Coach Bishop
DBQ#3
03/06/2015
Jacksonian Democrats
Jacksonian Democrats were not the "guardians of Democracy" that they claimed to be, but instead were merely guardians of their own sectional interests and Andrew Jackson's inflated ego. Jacksonians were skilled at emotionalizing issues and rallying the support of the South and
West.
The Jacksonian Democrats primary goals were not Constitutional justice and individual liberty, but instead they strived to suppress New England, the Whig party, and business interests and to preserve state's rights. Andrew Jackson (despite allegations to the contrary by South Carolina and Tennessee) was born in North Carolina and grew up a son of the frontier. The hero of the Battle of New …show more content…
(It should be noted, in fairness to Andrew Jackson, that Webster owed several thousand dollars to the B.U.S.). Still,
Jackson claimed to be protecting the rights of individuals, instead of the interests of Western speculators. Sometimes, however, it was Jackson's ego and not sectional favoritism that drove
Jacksonian democracy. When Chief Justice John Marshall (a Federalist) ruled that the Cherokee nation had a right to its territory, Jackson declared, "Justice Marshall has made his decision now let him enforce it." Jackson claimed that the "common man" wanted the Indians removed and promptly sent the Cherokee down the "Trail of Tears" to Oklahoma. The move was actually fueled by Jackson's dislike for Marshall and his feeling that the executive branch superseded the
Court. Jackson vetoed the Maysville Road project in Kentucky, claiming that the Constitution mandated internal improvements in intrastate areas be the responsibility of local government.
He declined to mention that the road ran through the home district of his archrival, Whig Speaker of the House Henry Clay (Document G). In truth, Jacksonian Democracy did not …show more content…
Jackson resented upstart South Carolina and John C. Calhoun, due to the Eaton affair. “Resolved, That the legislature of South Carolina, having every confidence in the justice and friendship of the nonslaveholding states…” (Document F) In these Acts and
Resolutions, the legislature of South Carolina asked nonslaveholding states to suppress abolitionist societies and make it illegal to print or distribute information about abolition. South
Carolina warned Congress that if it allowed abolitionist material to be sent through U.S. mail, the state would take measures to prevent that mail from entering or crossing South Carolina. You may recall that in his annual message to Congress in 1835, President Jackson attacked the abolitionists and their incendiary publications. Jackson was an advocate of slavery. The
Cherokees were brutally mistreated by Jackson's removal policy. Irish immigrants were often the victims of big city riots in the East, which Andrew Jackson did nothing to prevent. These injustices were usually concealed from visitors like Harriet Martineau and Alexis De
Tocqueville.
Jacksonian Democracy did little for individual liberty and constitutional justice,