Preview

Jamilah Ethical Dilemmas

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jamilah Ethical Dilemmas
A1. Introduction/Potential Ethical Dilemmas

Jamilah Shah arrived at the hospital after collapsing. Once testing was completed, it was determined that Jamilah suffered from a heart attack. A decision regarding whether further treatment is going to be done needs to be made quickly, but before a decision can be made, all aspects of her health and quality of life need to be assessed/considered. Many potential ethical dilemmas exist in this situation. These include disagreeing opinions between the healthcare team members and disagreeing opinions between the family members and the patient. The healthcare team wants to do anything they can to help with Jamilah’s treatment, while the family, mainly the oldest son Bashir, does not want any further treatment to be done. Jamilah has stated to the social worker that she does want help and does want to live. The three specific dilemmas involved in this situation are autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence.

A1a. Ethical Principles and Legal Requirements

Autonomy: This ethical principle is conflicting due to many factors. Due to the patient’s language barrier, it is hard to recognize that the patient is able to make her own decisions. Jamilah stated clearly to the social worker “please help me. I want to live.” The patient being 90 years old and living in an extended care facility, leads her
…show more content…
It needs to be found out and understood why he is deciding this route. The ethics committee needs to question him about whether Jamilah had expressed these wishes to him previously. The patient’s other children should also be included in the decision making, for the continuation or stopping of treatment. If the other children are not included in the decision making and the decision to not treat Jamilah is made leading to her death, there is a possibility that the other children could come back and blame the hospital for not consulting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first legal issue in this case is patient consent. To perform any medical intervention or move ahead with a given treatment doctors need the authorization of the patient or his legal guardian. If doctors perform the treatment without this consent they could be charged for battery or negligence. In this case, Mr. Jones verbalized he do not want any intervention and that he wants his body intact then doctors cannot undertake the proposed treatment. However, Mr. Jones daughter disagrees.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsm 542 week 2 you decide

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The morals in conflict here are justice, non-maleficence and autonomy. The doctors, nurse, social workers, and ethics committee need to be sure that non-maleficence is not being implemented while considering Whitson’s right to make her own choice about wanting to live also the risks and benefits that could go along with her request to remove her pacemaker.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jamilah Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this scenario, Jamilah Shah, a 90-year-old Turkish immigrant who speaks basic English, was admitted to the hospital after collapsing in her bed in an ECF. Tests and labs show that Jamilah had a heart attack. She has no advanced directives on file and her youngest son, Bashir, is her emergency contact. The healthcare team is divided on how to proceed with treatment, as Bashir is requesting only comfort care, while her social service worker is advocating for medical intervention based on their duty of care and Jamilah's desire to live with this statement "please help me, I want to live." The ethical dilemmas in this scenario include autonomy, non-maleficence, and beneficence.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dilemmas that may arise between the duty of care and an Individuals rights. Despite all the efforts of healthcare providers to ensure an Individual receives the best possible care there might arise conflicts and dilemmas between healthcare worker & service user. Those conflicts may include: refusing a meal, type of activity, refusing medication or a treatment. Arising conflicts should be resolved as quickly as possible in a most satisfactory manner for both sides. The Human Rights Acts states that every person has the right to decide about their own life, they can refuse the treatments & medication they receive. It is essential to explain why they need that particular care & make them aware of pros and cons.…

    • 512 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the health care field there will always be ethical dilemmas to contend with and the majority of these are the most difficult to imagine. In this case, a 96 year old male cancer patient is receiving naturopathic treatment from his daughter who happens to be a physician in that field. This has caused conflict between the daughter and the regular physicians due to the fact that they feel she may be causing her father unnecessary pain as well as speeding up his death. The scope of healthcare ethics encompasses the decision making process and how it relates to what is right and what is wrong. Therefore it is important…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    4.1 Describe ethical dilemmas that may arise in own area of responsibility when balancing individual rights and duty of care…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patient autonomy refers to S.Z deciding what the best option for himself is, whether that is discharging home to continue working with his curandero for management of his conditions, or discharging to a nursing home (Potter et al., 2015). While members of the health care team and his daughter may not believe the best option is for him to continue working with the curandero, they have to respect S.Z’s decision. Overall the goal of patient autonomy is to decide the best course of action for the patient, keeping the patient’s wishes in mind (Potter et al., 2015). By meeting with his primary care provider, S.Z can explain his rational for seeing a curandero and why he is not taking his prescription medication; the doctor can also asses S.Z’s mental health from his wife passing away. This steps into the second supporting point for the solution – having S.Z’s provider educate him on different treatment…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is evident that Marianne’s husband values life because of the fact that he “wants to try everything” (Blais & Hayes, 2011, p. 175). The children; however, seem to value the quality of life. They do not want to risk surgery if it does not offer body and mind functionality. Marianne’s husband may be in denial about the condition of his wife as well as being in shock because of the suddenness of the accident. The conflicting opinions of Marianne’s family will need to be addressed and further explored with the ethics committee before a final decision can be made. It is the health team’s responsibility to understand the family’s values, opinions, and desires for Marianne when preparing for the meeting to discuss her future care. The team must also understand any values or opinions they may bring to the situation at hand. Unlike the…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alternatively, the four ethical principals can be applied to the case of the refusal of blood transfusions and a given cultural group. A patient who is competent in their decision making always overrides the physician’s choice for the patient. Macklin (2003) states that “the respect for persons principle mandates that physicians should comply with the expressed wishes of a competent adult patient even if the predicted consequences are unfavorable or grave” (p. 275-280). No maleficence and beneficence are ethical principles that could be used to contradict the patient’s ethical rights in specific situations. Macklin (2009) states that the “principle of no maleficence requires physicians to avoid harm, whenever possible, so withholding a proven, beneficial treatment is likely to have the consequence of producing harm” (275-280). The next type of ethical principle, beneficence explains that the physician can increase benefits, and reduce detriment to the patient can also be useful when the clinician wishes to give blood to the patient even when the patient opposed the transfusion (Macklin, 2009). In the case of the blood transfusion scenario, all four principles cannot be adequately used to solve ethical issues in the healthcare organization. Macklin (2009) states…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jcaho Case

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Autonomy, beneficence, and justice are three ethical theories. Autonomy is self-determination. The patient has the right to make their own health care decision even if it not the best option and the provider has to respect the right of the patient. Beneficence is the obligation to do good for the patient or try…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This group is faced with new ethical dilemmas everyday whether that be regarding the treatment which patients decide to have or those which relate to the withdrawing of life saving care.…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “four principles of biomedical ethics of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice” (Cooper, 2012), however, this case shows autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence clashing. The patient and her family have the right to determine the patient’s care; yet, following the patient’s mother’s decision has the potential of causing harm to the…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Up holding the patient’s wishes to the best of the nurse’s abilities can seem fairly straight forward. Often, there are situations where this could be hindered by the family, who also have good intentions to protect the patient. Although the nurse may feel strongly to advocate for the patient, in these situations, it becomes difficult to ignore the request of the family who know the patient and have their best interest at heart. This creates an ethical dilemma as to how to approach the situation because there is no clear answer to what would be best for the patient.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomy In Nursing

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, nobody is present from their family to make decision on their behalf. This could give rise the ethical problem and dilemma for a nurse and/or for a paramedic because patient refused treatment. It would result in delay in patient care (Betts, 2013). Although to build effective relationship with a patient, trust is really important and this can only build by maintaining the patient autonomy (Betts, 2013). Autonomy of the patient is admired by ethical code of conduct and regulations as outlined by Australian Medical Association (AMA). It defines that for health care providers, the thought of the good health of patient should be kept at prime precedence (Townsend & Luck,…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An ethical dilemma exists when the right thing to do is not clear or when members of the health care team cannot agree on the right thing to do (Potter, Perry, Stockert, & Hall, 2011). S.Z. is a 65-year-old Hispanic man who was admitted to the hospital for the third time in 6 months, for hyperglycemia. He is now scheduled to be discharged but his daughter pleads with the nurse that she does not want her father discharged because he is non-complaint with his medications and diet at home. She says she has small children at home and can’t be responsible for him, too. She is worried sick that he is doing this on purpose because he has been so depressed since her mother, who did everything for him, passed away. She says that her father has been seeing a curanderos, who treats him with traditional methods and that he refuses to take his medicine and only follows what the curanderos tells him to do. She does not agree with this and confides that she hopes to find a way to prevent her father from seeing this person and wants to know if the nurse can have her father’s discharge canceled and to ask the doctor to admit him to a nursing home where they can ensure he eats right and takes his medicine and not the herbs he has been using. Then she pleads, “Please just tell the doctor he won’t take his medicine.” Many years ago he was diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus Type II and has been on insulin for two years. His blood sugar on admission was 589. He is retired and was widowed one year ago. He’s active in his church, gardens, and likes to work on small projects around the house. His medical history includes Diabetes Mellitus Type II, insulin dependent, Hyperlipidemia, and Osteoarthritis.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays