Preview

Is Breaking the Law for a Cause Justifiable

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
788 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Breaking the Law for a Cause Justifiable
Krista Cannilla
Professor Gonzalez
ENG 151 (9061)
April 9, 2013

Defining the Elasticity of the Law

In what situation would breaking the law become plausible? What circumstances will justify a person’s actions when they decide breaking the law becomes a necessary matter? The variables are essential. What type of crime was committed? Does it affect anybody else negatively? Whenever the law is broken, the potential perpetrator is brought to court. The justice system and its judges then decide if he or she is guilty. Depending on their decision will result in either punishment or absolution. In minor cases it’s possible to be looked over and favor the defense, but if a severe case is brought to court, it gets much more complicated.
Who’s to say the law itself is justifiable? Movements and reforms have taken place in order to create a fair and just law enforcement system. There have been movements such as the civil rights movement, women’s suffrage, and gay rights, all forms of protest against the law. Those individuals were able to use their right to freedom of speech to express an inequality and inadequacy in the law. Due to ongoing democracy in the United States, modifications have been made to coincide with our natural rights.
Is the situation a matter of life or death? The niches on this topic can extend variously.
If someone had complete intentions of murder, and the evidence is valid, murder in defense to the offender may not have punishment. Again, the courts would determine all aspects of the situation. The defendant might slip up and admit to a fault or reasons as to why someone was trying to kill him or her in the first place, although nothing justifies the intent. In the predicament of and actually saying, "In defense for my life," would not entirely justify the action. Independent choices and the rights of an individual are another factor that ties into death. Assisted suicide is punishable by law. When it comes down to self-affliction,



Cited: Zerbisias, Antonia. "When Breaking the Law Is Justified." Common Dreams. The Toronto Star, 10 June 2011. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. Cohen, Carl. "Bad Arguments Defending Racial Preference." Academic Questions 21.3 (2008): 288-295. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Apr. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the readings that I have done I have found that there are three different types of legal defenses, they are: self-defense, insanity, and provocation. In a case where a person is charged with first degree premeditated murder, if they were to use one of the three defenses the punishment would not be the maximum that is normally imposed depending on the crime and type of defense that is used.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. On Liberty (1859). pg. 309. University of Toronto Press. 20072. Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. On Liberty (1859). pg. 314. University of Toronto Press. 20073.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. Retrieved June 16th, 20084.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 34. Retrieved June 16th, 20085.United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime. http://www.unodc.org/enl/showDocument.do?lng=fr&language=FRE&cmd=add&country=THA&node=docs&documentUid=699&pageNum=2 . Narcotics Control Act. Retrived June 16th, 20086.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 28. Retrieved June 16th, 20087.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 327. University of Toronto Press. 20078.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 327. University of Toronto Press. 20079.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. Constitution Act. pg. 1057. University of Toronto Press. 200710.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 332. University of Toronto Press. 200711.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 333-334. University of Toronto Press. 200712.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 333. University of Toronto Press. 200713.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 77. Retrieved June 16th, 200814.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 334. University of Toronto Press. 200715.Dyzenhaus, David. Law and Morality: Readings in Legal Philosophy. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571. pg. 334. University of Toronto Press. 200716.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 79. Retrieved June 16th, 200817.Judgements of the Supreme Court of Canada. http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/. R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74. pg 11. Retrieved June 16th, 2008…

    • 2441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “A Red Light for Scofflaws”, Frank Trippett shows true and well rounded statements. He states that ordinary law-abiding citizens are able to progressively break more and more laws thinking it is okay to do so. People break laws every minute and everyday without them realizing they have done it. However once they achieve to breaking the laws they will likely choose to continue and influence. It is known that breaking the law is becoming more powerful than ever.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anyone can say that a law is unfair and unjust. However, who is really willing to accept the consequences for going against this law? Is breaking this law really worth the punishment? The government is the one to decide whether a law is reasonable, but what if a member of the public believes that a law is not? Should he rebel against this law? Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. answered yes to this question and believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They both believed that government had many flaws. They shared many beliefs in the same subjects concerning Civil Disobedience but had many different views on how the government should work and how the citizen should be treated by society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self defense is arguably the most justifiable reason for taking a life. If someone should ever feel as though they are in immediate danger, violent retaliation is one of the most…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defensive Homicide

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Under defensive homicide in the crimes act (2005), A person who, by his or her conduct, kills another person in circumstances that, but for section 9AC, would constitute murder, is guilty of an indictable offence (defensive homicide) and liable to level 3 imprisonment (20 years maximum) if he or she did not have reasonable grounds for the belief referred to in that section.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physician Assisted Sucide

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My support on this claim it is assisted suicide a right way or wrong way By Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez “Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that all persons have a moral right to choose freely what they will do with their lives as long as they inflict no harm on others. This right of free choice includes the right to end one 's life when we choose. For most…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it ever be justifiable to break the law? Basically the question is would you break the law if it was for a good reason. For that I would say yes. Even though, laws are meant to maintain order in a citsatie. There’s certain sichwashions were it would be best for what is happing.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Murder is one of the crimes that can be applied for the death penalty.A Lot of people probably think that if someone were to murder someone they deserve the death penalty.However I believe they deserve to suffer in prison and live in a cell and think for every hour of the day about what they did.In my opinion if they get the death penalty that is the easy way out.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "I do not think lawbreakers should go unpunished. By controlling the act of jaywalking you are endangering the life of yourself and others. If the action of jaywalking only affected yourself the punishment might not be so severe. By causing potential harm to the life of others you should be penalized for this action. By not taking action against jaywalkers you are suggesting that jaywalking is too little of a crime to take action against, and that breaking the law is not important enough to be punished.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every country around the world as well as every community within its given country has laws, but what exactly are laws? According to the Oxford Dictionary a law is, “the system of rules which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties,” (Oxford, 2013). Keeping the definition in mind it is undoubtedly obvious that laws are created with a purpose behind them. That purpose being, to better society as a whole, by adhering to given laws. The question is should civilians be allowed to break these laws? The answer is yes, however there must be a greater positive outcome in doing so.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States is homeland for millions of immigrants who risk their lives for a better existence. In Jefferson’s words, it is a nation in which “All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights that among them are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Our nation is a country in which equal opportunity if provided for those in search of a better life and our law is meant to apply evenly to citizens and non-citizens alike. However, throughout history and even in our present day, Congress has undermined this utopian goal by passing laws which some may consider unjust.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The definition I will take is a combination of these two. I define an unjust law as one that degrades human personality through the unfair suffering of a minority group at the hands of a majority group. Keep in mind that a majority can be in either power or number. A majority in number can be oppressed by a majority in power. Any law that causes a person to suffer simply because they do not agree with this majority is an incorrect and unjust law.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "According to this view, law-violating behavior should be viewed as an event that occurs when an offender decides to risk violating the law after considering his or her own personal situation (need for money, personal values, learning experiences) and situational factors (how well a target is protected, how affluent the neighborhood is, how efficient the local police happen to be). Before choosing to commit a crime, the reasoning criminal evaluates the risk of apprehension, the seriousness of the expected punishment, the value of the criminal enterprise, and his or her immediate need for criminal gain." (Siegel, 1992, p.131).…

    • 807 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays