In the first selection we had discussed, it was about what males should be like. The description was absolutely absurd; it suggested that males should be an expert warrior, brave/loyal, not cowardly, should be a scholar with knowledge of more than one language (suggested Greek/Latin/vernacular language), more than average in humanities, read/write poetry and the list goes on long after that. Castiglione’s view on women was different when compared to the male expectations. Women were supposed to be “soft” and “sweet”. He also suggests that women should be knowledgeable. (Document 3). Even though Castiglione suggests women should be knowledgeable, he then goes on to say that the knowledge is only for entertainment reasons; an example would be socialization between men and
In the first selection we had discussed, it was about what males should be like. The description was absolutely absurd; it suggested that males should be an expert warrior, brave/loyal, not cowardly, should be a scholar with knowledge of more than one language (suggested Greek/Latin/vernacular language), more than average in humanities, read/write poetry and the list goes on long after that. Castiglione’s view on women was different when compared to the male expectations. Women were supposed to be “soft” and “sweet”. He also suggests that women should be knowledgeable. (Document 3). Even though Castiglione suggests women should be knowledgeable, he then goes on to say that the knowledge is only for entertainment reasons; an example would be socialization between men and