Jai Hind

The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0263-5577.htm

Six Sigma: concepts, tools, and applications
Mahesh S. Raisinghani
Texas Woman’s University, Denton, Texas, USA

Six Sigma: concepts, tools, and applications 491

Hugh Ette, Roger Pierce, Glory Cannon and Prathima Daripaly
Graduate School of Management, University of Dallas, Irving, Texas, USA
Abstract
Purpose – To provide a sound discussion on the Six Sigma methodology and see how it fits in with other quality initiatives. Design/methodology/approach – A conceptual paper that takes at in-depth look at the origins, pros and cons of Six Sigma and how it relates to some of the other quality initiatives in industry. Findings – The immediate goal of Six Sigma is defect reduction. Reduced defects lead to yield improvement; higher yields improve customer satisfaction. Six Sigma defect reduction is intended to lead to cost reduction. It has a process focus and aims to highlight process improvement opportunities through systematic measurement. Six Sigma implementation can have negative consequences if applied in the wrong project. Six Sigma is a toolset, not a management system and is best used in conjunction with other more comprehensive quality standards such as the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence or the European Quality Award. Research limitations/implications – This is a conceptual study and hence there are no hypotheses tested as in an empirical study. It does provide a good foundation for future research. Practical implications – A very useful source of information and impartial advice for practitioners and researchers planning to practice the Six Sigma methodology and/or understand its pros and cons. Originality/value – This paper fulfils an identified information/resources need for Six Sigma methodology. It is based on utilizing an

References: Bai, R-J. and Lee, G-G. (2003), “Organizational factors influencing the quality of the IS/IT strategic planning process”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 Nos 8/9, p. 622. Davig, W., Brown, S., Friel, T. and Tabibzadeh, K. (2003), “Quality management in small manufacturing”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 Nos 1/2, pp. 68-78. General Electric Annual Report (1997), “Letter to our share owners”, available at: www.ge.nl/ annual97/share/index.html (accessed 28 January 2004). Getty, R.L. and Prybutok, V.R. (2003), “The effects of streamlined operations on the perceived quality success criteria at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics – Fort Worth”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 Nos 1/2, pp. 85-97. Keen, P.G.W. (1997), The Process Edge: Creating Value where it Counts, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. McClusky, B. (2000), “The rise, fall and revival of Six Sigma quality: measuring business excellence”, The Journal of Business Performance Measurement, Vol. 4 No. 2, Second Quarter 2000. Mayor, T. (2003), “Six Sigma comes to IT: targeting perfection”, CIO Magazine, available at: www.cio.com/archive (accessed 24 January 2004). Montes, F.J.L., Moreno, A.R. and Molina, L.M. (2003), “An analysis of the relationship between quality and perceived innovation: the case of financial firms”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 Nos 8/9, p. 579. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2001), “Baldrige index stock study 2001”, iSix Sigma, available at: www.isixsigma.com/library/content/c010426a.asp (accessed 30 January 2004). Rath and Strong Management Consultants (n.d.), “Six Sigma”, available at: www.rathstrong. com/rs/pbuild/linkbuilder.cfm?selection ¼ dn9.9.12 (accessed 25 January, 2004). Sager, R. and Ling, E. (n.d.), “Leveraging Six Sigma to improve hospital bed availability”, available at: www.isixsigma.com/library/content/c030708a.asp (accessed 11 January 2004). Schneiderman, A.W. (1999), “Q. when is Six Sigma not Six Sigma? A: when it’s the Six Sigma metric!”, available at: www.schneiderman.com (accessed 15 January 2004). Schwalbe, K. (2004), Information Technology Project Management, 3rd ed., Thomson Learning – Course Technology, Park City, UT, pp. 275-82. Stamatis, D.H. (2000), “Who needs Six Sigma anyway?”, Quality Digest e-Store, available at: www.qualitydigest.com/may00/html/sixsigmacon.html (accessed 30 January 2004). Vokurka, R.J. (2003), “Using the Baldrige criteria for personal quality improvement”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 101 No. 7, pp. 363-70. Further reading Blakeslee, J.A. Jr (1999), “Achieving quantum leaps in quality and competitiveness: implementing the Six Sigma solution in your company”, ASQ’s 53rd Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, May. Bonsignore, M.R. (1999), “Keynote address”, paper presented at Quality New Jersey Conference, 6 December, available at: www.honeywell.com/about/pagel5_3.html (accessed 24 January 2004). Dusharme, D. (2004), “Six Sigma Survey: Big Success. . .But What About the other 98 percent?”, February, available at: www.qualitydigest.com/feb03/articles/01_article.shtml (accessed 9 February 2004). Fortenot, G., Behara, R. and Gresham, A. (1994), “Six Sigma in customer satisfaction”, Quality Progress, Vol. 27 No. 12, pp. 73-8. Harry, M. and Schroeder, R. (1999), Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’s Top Corporations, Doubleday, New York, NY. Latzko, W.J. (1995), Notes on the Six Sigma Concept. Pyzdek, T. (n.d.), The Six Sigma Revolution, available at: www.qualityamerica.com/ knowledgecente/articles/pyzdeksixsig (accessed 30 January 2004). Shankar, S.J. (2000), “Using Six Sigma for growth”, New Straits Times, 28 March. Way, P. IV (2000), “Honeywell posts record first quarter earnings”, Defense Daily, 14 April, pp. 14-19. Six Sigma: concepts, tools, and applications 505