Jackson's Indian Removal Essay
1) The reasons that the Cherokee give for rejecting the idea of moving beyond the Mississippi River is because they cannot endure to be deprived of their national and individual rights, and exposed to a process of intolerable oppression by the residents who live near the river already.
2) The Cherokees understood their “national and individual rights” as not having the rights, which the fathers planned, in their favor. The U.S. see them as an evil eye unlike many other Indian tribes. Many of the members of the tribes are changing the culture and they agree that the American soil is not the land of their birth and affections.
Jackson’s Indian Removal (1829)
1) The information that Jackson provided to support his position about the Indian policy …show more content…
The kinds of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of the federal courts are cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or federal law and cases between citizens of different states.
2) Marshall arrived to the conclusion that the Cherokees were not a “foreign state” under the meaning of this Constitution because “foreign states” is a general term used in the American Constitution. Also the Indians are not foreign to the United States and cannot comprehend the Indian tribes with the word. The significance of the “domestic dependent nation” status with regard to constitutional rights of the Cherokee Nation is that the tribes can occupy a territory to which they declare an independent will, “which must take effect in point of possession when their right of possession ceases”.
3) This apparent contradiction regarding Andrew Jackson and him opposing South Carolina’s assertion of state sovereignty during the nullification crisis of 1832-1833 is his revival Henry Clay. Due to Clay planning out his plan, Jackson asked Congress to enact legislation permitting him to use federal troops to enforce federal laws in the opposition of
2) The Cherokees understood their “national and individual rights” as not having the rights, which the fathers planned, in their favor. The U.S. see them as an evil eye unlike many other Indian tribes. Many of the members of the tribes are changing the culture and they agree that the American soil is not the land of their birth and affections.
Jackson’s Indian Removal (1829)
1) The information that Jackson provided to support his position about the Indian policy …show more content…
The kinds of cases that fall under the jurisdiction of the federal courts are cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or federal law and cases between citizens of different states.
2) Marshall arrived to the conclusion that the Cherokees were not a “foreign state” under the meaning of this Constitution because “foreign states” is a general term used in the American Constitution. Also the Indians are not foreign to the United States and cannot comprehend the Indian tribes with the word. The significance of the “domestic dependent nation” status with regard to constitutional rights of the Cherokee Nation is that the tribes can occupy a territory to which they declare an independent will, “which must take effect in point of possession when their right of possession ceases”.
3) This apparent contradiction regarding Andrew Jackson and him opposing South Carolina’s assertion of state sovereignty during the nullification crisis of 1832-1833 is his revival Henry Clay. Due to Clay planning out his plan, Jackson asked Congress to enact legislation permitting him to use federal troops to enforce federal laws in the opposition of