The victim sued American Press for intrusion, publication of private facts and infliction of emotional distress. The victim sued the American Press for intrusion. Intrusion on a seclusion claim is a special incident of invasion of privacy. It is implied when someone intentionally intrudes physically or seclusion of another. However, for an intrusion claim to be made a plaintiff has to establish four elements. First, the…
The Tarasoff Case is based on the 1969 murder of a University of California Berkley student, Tatiana Tarasoff. The perpetrator, Prosenjit Poddar was a student at the University who had met Tarasoff at a folk dancing class on campus. While they went on several dates, they soon disagreed on the seriousness of their relationship and Poddar became obsessed with her. When Tatiana rebuffed him, Poddar began stalking her and underwent an emotional crisis for which he began psychological counseling at the university medical center. (Vitelli 1)…
There often comes a time in all of our lives when we must each realize that our actions can severely hinder the lives of others. Whether our actions are intentional or unintentional has no relevance, as it is imperative that we sustain the common bond that tie us together as people and dispels any subversive efforts that aim at creating racial barriers. Having been adequately briefed about the event that occurred on campus, I have decided to elucidate how this type of unbecoming behavior completely goes against our moral code and our obligation to treat each other with respect and dignity. First, it is my belief that this type of behavior only contributes to further legitimizing the concept of race and thus, begins to forge social stereotypes that not only marginalize individuals but also makes them susceptible to other discriminatory practices.…
The public disclosure of private facts about a person is not an invasion of privacy if it is done without the person's knowledge or consent.…
As a result of recent lawsuits against many organizations, companies have developed a policy on proper email practices on company computers. No longer is your personal email regarded as private when accessed on a company's computer. Companies, in order to decrease lawsuits and increase productivity, have purchased email monitoring software to track email usage during work hours. Therefore, with the onslaught of email monitoring, is a private email really private?…
Chapter 3 is titled "Basic Underlying Concepts: Privacy, Probable Cause, and Reasonableness." Privacy refers to an American citizen's expectation of privacy. Probable cause is usually needed by law enforcement officers before they can arrest an individual as well as search with or without a warrant. Reasonableness refers to the standard of searches and seizures to be valid under the Fourth Amendment. Katz v. United States (1967) is the case that demonstrated a change in the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.…
Ted Koppel an anchor and managing editor of the ABC News (1980-2005) wrote an article called Take My Privacy, Please! This article is about the many services that people sign up for that appear to make their lives easier, save them money, or ensure their safety, but may collect varies data on their habits and lives. The main goal of this article is to inform people of the many services we sign up for without knowing or understanding the full capacity of their service (Koppel, 2012).…
The Fourth Amendment should not be taken lightly, when invading the privacy of people. For example, people do not need a warrant to retrieve a person’s document that they have already shared with someone. Consequently, personal information could be stolen, but these people are unaware that their individual material is being searched through, and is being kept in storage. Likewise, Daniel Zwerdling states that, since Facebook uses specific software that has the ability to recognize people in pictures, this invades people’s privacy. Because of this software, anyone can observe a picture of someone and automatically know who they are. In fact, according to David Sirota, the government does not trust people enough that they have to seize a person’s…
When it comes to protecting and saving lives of the American people, private invasion used in order to locate and capture potential terrorist should be unlimited. The 911 attack has provided active proof to the American peoples of the damage that terrorist groups can impose on our society. Therefore, invading the privacy of individuals may prevent future terrorist attacks.…
As America shifts into a technological age, practically every aspect of our daily lives is influenced by technology. This influence has extended to the way crimes are committed, as evidenced clearly by a murderer known as “The Craigslist Killer”. A medical student at Boston University named Philip Markoff is alleged to have committed the crimes attributed to this killer.…
The fourth amendment states that unreasonable searches or seizures are prohibited unless they have a warrant. the fourth amendment grew directly out o the colonists experience of unreasonable searches of there privacy and personal property. Even the king did not have the authority to search his peoples homes although government agents were allowed to search homes if the reason was lawful and they had a warrant. My family thinks this amendment is very important because of whats happening right now with the internet and individual surveillance. its more important than ever. The controversy is that the NSA and commercial (i.e. google) surveillance are eroding our privacy. I think the whole thing with the NSA seeing our emails is really creepy.…
The Fourth Amendment protects us citizens from the searching of our homes and private property without properly executed search warrants. If law enforcement wants to collect these records such as GPS tracking or cell phone tracking, they will need a search warrant based on probable cause. This constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment because it violates the individuals reasonable expectation of privacy. You would think that your location would be private and expect it to remain private, but that is not the case. When law enforcement seeks the cell phone location and this individual is inside his or her house, they cross the line by learning facts about the interior of the home, which is clearly illegal without a warrant. Let's say the…
To begin with, the article gives us an example of how our privacy can be invaded by intruders or the government in other words. She uses the story of Barbara Katende who discovered that a traffic camera supposable monitoring the streets was watching her while she was in her apartment with the window blinds open semi naked or naked I believe she later told her story to the New York Times. The problem I see with this example is that she is generalizing the form of living of these person and let me tell you that not all the people live in the middle of the city in between buildings and if that was the case those people know better that they wont have the privacy that a suburb for example will offer to them. Yes I do understand that some people do not like to be watch, but I believe in the phrase “if you have nothing to hide, why worry about it”. I do understand though that Barbara did not know that she was been watch; however, if I’m going to be naked around my apartment I make sure that my entire window covers are close. That it is just me I guess.…
Has anyone ever look through your belonging without asking and thought it was moral? Having privacy is a huge problem in our society too many individuals and celebrity.Without Privacy, anyone could invade your life by stealing your identity and personal records. In the first amendment, The bill of rights says that everyone should have their right of privacy no matter what. Privacy is having freedom way from others. "Individuals who live in a civil country or state deserve their right to privacy under any condition even though they are a celebrity because…
It’s just another day of class, at least which is what is going through your head. You think schools are a safe place, not a place where you can get shot or killed at. What is going through your mind when you’re their sitting in class? Nothing other than what is going on. But it was all different for these students that day. On December 14, 1994, 26 year old Ralph Tortirici walked into a history class at State University of New York. Underneath his clothes he had a hunting knife and a Remmington 270 hunting rifle with which he took the classroom hostage. One of the hostages said he told everyone to stand up and get to the side of the classroom. Tortirici also told the professor to leave the classroom. He wanted everyone to know he was serious by firing off a round from his rifle and used a fire hose to tie the doors shut. Tortorici told the hostages in the classroom he had a computer chip in his brain and penis and wanted to see the president. If everyone cooperated nobody would get hurt, but 19 year old, Jason McEnaney, rushed the gunman and it discharged. McEnaney was seriously injured, shot in the leg and groin. Once arrested, Tortorici repeatedly said, “I did what I had to do.”…