Preview

Invasion Of Drones Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Invasion Of Drones Essay
I would oppose the use of drones in warfare. Drones are a creative thing and have a feature comparing to other kind of air force weapons to fight. The United States used them from long time ago. According to “ Invasion of the Drones” by Hugh Westrup, “ A curious-looking slammed next to an elementary school” ( Source A). Drones at the same time were a horrible thing because they are the reason of someone’s death, even kids that are innocent and attending the school. Drones could crush buildings at any time without the control even it’s an elementary school because it has a software program and actually no one could manage it when glitches are happening. Proved that, people are managing the drones and speeding them by its software system which it’s …show more content…
According to “ The Pros and Cons of American Military use of Drones”, “ Drone attacks in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia have killed upward of 3,500 militants, including dozens of high-level commanders implicated in organizing plots against the United States” ( Source J). US drones attacked several countries around the world, and they were the case of killing people and commanders , the countries establish plots against the United States. As the author Jeremy Scahill stated in the article “ The pros and Cons of American Military Use of Drones”, “ the vast majority of militants operating in Yemen today are people who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight”. People across the country had a suddenly emotion about the country that is falling down, therefore, they’re having motivation against US drones, they also had protests hoping the drones to become illegal. Residents are terrifying to get out of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the September 11 attacks, the Pentagon and the C.I.A have launched hundreds of strikes in Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen and Libya. These have resulted in thousands of civilian casualties. People who see their loved ones injured or killed in drone strikes become motivated to join terrorist groups. According to author Jeremy Scahill, the vast majority of militants operating in Yemen today are people who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight (Procon.org n pag).…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones can cause people to become terrorist. The people becoming terrorist most likely have had a loved one either die or be injured from a drone attack. As Amnesty International said, ”drone strikes can be classified as “war crimes” or illegal “extrajudicial executions.’” (Source K 9) Drones may also not hit the right target either, but drones are not meant to hit each and every target spot on. The people controlling the drones are not perfect and are allowed…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They effectively state “The drone strikes are counterproductive because they gave rise to a desire, particularly among young men, to seek revenge for the drone strikes, thus radicalizing a new generation”. This statement shows how these drone attacks by the U.S. bring about a worse kind effect than any other, a rise in hatred towards the U.S. in the future leaders of Pakistan. Even if the hate from future generations establishes itself, the U.S. is doing what it believes is the best way to protect its people now and has stated plans to help Pakistan in the future in hope of reconciling the damages they are causing now. As Zeese and Flowers continue to describe the destruction that drones cause, eventually drones will be used more and more, causing their effectiveness to increase and eventually cause less destruction. Though the people of Pakistan would rather have less damage now, the damage caused by drones is very little in comparison to ground troops. In recent reports, many causalities and confrontations were caused by the U.S. troops and the many firefights with terrorists that pop out during their patrols. The drones on the other hand, cause less confrontation and can lead into less overall deaths in both civilians and troops…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality in Drone Warfare

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Though the topic of morality and drone warfare is a sensitive and difficult one, Strawser seems to do his best to think rationally, logically, and fairly about the issue, and to present his beliefs as clearly as possible. After reading the entire article it is noticeable that Strawser focuses on three main points: drones can be morally preferable if the attack is morally justified, the drones are precise in their attacks, and if they do less harm to their operator.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological effects of war happens all the time around us in different shapes and forms, whether we are aware of them of happening or not. Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card and the article “Theorizing the Drones” by Chamayou uses the psychological effect of government officials tracking and monitoring the people. Ender’s Game and the article “The Mystery of ISIS” by anonymous uses the psychological effect of terror and sense of belonging. All three readings create a sense of the overlapping theme of psychological effects of war.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays