Preview

Jake

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
858 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jake
1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” Jake’s actions are considered in his scope of employment for his specific role as a mechanic for his employment at the auto dealership. Jake notes to his employer, Herman that he has been working overtime for two days during the free oil change deal at the auto dealership. Jake tells Herman that he believes if he is doing the extra work for the car dealership’s special, he should be fairly compensated. In accordance with the FLSA (Federal Labor Standards Act) the U.S. Department of Labor defines that employees that work more than forty hours per week must be paid one and a half times their regular pay. In compliance with the FLSA, it does indeed confirm that Jake has every right to demand overtime pay at time and a half for his contributions to the car dealership. The FLSA actually further defines the law for “blue collar workers” and is known as: Section 13(a)(1) The Blue-Collar Workers and the Part 541 Exemptions Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) summarizes that blue collar workers that do repetitive work with their hands are indeed entitled to overtime premium pay and minimum wage. Other non-management employees such as construction workers, craftsmen, electricians, and other similar occupations are also considered in the same category as mechanics and justify proper and appropriate overtime compensation. Furthermore, the law states they must be compensated no matter how high that pay might be.

2. Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. Herman is indeed responsible to take into action workers’ compensation (if necessary) for Jake’s injury because of the fact the injury occurred on the job site. Jake has been working overtime and with working these extra hours he felt as if he couldn’t tell the difference between his thumb and a spark plug, thus resulting in an injury to his thumb. Workers’ compensation somewhat varies



References: http://www.dol.gov/whd/flsa/ http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/workcomp/index.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Sanders Case Summary

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The claimant lost 3 weeks off from work and returned back to work with light modified work duties as a “Driver.” The claimant was eventually medially released to come back to work full duty. The claimant’s brother, Mr. Jorge Villalobos who was apprehensive about being questioned about his brother’s workers’ comp claim, was not privy to any of the alleged injuries that his brother is alleging in his claim. Mr. Jorge Villalobos, claimed the claimant saw a chiropractor for a back problem approximately five years ago and was not privy to the extent of the claimant’s alleged back injury; or were work related. As for reasons unknown, Mr. Villalobos alleged the claimant started wearing a hearing aid on his right ear 3 years ago.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stokely is responsible for injuring the motorcyclist while driving a vehicle from AAA Auto Dealers. Employers are vicariously liable under the respondeat superior doctrine. In the respondeat superior doctrine, in most cases, an employer is responsible for the actions of employees performed within the scope of employment. John Stokely used the company’s vehicle for personal reasons, regardless of what they were, and negligently collided into and injured someone on a motorcycle. John Stokely is a sales executive for AAA Auto Dealers. Not only did he use the company’s car for personal reasons, his boss accompanied him on the visit to a family member’s house for dinner. The boss was excusing John Stokely’s behavior, allowing him to use company property for a different purpose other than what it was intended for. John Stokely’s boss accompanied him to his cousin’s house so it can be argued that John Stokely had “permission” to do what he wanted. The boss will be held responsible by the owner(s) of AAA Auto Dealers as well by allowing John Stokely to act outside of his job description.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justin King Case Study

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Please identify your employer in which you filed to, and state what you were doing as per your job description at the time of the accident.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Alvarez Interview

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He claims to know the proper procedures to report a job-related injury within 24 hours of the incident. He has attended some in-house safety training classes each month. He recalled from the classes which he took that he must immediately report any work-related injury or illness immediately to their Supervisor.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lavr Johnson Wheaton Case

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wheaton is liable for the manager’s injuries. Under the doctrine of Respondeat Superior Liability. The principle in this case would be Wheaton and the agent would be LaVar Johnson. Under this doctrine an employer is liable for torts committed by agents, who are employees and who commit the tort while acting within the scope their employment, in addition, it also makes the principal liable both for an employees' negligence and for her intentional torts (pg. 944).…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of the employee who claims that she was treated dishonestly by working overtime without being paid. I believe since she was a salaried, exempt department manager in other instance she would not have a case ,but since she did jobs that did not fall within the categories that make her an exempt employee, she has a chance at winning her case in which she is seeking $18,000 in unpaid overtime. Exempt workers are personnel who, centered on the responsibilities executed and the method of payment, are exempt from the FLSA minimum wage and overtime requirements. To be exempt, an employee must qualify under one or more of the following tests: executive, administrative, professional, computer, and highly compensated employee exemption test (UCMerced, 2012).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Holding an employer liable for the actions of an employee may be a more complicated case than a typical personal injury compensation case. To learn more about your right to pursue compensation from an employer, seek legal counsel. An attorney can determine if you have a case and help assemble the evidence necessary to prove…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The description for Workers Compensation states, there must be an employment relationship, and the injury must be accidental and occur on the job or in the course of employment. Such elucidation referenced before us, signals that Angus is in enforceable right to collect workers…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act and its extensions, provide medical benefits, compensation for lost wages, and rehabilitation services to employees who are injured during the course of employment or contract an occupational disease related to employment. Survivor benefits also are provided if the work-related injury causes the employee's death.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FLSA Case Study

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) affects most public and private employment. The act requires employers to pay employees, who are not otherwise exempt, at least the federal minimum wage and overtime pay for more than 40 hours worked in a given workweek. The FLSA was originally established in 1934, but has been amended several times in order to make changes to the minimum wage requirements. The issue at hand is whether the employee should be compensated for the 36 hours of overtime associated with working out and conditioning and if on call time should be counted as overtime as well. I believe that despite the fact that being a member of SWAT requires great conditioning, the time used at the gym should not count as hours worked and thus should not be paid out as overtime. The employer most likely used the primary duty test in which they determined the primary duty of the job is not exercising in the gym,…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FLSA Research Paper

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FLSA requires observance with payment of minimum wage. The federal minimum wage according to the US department of Labor "for covered nonexempt employees is $5.15 per hour. The federal minimum wage provisions are contained in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Many states also have minimum wage laws. Where an employee is subject to both the state and federal minimum wage laws, the employee is entitled to the higher of the two minimum wages." (www.dol.gov) FLSA does not take the place of any state or local laws that are more favorable to employees. For Example, in the state of California, minimum wage is 6.75/hour, so the employee would profit from taking the larger of the two hourly wages. The FLSA explains "no employer shall employ any of his employees for a workweek longer than forty hours unless such employee receives compensation for his employment in excess of [forty] hours . . . at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which he is employed." (Law enforcement…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many employers have been baffled as they attempt to sort through the overlapping obligations created when a sick or injured worker's medical condition triggers the different rights and responsibilities under new federal laws. If businesses want to avoid costly lawsuits from disgruntled employees it is essential to understand their responsibilities under the laws. Employers must make a two-part analysis to determine which laws apply to the situation. Just because an employee qualifies under one law does not mean the employee will automatically qualify under another. To reduce problems, employers should give injured…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law, Tort Law

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In this case, Tim can definitely claim against Danny as Danny has surely commit a tortuous action towards Tim. Tort is a French word for wrong and tort has three categories namely intentional torts, unintentional torts (negligence), and strict liability (Cheeseman, 2010). This case is specifically classified as unintentional tort or negligence. The victim could claim damages sought from the offending party (Cheeseman, 2010). Since Tim was injured, he could bring a civil lawsuit against Danny. This is possible as there are criteria concerning the conduct of negligence.…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “See Aggression...Do Aggression” Bandura’s theoretical proposition was that he believed that children can learn to be aggressive. Bandura decided to conduct an experiment to see if he was right. He believed that if you expose a child to either a aggressive model or a nonaggressive model that the children would imitate the actions of the model. His test would show to just what extent the children mimic the behaviors displayed.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Equal Pay Act

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The story begins at a local Wal-Mart super center, its Friday, payday. As employees open their paychecks they are awaiting their annual raise. As one employee, Sue opens up her paycheck she finds she has not yet received a raise; she has waited all year for this raise. She is very sad to find she did not receive one, she begins to think maybe she did something wrong. She starts to think back through the year, and can not seem to come up with any solutions as to why she did not receive one. She really felt she worked especially hard that year in hopes to receive a good raise and really felt she deserved to be recognized for it. In the break room she overhears John, her follow co-worker, bragging to their colleague 's about his second raise. Now John is making $1.25 more per hour than her even though they both have been working at Wal-Mart for two years. They both have the same job descriptions and titles so there should not be differences in their pay. Sue can not quite understand why he received two when she only received one. She has seen him numerous times being tardy for work or calling in sick. She knows she is a better worker and is more efficient. Sue recently took a human resource class at Buffalo State College and she remembers learning about a law regarding equal pay. She can 't seem to recall the specifics, so she is determined to look into it further and fix the problem.…

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays