Preview

Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1732 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns
Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns

Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns, just the very sound of that statement causes many people to assume that the taboo is something that could never happen under the circumstance. Some people do not take euthanasia seriously and make jokes like, “Euthanasia! Is that a bunch of young children in Asia!” and still, maybe the worst of all, there are many other people that at the mention of euthanasia have no idea whatsoever what it is or its effects on people. The fact of the matter is that the involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns is happening and not only in the United States but all over the world need to be aware of this problem and not in the dark about this very important yet controversial subject. Although not very many studies have been done on this issue, it is ever growing and a much larger problem than anyone really realize. Just to give a small example of the seriousness of this situation, The Economist in on April 2009 article reported that a London University study reported that one in every three hundred deaths are involuntary euthanizations.
The controversy behind euthanasia defective newborns is very complex and combated as well as supported by many different arguments. While there are many arguments for and against the subject, there are definitely same that stand out above the rest. First, many believe that if any decisions are to be made about any newborns, defective or not, should be made by the child’s parents or guardian. Next, several doctors as well as others who have read the Hippocratic Oath believe no doctor that has taken the oath can euthanize due to the contradiction it causes. Finally if you look at the problem from an ethical stand point it can go one of two ways which complete my points. On one hand you can say that euthanizing the newborns is wrong because you are taking the lives of the newborns. On the other hand doctors see their actions as more of an act of mercy



Bibliography: Britton, John R. " 'Baby Doe ' Rulings Review and Comment." Western Journal of Medicine Feb. 1984: 1-5. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Web. . Quezon, Manuel L. "Medicine: The Right to Kill." Time 18 Nov. 1935: 1. Web. . Fost, Norman. "Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns." 1-11.The Journal of the American Medical Association.Web. Jan. 1986. . Charlemagne: The Great Euthanasia Debate | The Economist." The Economist - World News, Politics, Economics, Business & Finance. Web. 01 May 2011. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Campbell discusses some of the issues associated with palliative care of newborns. His main points was concerning the slippery slope argument of euthanasia and how it relates to the situation and its unjustness. He states that these arguments are merely saying to the baby "as far as your interests are concerned it would be morally best if we induced a quick and painless death. But if we do, it will launch the rest of us down a slippery slope. So put up with your distress, and save us all from the slippery slopes" (Campbell, pg. 283). His argument is that while creating a quick and painless death for the infant may be cause a serious debate on euthanasia, we should keep the best interest of the child first and foremost. I do agree with Campbell…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Euthanasia in Neonates: Should It Be Available?” Kate Costeloe explains that euthanasia for newborn babies is illegal around the world, however, it is practiced in critical situations. Costeloe’s main point is that the people of the United Kingdom believe that there is moral and an ethical disconnect between active killing for babies and euthanasia for adults. Costeloe uses the United Kingdom as an example to show how euthanasia is perceived as a form of therapy contrary to the popular opinion of it being suicide. Although it is viewed as a therapeutic endeavor, active killing for neonates is met with hostility in the United Kingdom.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion, I don’t think it’s morally right to take active steps to end the life of a severely impaired newborn. There’s a different new view that’s becoming more popular which is that it’s morally acceptable to end the life of a severely impaired newborn if the infant would be better off dead. That completely broke my heart. I believe if the infant is alive, we should do everything to keep the infant alive. If the infant was born so severely impaired, the chances of it staying alive are extremely low. But, as doctors and as the parents of the infant, I believe we should do everything to help the infant stay alive. It is not morally right to give up on in infant’s life just because it was born impaired no matter how bad it is. As a Christian, I believe in miracles and I believe in the power of prayer. If God, brought that baby to earth, it is only He that can take it away. The infant deserves a chance to live and deserves the support and love from everyone around them. If it’s God’s will the baby will survive, if not then God will take it back but it is not up to us to end their…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why would someone ever think that PAS is morally acceptable in todays medical practice? Euthanasia is one of the key terms that need to be defined when talking about PAS. 1Euthanasia is the act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reasons of mercy. A philosopher by the name of James Rachels is in favor of Euthanasia. 2He defends Euthanasia by stating that “Killing someone isn’t morally worst than letting someone die.” He believe that in letting someone die that is an action and because death is no worst than living in certain circumstances which in some way gives justification to cause someones death. 3In the debate of legalizing PAS there is one principles on which all of organized medicine agrees on that the principle of patient bodily integrity requires that physicians must respect patients’ competent decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Which is something all physicians understand and familiarize themselves with before really going into the medical field, this does cause a road block in saving lives, if those lives in fact don’t want to be saved. People whom are for PAS may look at the pros in this medical procedure like The right to die should be a fundamental freedom of each person. Nowhere in the constitution does it state or imply that the government has the right to…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nursing Care Plan

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Davis, F.A. (2004). Nurse’s Pocket Guide: Diagnoses, Interventions, and Rationales. (9th ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company. Glass, S. M. (1999). Assessment and Care of the Well Newborn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debate Resolution: If voluntary euthanasia is legalized in the U.S., it will have primarily positive and acceptable social consequences. Consequently, it should be legal…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of mercifully ending a person 's life in order to free someone from a deadly disease. The Greek word “Euthanasia” simply means “good death”. This refers to the intentional ending of a person or animal’s life to relieve suffering and pain. It is also known as “Mercy Killing”. It is a serious ethical and political issue in today’s society because it goes against the norms of traditional medicine. It is so, because some people define euthanasia as a form of suicide. However, some people actually think that it is a choice that concerns the quality of life. In fact, people have different standards regarding the worth of life. Others believe that being clinically alive is enough to say that a person should live, but for others, it is simply inadequate. If a person’s life is lacking in self awareness or intrinsic presence as a human being, due to extreme physical or mental suffering, then that person should be able to choose a dignified death rather than an undignified existence. This is evident because of moral conscience, social bias or pressure, and financial situations. It is portrayed that nurture or environmental factors plays a role that make euthanasia more appealing. In short, some people tend to disregard the moral and ethical values of life when they see a person suffering. Indeed, despite of the moral and ethical issues that contradict the concept of euthanasia, there are certain factors it impacts society positively, which leads it to be more socially acceptable.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Neonatal Ethics

    • 2781 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Brazier, M.. "How to Treat Premature Infants." The Scientist Dec. 2006: 22+.Questia. Web. 7 May 2013. <http://www.questia.com/read/1P3-1183055161/how-to-treat-premature-infants>.…

    • 2781 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Death with Dignity

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages

    There is a lot of controversy with the subject of euthanasia. I, for one, was not even aware of the depth of the subject until I started researching for this paper. It has been most…

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasi-Keep It Illegal

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, the legalization of euthanasia has proved to lead to involuntary killing. In 1990, physicians in the Netherlands were involved in 11,800 deaths or 9% of all deaths in the country. Of these, half were labeled "active involuntary euthanasia", that is, the patients were killed without their consent. Furthermore, by the late 80 's it had become routine to euthanize babies born with handicaps, like Down syndrome and spina bifida. Also, three nurses in Amsterdam killed several comatose patients without any consent. They were convicted, not of homicide, but of failing to consult a physician.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An ongoing argument in the world of medicine concerns euthanasia and the right to die. There is an important distinction to make that will be useful later on in describing the difference between active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide, because they are not the same thing. Euthanasia, more specifically voluntary or active euthanasia, pertains to an intervention, such as lethal injection, requested by a mentally competent patient so as to precipitate death. Physician assisted suicide on the other hand is when a doctor prescribes a lethal dose of medicine that the terminally ill patient requests and ingests at their time of choice that will end their life (Scherer and Simon 13). Many arguments have been made as to why this should be legally permissible. Some say that it helps end one’s suffering. Others say that the act is abiding by doctor’s oath to help patients. Robert Young claims that it does not go against moral codes by stating, “It is sometimes morally permissible unintentionally to occasion harm despite the harm being foreseen, provided there is a sufficiently grave reason” (Young 84). On the contrary, legalizing active euthanasia is morally wrong, many physical complications almost always occur, and it goes against the Hippocratic Oath. For those reasons, we believe active euthanasia should not be legalized. This issue is pertinent in many people’s lives and if Euthanasia is legalized, it could lead to the de-valuation of human life.…

    • 3029 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision for euthanasia is a pure moral decision; one that brings with it both positive and negative consequences. The main leading argument is that it allows those who will severely suffer to alleviate their pain before they ultimately pass. This assisted death puts less of a strain on medical supplies and allows the patient to die rather than remain in pain. Contrary, some argue that we do not have the humane…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The controversy of euthanasia has been comparable to an equally controversial topic: abortion. Both topics deal with medically assisted death - one with babies, and the other of terminally ill individuals. In both cases, people are accusing doctors of being “murderers”, which implies that the doctors issuing the life-ending drug are monsters (Source G). Furthermore, critics of euthanasia argue that some patients do not have the mental capability to make a decision, such as those suffering through dementia or other mental illnesses (Source F). However, all people should have the right to make their own choice about their life, and should be able to receive proper medical support with their decision. Euthanasia has shown to have many medical benefits, which clearly far outweigh the downsides. In Oregon, for example, the passing of the ODDA, an assisted suicide bill, has shown to have actually increased and bettered end of life care (Source C). In the end, euthanasia has unequivocal benefits, mainly medical and moral, that are far more important and significant than the minor…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Termination of viable fetus for non life-threatening conditions or abortion has become the subject of many debates even up to these days. It is a universal belief that life is sacred and nobody should be deprived of life, even the little ones. The fetus is a human form and from the moment of conception, it achieves humanity. Therefore, it is entitled to live. When one patient decided to undergo abortion, I do not know what exactly I should feel. Considering that she is not having ectopic pregnancy, I cannot fathom why she chooses to abort the baby even if her pregnancy does not threaten her at all. This ethical issue challenges my belief and principles in life. However, I have come to realize that when I am faced with situations…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays