even more corruption in the government and federal systems. This is because the government no longer has complete control over these parts and the new owners have most of the say. In private prisons, there is a quota of people that need to be in the prison which leads to several infractions given to the prisoners leading them to stay longer than their original sentence. This is just prisons, imagine what is going on in the actual government…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Public companies have been the locomotives of capitalism since they were invented in the mid-19th century. They have installed themselves at the heart of the world’s largest economy, the United States.”[Economist, p.1] “Public companies have shown an extraordinary resilience. They have survived the Depression, the fashion for nationalization, and the buy-out revolution of the 1980’s.”[Economist, p.8] Even though they do face some mighty large challenges ahead, they will hold strong in the near future but may eventually continue a downward trend as other types of corporations advance and become more popular; more profitable. The Economist notes that: “Public companies are in danger of becoming like a fading London club. Their membership is falling. They spend their time fussing over club rules. And, as they peer out of the window, they see the bright young things heading elsewhere.” [p.8] While noting three key problem areas, principal-agent problem, regulation, and short-termism, as the cause for the decline in the “IPO crisis” it goes in depth on how this has also coincided with a boom in other corporate life forms.…

    • 3044 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The objective of this paper is to provide a concrete overview, and demonstrate how privatization of public services agencies is taking place in the area of health and human services. I will also look at the rationales behind privatization and the evidences of how effective or problematic this could be for many government agencies. We must agree that privatization is not a new concept and this has been around for a many decades. What is privatization? What are the pros and cons? These questions have been discussed among many import people in society without reaching most of the times an agreeable conclusion. As we all know privatization can be define or refer to the act of transferring ownership of specified property or business operations…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Reserve Bank of Australia (1997:7) defines privatisation as the full or partial transfer of ownership of public assets to the private sector (Reserve Bank of Australia 1997). Privatisation gradually increased across the world in the 1980’s originating in Chile, the UK and New Zealand which was a ‘radical reversal’ of the ideology of state ownership (Heraclerous 1999). According to King (2003:2) privatisation began in Australia during the 1980’s with the deregulation of the financial sector and airlines and was accelerated in the 1990’s (King 2002). The first major company to be privatised in Australia was the Commonwealth Bank in 1991 through an IPO (Docherty 2014). Since then the government has privatised multiples state owned companies like Qantas and Telstra (Zhuanf et al. 2014).…

    • 1864 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    rivatisation is politically unpopular; according to polling undertaken by Essential Media, most Australians (58%) are opposed to privatisation with only 22% thinking the policy is a good idea. 1 In an earlier poll, Essential Media had found that only 6% of respondents thought the public had benefitted from past privatisations. 2 o n the other hand, we know that privatised firms ‘almost always become more efficient, more profitable, and financially healthier, and increase their capital investment spending.’…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Life

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Why might efficiency increase when a company is privatized, that is, converted from government ownership to private ownership? Could efficiency decrease? When a company is privatized efficiency can increase. When the government owns the factors of production there is little opportunity or incentive to design better products or pursue new technology. Efficiency is simply getting the most from what you’ve got. … There is no guarantee that efficiency will always increase.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privatisation: The Kennett government used privatization as means for reforming Victorian public sector on an unprecedented scale. The purpose of the privatisation program was to bring responsible economic management in government enterprises, utilities and operation with greater efficiency, accountability and competition. Two leading tools of privatization policy have been the sale of State’s Government Business Enterprises (GBEs) and assets, and the contracting out of public services. To provide the legislative framework for the corporatisation and restructuring of the State’s GBEs, while still retaining accountability to the government, the State Owned Enterprises Act 1992 (assented to on 26 November 1992) was enacted (Contract-p.27). The government raised more than $22 billion from assets sold in 1993-94 which has turned out to be the nation’s largest privatisation program (revolution-p.137). Assets sold include closure of school sites; the TAB, the Heatane Division of the Gas and Fuel Corporation; the Grain Elevators Board; Bass Ticketing and many other entities. Among them, the most significant reform program took place in the Victorian electricity supply industry (ESI) at two phases. At the first stage in…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privatization is very popular in government and is making its way into more entities within the United States. It is a topic of research for scholars and it is a concern for some government employees. Privatization has two sides, a good side and a bad side. It puts fear in some people because they don’t want privatization to take over in certain places. People don’t want to lose their jobs when for profit companies take over. Others don’t feel they will get the best services because new employees will come into the picture that are not as efficient or knowledgeable. Other concerns are that individuals feel government or government assets should not be for sell or be controlled by a company.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Liberalism

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While one pillar of KWS and reform liberal principles also support the free market system, like classical liberal and neoliberal principles, the privatization of former Crown corporations under Canadian neoliberal globalization does not follow the KWS and reform liberal principle of government regulations (McBride & Shields 128). That is, KWS and reform liberal principles permit a free market system under government regulations to ensure companies produce safe products for consumers, safe workplaces for workers, and reduce environmental damage (Mintz, Croci & Close…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Capitalism

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    State owned enterprises (SOES) are becoming wealthier and more powerful than before, due to judicious pruning and relentless restructuring. This has result in greater return of assets and increase in competitiveness on a global scale. However, there is hardly any direct relationship between the state enterprise and the government, where SOES report to the authorities. Instead, most governments prefer to exercise control through their ownership of shares, resulting as powerful shareholders in the developing world. Governments also offer patronage to private companies after it becomes a winner due to their lack of experience of a sector.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays