Television has evolved tremendously through time. It has become a go-to source for most Americans. In the passage, “The Worst Years of Our Lives”, by Barbara Ehrenreich, she considers modern people as “couch potatoes” and that television has turned us into “root vegetables.” Ehrenreich does make a point about American people becoming lazy; however, comparing us to fictional characters on TV is questionable.…
Television has become an extremely powerful influence over society and families since it’s introduction. Although this powerful influence that television has shown may not all be great. In the essay “Television: The Plug-In Drug,” a stance is taken by Marie Winn dictating that because of television, there is an ever growing problem with degenerating social skills individuals influenced by television (438-46). Even though Winn fails to consider that not every single individual influenced by television will be lead to degenerated social skills she does effectively displays her argument showing real-life anecdotes and studies to show the short-term and long-term effects of watching television. Even though Winn fails to consider that not every…
There is no doubt that television holds a purpose in our society today, but is that purpose brain-numbing or actually beneficial to our brain development? The television, also known as: TV, the boob tube, the idiot box, as well as many other nicknames, has been around for almost a hundred years. Ever since cable TV became popular in the 1950’s, there has always been a worry that people watch too much TV. Most people believe that with exorbitant exposure to the popular media both dumbs us down as well as makes us more likely to tolerate acts of violence. Dana Stevens’ “Thinking Outside the Idiot Box” argues that television does not make you smarter, directly contrasting Steven Johnsons article, “Watching TV Makes You Smarter.” Television has definitely made a mark on our hearts and has most certainly made an impact on society, but too much of a good thing is never a good thing. The propaganda photo about television that was found on Facebook is a good lens that helps me understand Stevens’ argument better. The photo assisted the understanding of Stevens’ depiction and contradiction of Johnsons writing, her discussion about what these “more complex shows” are actually like, as well as her discussion about the national event TV Turn Off Week. This photo clearly depicts that TV does not enhance or benefit in brain production in any way, however it “destroys” the imagination, or what’s left of it, and in return, it fills the mind with complete nonsense, and therefore numbing the brain. The photo, which is a picture of a television, states, “My job is to help destroy what’s left of your imagination by feeding you endless doses of sugar-coated mindless garbage.” As humans, we are very complex intellectual beings, however television has been captivating our minds and bringing our intelligence down.…
Just like the teacher from earlier, being one who was affected by the over-indulgence of T.V., she is not the only one. Winn concludes, that the effects of the television has harmed family relationships by eliminating opportunities for conversation, and other interactions. Whether it be conversing over daily activities, or arguing about internal issues, these opportunities have diminished because of television being the distraction. Winn used a mother as a reference because the mother’s solution to her kids fighting was to turn on the T.V., and ignore the issue. Another thing that was noted when it comes to children and television, is the loss of real life experiences. Children who watch too much television become so attached to the T.V. personality, and lose the ability to respond to real people because of the lack of interest. Winn’s use of logos in parts of her argument are used effectively to put actual reason behind how television is causing a lack of…
Television is the predominant media-metaphor of this generation. Television shapes the way people think, act, and communicate; however, this powerful apparatus does not always disclose the whole truth. In fact, television often hides the whole truth from the public, but, ironically, most people love the media and blindly believe what the media says. As Alford Huxley says, people will “adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.” Unfortunately, Huxley’s hypothesis is slowly becoming a reality. In Neil Postman’s “Amusing Ourselves To Death,” Postman argues that the many facets of television people love will actually ruin them. Of these many facets of television, three are predominant. Television is ruining people’s lifestyles…
When watching a program, people are focused on the plot, make inferences, and create relationships with characters. Therefore, develops a cognitive exercise for the audience. Johnson informs his readers that there is an interaction between people and a television screen. Some examples he describes are when TV shows allow the viewer to develop a mental outline of a show, when a characters encounter social issues, and giving someone a cultural experience through a TV screen. He includes visuals that show different threads of TV programs, displaying the complexity of their scenes overtime, and how much it challenges the brain. Those graphs associate with Johnson’s term the “Sleeper Curve” (279), which according to him is the most debased form of mass diversion. He says that even if it is just reality television, violent content on TV or video games, and children shows, it still helps people become perceptive. Johnson concludes that instead of people having a negative attitude or having fears of their children being influenced by content of TV or video games, he insists that they both should share the experience. Parents and children will continue to interact with the TV screen mentally and therefore develop skills no matter what they watch. This essay presents in argument that television is good for…
The novel entitled, The Count of Monte Cristo was written by Alexander Dumas. The story begins during the eighteenth century and takes place in the country of France. The environment is within the travelling adventures of men embarking on a ship called the Pharoan. The protagonist is introduced by the author as being, Edmond Dantes. This character is seemingly described as being an extremely trustworthy and very naive young man. He is a youthful sailor from Marseilles and is more or less favorably destined to become the next captain of the ship. While sailing abroad the ship named the Pharaon, the presiding Captain LeClure dies of what was then known as brain fever. Dantes assumes the acting position of commander and leads the ship back to Marseilles. The ship-owner, Monsieur Morrel, is overwhelmingly charmed to find that such a young man had the keen ability and skill to have mastered such a task. Monsieur Morrel makes plans to bestow Edmond Dantes as the official captain of the Pharaon. However, unbeknownst to Dantes this has gained himself four scheming and conniving cut throat enemies. These four characters within the story were noted as Danglers, Ferdinand Cadarouse and at his own account Villefort. Henceforth, each of the four men collectively betrayed Edmond Dantes for their own selfish reasons. However, Gerard de Villefort the prosecutor ultimately betrayed Edmond Dantes the most.…
In 1964, the literary critic Northrop Frye published a book, titled The Educated Imagination, in which summarized his ideas on the relevance of literature to life and more specifically, the conventions that come with them. Frye establishes the literary forms through the exploration of traditional and modern forms of story telling. The foundation of conventional literature has been told many times throughout history, however it is at the discretion of the author to embellish it with minor outlying details, or content change. Literature can only stem from literature itself. All literature is new, but also recognizable. We can still find these conventions in modern day literature and media. An illustration of the Cinderella story convention is…
Price uses negative diction and details to demonstrate how too much television and not enough reading can destroy a child’s imagination. In his article, Price says, “You’re likely to get a story that amounts to an airless synopsis of a made-for-TV movie…” which explains his point to how, over the years of his teaching, his students have been slowly but surely declining towards an unimaginative fate.…
Before the invention of television and film the art of story telling was restricted to theater and literature. Theater was and still is performed live by actors who tell some kind of story through their performance. But theater is still limited greatly in its ability to convey setting to the viewer. In order to fully grasp the power of any story one must believe, in a sense, that the events are happening before them. Literature is better able to accomplish this by utilizing the power of the human imagination. Even more than this literature has the ability to describe human emotion through the use of strong metaphors and colorful language. It is this technique of writing that remains unique to literature. Even film…
Throughout this essay, Postman talks about how much television has been taken as a mix of entertainment and information. He especially talks about how television affects children, such as when their parents place them in from of a TV thinking a show will give them an education on what they’ll need to learn. The author gives Sesame Street, as an example of a show that parents think will benefit their children by watching. Little do they know that it is anything but benefiting. Placing your child in front of a TV is just teaching the child to watch more television. Neil Postman puts up an argument exclaiming that “we now know that Sesame Street undermines what the traditional idea of schooling represents” (422) He goes on to say that “Sesame Street appeared to be an imaginative aid in solving the growing problem of teaching Americans how to read, while, at the same time, encourages children to love school only if school is like Sesame Street” (422)…
Cited: Bachtel, Rose. “Television: Destroying Childhood.” The Composition of Everyday Life. Ed. John Mauk and John Mentz. Boston: Wadsworth, 2012. 619-621. Print.…
Many parents are guilty of blaming the television for making their kid obsessed with the wrong things, or for distracting them from school. On the other hand, National Public Radio suggests that television actually makes children better readers. They argue that literacy not only means being able to read, write, listen, and speak, but also to understand the different dimensions of these features. These dimensions include digital media and complex skills building to create a more well-rounded individual. They state that to achieve this, television can be used as a medium for kids to experience the “new” literacy while their parents help them achieve the “old” literacy goal. National Public Radio also believes that adults need to get past the more traditional approach of "no screen time" and use more modern approaches for their children to understand since they live in the 21st century. This shows that the author believes that the parents are at fault at times for underdeveloped children literacy, which is the opposite of what other people believe. Television should still be used in moderation, but adults have to understand that keeping their child from this device only hinders their development of what is called a “21st century” literacy. “21st century” literacy refers to being able to interpret other things such as images and emotion, not just being able to read, write, listen, and…
Human nature is consistently displayed through the eyes of authors in literature. Whether it be the desperation of children whose lives are at the mercy of a beast of an island, or the perseverance of a young boy, crippled and disheartened; literature often conveys the determination, inner conflict and perseverance that makes us who were are as a race.…
Edmund Spencer once said: “It is the mind that maketh good or ill.” Imagination can lead to ultimate success, yet unfortunately, it can also lead to complete turmoil. We make sense of our world and move on in life by telling stories. We dream “a little something to get by on,” as Robert Stone once said. We dream a story for ourselves and mold our lives around the requirements of our dreams. We also use imagination as a coping mechanism to deal with our past and present. One can choose to ignore reality and use his imagination as a “time machine,” so to speak, in an effort to find the life that satisfies oneself (Robert Holdstock). We use story to “create our sense of ourselves,” which can indeed be very dangerous if we choose to ignore reality (Arthur Miller). There is immense danger in living one's life according to a personal story that is not anchored in some sort of reality. One can see how dangerous story telling can be by analyzing the character of Willy Loman, in Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman.…