If Irene files a tort action against her sister Darla for alleging slander, Irene will be successful in her case. But first, what does it mean to allege slander mean? The plaintiff must show that a wrongful statement has been made that causes a person to suffer economically or monetary. Although Darla overheard Irene’s comment on the phone for trying to accept products without paying she does not have physical evidence to prove that she said this. Now for Darla, she told several of her friends about the situation using what she heard herself without no physical evidence. For Irene, she is now being ultimately “accused” of taking products without payment thus showing that Darla can be filed for alleging slander.…
I would now like to look at the opposing side, those that feel police corruption is not present in Steven Avery’s case, or in the United States as a whole. The first article, from ABC News, is entitled Making a Murderer': Is Steven Avery Guilty? A Deeper Look Into Netflix Series. In this article, Ken Kratz, the prosecutor of the case, is interviewed. He discusses that the Netflix documentary leaves out several key pieces of evidence, which prove Steven and Brendan are guilty. The article makes a point in stating that Ken is now a defense attorney. Ken states that the filmmakers left out two key pieces of evidence: the car’s hood latch and the phone calls. DNA from sweat was found on the hood latch of Teresa’s car, and upon testing matched Steven Avery.…
The Murder of Cherica Adams, and the involvement of former NFL star Rae Carruth raised several issues. The case the prosecutor made was that former NFL star Rae Carruth conspired with three accomplices to trap and shoot Cherica Adams because she was pregnant with Carruth’s child. (Andrusko) (Fryer).…
The Amanda Knox case is one of those cases that shows how far our technology and the way the investigation process has changed over the years. Amanda Knox was born on July 9th, 1987 in Seattle washington. Amanda Knox grew up in a middle-class home. Where she attended Seattle prep high school. After graduating she went to the University of Washington where she went on to study abroad in Italy. When she arrived she met her roommate Meredith kercher. Soon after they met they kicked it both sharing the love for classical music. While being there they met Raffaele solecito, after a while the two began dating.…
Myra Hindley, a serial killer in England, murdered several children with the help of her boyfriend Ian Brady. Along with Ian Brady, she committed the rapes and murders of five small children. At the age of nineteen she met Ian Brady, a stock clerk who was recently released from prison. She fell in love with him and soon became under his control. She became the willing accomplish to Brady’s horrific crimes of rape and murder. Hindley's 17-year-old brother-in-law tipped her off the police about her crimes. During their 1966 trial, both Hindley and Ian Brady pleaded not guilty to the murders of four victims, Edward Evans, Lesley Ann Downey, and John Kilbride. Hindley plead not guilty to all five of the murders. She was only found guilty of three…
Have you ever thought about what you would do if you had to fight for your life against an attack from a person you considered your wife or boyfriend? That is probably an answer only the person that has had to fight for their life can answer or is it just an excuse to kill. This is what the trial of Jodi Arias is about in Phoenix, Arizona; the slaughtering of Travis Alexander, Jodi’s lover whom she stabbed to death 27 times, slit his throat from ear to ear, and finally shooting him in the face because she said, “she was…
He cleverly frames the situation as revenge for Quilty’s kidnapping and corrupting Lolita. Thus, the murder becomes understandable — it was an act of a father protecting and revenging his beloved stepdaughter. He confesses to his gross, pedophiliac relationship with Lolita for multiple reasons. It is wise for him to include his monstrous actions. If he claims otherwise — perhaps that his relationship with Lolita was blissful and completely consensual— Lolita would testify against him. But more important, Humbert and Lolita’s relationship serves to distract the reader and “jury” from the only true charge Humbert faces — murder. Despite Humbert’s claim that recounting his story is “to save not [his] head, of course, but [his] soul,” his ultimate goal is to avoid a death sentence (308). By spending a substantial part of the novel describing his relationship with Lolita, he hopes to convince the jury and reader that his most perverse crime was pedophilia rather than murder. Humbert even voices this opinion at the end of the novel: “Had I come before myself, I would have given Humbert at least thirty-five years for rape, and dismissed the rest of the charges” (308). Murder could mean a death sentence for Humbert, which is why he focuses on his relationship with Lolita - pedophilia entails a lesser…
When it was Joanis' turn before the bench, the judge took a softer tone: "I think you lost your way. I think you were weak. I think you had a false sense of loyalty."…
Cheryy, Kendra. About.Com (n.d.) What Is Forensic Psychology?. [online] Available at: http://psychology.about.com/od./branchesofpsycholog1/f/forensicpsychology.htm [Accessed: 15 Feb 2013].…
Sometimes kids can be too innocent, but not with this little girl named Scout Finch.…
Although most Americans agree on what is considered to be a crime, not everyone agrees with punishments. What are common views on crimes? What are common views on punishments? Should the punishment match the crime? Should the punishment be more severe than the crime? What happens to the victim of crimes? American’s ask all these questions on a daily basis all across the United States. The majority of society in the United States says that crimes are “a grave offense especially against mortality”(“Crime”). Many say that criminals’ punishments should be equal to or more severe than the crime that was committed. Patty Hearst not only was a victim of a kidnapping in 1974, but was also brought before the court…
In her article “Innocence is Irrelevant,” Emily Yoffe, a contributing editor at The Atlantic, argues that plea bargains control the justice system. According to Yoffe, plea bargains make it easy for prosecutors to convict defendants who may not be guilty but at the same time, pleas bargains offer leniency. Yoffe supports her position by providing examples of previous cases.…
This Organisation is a non-profit Legal organisation dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustices. The Innocence Project was established in a landmark study by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Senate in conjunction with the Benjamin N.Cardozo School of Law, which found that incorrect identification by eyewitnesses was a factor in over 70% of wrongful convictions. The Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University .It then became an independent non-profit organization in 2003, but has strong institutional connections with Cardozo. As I have said, The project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people through DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. As a clinic, law students handle case work while supervised by a team of attorneys and clinic staff. There are many organisations across the world. The Innocence Project is a member of the Innocence Network, which brings together a number of innocence organizations from across the United States of America. It includes members from other English-speaking countries like the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and our own Country - Ireland. The Irish Innocence Project (Tionscadal Neamhchiontachta na hÉireann) was officially launched at Griffith College Dublin by Doctor Greg Hampikian, director of the Idaho Innocence Project and DNA expert for the Georgia Innocence Project. This is the first…
The insanity defense is a topic that seems to garner a lot of attention even though it is rarely used and only a few cases that invoke are actually successful. A combination of highly publicized cases that use it and the public’s misunderstanding of exactly what happens when someone is found “not guilty by reason of insanity”. It is because of cases like John Hinckley and Andrea Yates where the defendants are found not guilty by reason of insanity coupled with the public’s misunderstanding that causes the public to become so outraged with the insanity defense. The public has this common misconception that someone found not guilty by reason of insanity is just let go and is not punished for his or…
It is imperative to understand the theories and perspectives in order to explore the morality or immorality of pornography. Theories that touch on ethics include utilitarianism, deontology as well as ethical egoism just to mention but a few. Ethical theories attempt to explain the rationale behind people’s actions especially when distinguishing what is right or wrong. Analyzed from the perspective of ethics, Pornography, considered the one of the oldest professions, prostitution and other acts of pornography, is an art form that ancient civilizations drew on walls, therefore, considered moral. Specifically,…