Preview

Japan's Nuclear Power Crisis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Japan's Nuclear Power Crisis
The Nuclear Power Crisis In Japan
Rabeea Bakrea
Introduction:-
Japan right now is facing a great energy problem, since the Tsunami on March 11th, 2011 the country shut down most of the Nuclear Power Plants for maintenance purposes but until now, they did not come back to normal, talking in numbers 43 out of 52 Nuclear Power Plants were shut down (The Economist, 2011). Japan is one of the largest nuclear power countries in the world, with 52 plants in operation, three under construction and 11 planned for the future. Approximately 25% of electricity in Japan is generated by nuclear power. Japan is currently the world’s third largest nuclear power, following the U.S. and France. Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF) in Japan is what represents the Nuclear Power Industry, it was established in 1956 to promote peaceful use of Nuclear Power (JST News, 2008). The Japanese government is rethinking about their energy policy and finding new energy supply after the disaster of Tsunami 2011 (BJT News, 2012).
Causes Of The Nuclear Power Crisis:-
The roots of the Nuclear Power crisis refer to the day of March 11th, 2011 when the Tsunami waves attacked the Japanese island and one of many targets was the Fukushima Nuclear Plant which is the number 1 station (The Guardian, 2011). Ken Koyama, Chief Economist at Japan’s Institute of Energy Economics said that the accident in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant have made Japanese to rethink on its reliance on nuclear power and increasing demands for oil (BJT News, 2012).
Consequences And Alternative Solutions:-
“The bottom line is that without nuclear power Japan will have a very hard time meeting demand," said Paul Scalise, a fellow at the University of Tokyo who specializes in Japan's energy sector.” Real change has been slow. Giant solar arrays and wind farms can't be built overnight and powerful utilities that spent billions on nuclear are lobbying to protect their interests. Oil, coal and gas now generate about nearly 90% of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Japanese population is very mad and worried over all the Nuclear Power Plants. Nowadays, 1 year after the Nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan closed down 52 of all 54 Nuclear Power Plants, 2 are still open.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one ...…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These scenarios have led to nuclear power having a very bad public reputation despite numerous statistics showing that other energy sources have been much more…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All over the world empires have arisen, they are unique, different, and in some ways the same. How they came to be is always an interesting tale, from the very first people who had a vision for the future to the more recent ones who take care of that vision. The large centers in the world now were once just the beginnings of a village or small town. And in similar ways the Ottoman and Spanish empires were built up, but there are many differences between the two. Both the Ottomans and the Spanish used their military forces to capture more land, and used their powerful governments to encourage a religion that would help to unify their people and empires, making religion the primary unifier.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power’s bad reputation has come about due to the accident at nuclear plants such as Chernobyl in Ukraine, Fukushima in Japan and Three Mile Island in the USA. Chernobyl was one of the only ones out of three that has been classified as a “major accident” by The International Atomic Energy Agency; the other was the accident at Fukushima. The reason the Chernobyl accident was considered a “major accident”, was due to the emergency shutdown failing, with a full melt down being achieved. This area is not able to be populated ever again due to the extreme…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. In “Small Recactors Make a Bid to Revive Nuclear Power”, the Obama Administration and the Energy Department are working on making America the leader in advanced nuclear technology and manufacturing (Biello 2012). They are considering switching the large reactors, which are currently the predominant technology, to small reactors, which will save money. These reactors would contain enough power to power more than 200,000 U.S. homes for a year (Biello 2012). This strategy will cause less nuclear waste and will increase safety issues as well. In another article, “Time to revive, not kill, the nuclear age”, it is stated that a world without nuclear power would be less secure. Neither fossil fuels nor renewable resources will be able to replace the 14 percent of global electricity generated by nuclear reactors (Financial Times 2011). This article sides with MacFarlane by saying the Chernobyl accident was bad, but since then things…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul L. Joskow & John E. Parsons. “The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima”. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. (2012): 1-30.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The cost of power plants, along with the potential dangers of nuclear energy, tends to repel people from converting to the energy source. Constructing, equipping, engineering and providing labor for power plants can cost billions of dollars. The waste left behind from the energy is extremely hazardous and difficult to dispose of. Although the possibility is very slim, there’s a chance for nuclear accidents to occur in the power plants. However, these problems have solutions and nuclear energy still poses a great alternative energy source that could benefit…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Solar and wind energy depend on the weather conditions (“Nuclear Energy”,n.d.). They cannot produce energy at any time. On the other hand, there is enough uranium for nuclear power for another seventy to eighty years(“Nuclear Energy”, n.d.). Also, nuclear reactors can produce energy without interrupting even for a year due to its working process mode (“Nuclear Energy ”, n.d.). Moreover, the nuclear plants need to refuel every only eighteen to twenty for months (“On Reliability”,n.d.). In 2014 in the U.S the capacity factor maintained between 95 and 98 percent, that allowed consumers to keep their light and heat on 24/7 even in extreme hot and cold weather (“Nuclear Matters ”, n.d.).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays