Preview

Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Reactors

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Reactors
Should Nuclear Reactors to Be Built?
Obada Al Ajami
213110122
Section # 65
Prince Sultan University

In these days, weather crisis has been increasing dramatically due to our pollution. There are around 437 nuclear power plants around the world and 66 under construction (). Do you think that nuclear power is useful and preferable to use in our daily life by building nuclear reactors? It is a debatable issue; with some people in favor of this idea and others opposed to it. According to Riccio, nuclear reactors are dangerous and expensive to construct (Riccio, 2011). However, the safety instructions must be followed and the financial problem is easy to solve. So, nuclear reactors should be built to produce electricity for several
…show more content…
Solar and wind energy depend on the weather conditions (“Nuclear Energy”,n.d.). They cannot produce energy at any time. On the other hand, there is enough uranium for nuclear power for another seventy to eighty years(“Nuclear Energy”, n.d.). Also, nuclear reactors can produce energy without interrupting even for a year due to its working process mode (“Nuclear Energy ”, n.d.). Moreover, the nuclear plants need to refuel every only eighteen to twenty for months (“On Reliability”,n.d.). In 2014 in the U.S the capacity factor maintained between 95 and 98 percent, that allowed consumers to keep their light and heat on 24/7 even in extreme hot and cold weather (“Nuclear Matters ”, n.d.).
Besides environment and reliability, nuclear energy has more efficiency than burning fossil fuels. It has high energy density viruses to fossil fuels (“Nuclear Energy”, n.d.). To illustrate, a gram of uranium releases an amount of energy much more than a gram of coal or oil; approximately eight thousand times(Parker, 2010). However, that is also excellent for the environment because if the electricity -which is produced by nuclear power- produced by using the coal, will generate 147 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (Nuclear Power Institute,
…show more content…
(n.d.). Conserve Energy Future, Retrieved from: http://www.conserve-energy-future.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-energy.php
Nuclear Matters. (n.d.). Nuclear Benefits: Always-On Reliability, Retrieved from: http://www.nuclearmatters.com/reliable-power
Nuclear Power Institute. (n.d.). Nuclear Energy is one of the most efficient sources of energy, Retrieved from: http://nuclearpowerinstitute.org/did-you-know/nuclear-energy-is-one-of-the-most-efficient-sources-of-energy/
Parker, W.(2010). Nuclear Power, Retrieved from: https://www.iop.org/activity/groups/subject/env/prize/file_52570.pdf
Riccio, J. (2011, October). Con: A Bad Investment All Around. Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Retrieved from: http://www.bloomberg.com/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power is produced through the use of nuclear reactions to produce nuclear energy that can then be harnessed to generate heat and create superheated steam to drive turbines. The most common nuclear reaction is that of nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom’s nucleus into smaller nuclei. Nuclear reactions are incredibly energy dense and thus allow nuclear reactors to make a tremendous amount of electricity. There are only 61 nuclear power plants in the United States, but they account for 19 percent of the entire country’s electricity production. [8][14] There are 7,304 total power plants in the United States, so nuclear plants on average produce over twenty-eight times as much energy as another plant in the U.S.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world where technology and advancements has flourished, majority comes to one main source to run on… Energy. There is several alternative methods on producing energy, some more efficient or safer than others. The most common and traditional source of energy in today's world is coal power, but other alternatives do exist such as that of natural gas, solar, wind, hydroelectric and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is the 3rd most common source of our energy. Nuclear energy was first introduced in 1954 in Russia with the first power plant. Nuclear energy provides about 20% of today's electricity and does provide a substantial amount of energy, but does provide threats of radioactivity.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans have always tried to find innovative, powerful and valid energy sources in order to be able to supply the several needs of modern societies. In this sense, nuclear power is considered one of the most controversial technologies related to the new millennium.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sovacool, Benjamin K. “Nuclear Energy and Renewable Power: Which is the Best Climate Change Mitigation Option?” Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology 39: 758-762. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=40086266&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The chemical reaction that creates nuclear power is known as nuclear fission. When uranium is blasted with fast-moving atoms known as neutrinos, they become unstable and split, releasing more fast-moving neutrinos and energy in the form of radiation (Redd). When nuclear fission occurs, there are byproducts of the fuel known as fission products. Fission products are highly radioactive and will be such for thousands of years. The current method of disposal is storage in water to shield the outside world from the radiation until it decays enough to be stored deep within the Earth. Other methods include the recycling and transmutation of waste into other products and the incineration of waste within the Sun (Touran). Although it may seem that nuclear energy isn’t safe for the environment, it is exponentially cleaner than current fossil fuels. By 2013, it has on average prevented 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas and 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths (Hansen and Pushker). With the replacement of fossil fuels as an energy source, this number can only…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The amount of fuel needed to power plants is significantly less than the amount of fossil fuel needed for other energy sources. In addition to other advantages, “the energy released by nuclear fission is approximately ten million times greater than the amount of energy released by fossil fuel atom”(Nuclear Pros and Cons). Turning atomic heat into electricity is a much simpler process than turning fossil fuel into electricity. In a nuclear power plant, “the machinery is very similar to the machinery used in fossil fuel plants and has had most of the kinks worked out, so it is quite reliable. Because the mass of material that has to run through the plant every day is several powers of ten smaller than similarly sized fossil fuel plants, fission plants can be far simpler, less dependent on external supply chains, and easier to operate”(Adams). The production of energy from fossil fuels is expected to increase, so substituting nuclear energy for fossil fuels will indubitably be better for our…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011 has risen our awareness on using nuclear energy and we have since begun to re-evaluate the possibility of promoting the use of the technology widely. Despite the potential dangers it can induce, there are some benefits it has brought which are worth noticing.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays