Preview

Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the Institute of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the Institute of Government
Contemporary Civilizations

GENERAL WILL & MAJORITY RULE
Jean-Jacques Rousseau on the Institute of Government

Rousseau’s notion of General Will possesses a direct correlation to the idea of general welfare and the common interests of a people as a whole. In On The Social Contract he explains the philosophy being the idea of General Will by stating that "So long as several men together consider themselves to be a single body, they have but a single will, which is concerned with their common preservation and the general well-being" (Social Contract IV.1). This implies that the General Will is the natural and instinctive desire of all people within a group to act in favor of the perpetuation and common good of the group as a whole. In his discussion on General Will, Rousseau states directly that the General Will “is always right and always tends towards public unity” (Social Contract II.3). In theory, the validation of this claim can be supported by his further elaboration about the fact that “there is a great deal of difference between the will of all and the general will. The latter considers only the general interests, whereas the former considers private interests and is merely the sum of private wills” (Social Contract II.3). By this explanation the General Will consists only of the desires of the populations completely devoid of private interest. In many ways, this makes the General Will and extremely theoretical concept, as it involves an assumption of human nature and the presumed separation of individual facets. On the assumptions about human nature that the idea of General Will implies, Rousseau estimates that "Each man, in detaching his interest from the common interest, clearly sees that he cannot totally separate himself from it; but his share of the public misfortune seems insignificant to him compared to the exclusive good he intends to make his own. Apart from this private good, he wants the general good in his own interest, just as strongly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 20014 Attorney General Eric Holder requested that the U.S. Sentencing Commission study the use of algorithms “Although these measures were crafted with the best intentions, I am concerned that they inadvertently undermine our efforts to ensure individualized and equal justice” he also felt that “they may exacerbate unwarranted and unjust disparities that are already far too common in our criminal justice system and in our society”.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau’s makes it clear that “the only will dominating government should be the general will or the law.” The National Assembly of France used this principle in the sixth listed right in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen which reads that “the law is an expression of the general will.” The general will, as Rousseau states, is for the best of the common interest of the country. The king will not always act in the best interest of his country, so it is imperative to form a constitutional monarchy that seeks to act in the best interest of the general…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Declaration of Independence,” written by Thomas Jefferson, is a statement adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776. “The Origin of Civil Society” is an article written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Jefferson writes about human rights because all men shall be equal and free; Rousseau writes about social contracts because by understanding the concepts of social contracts, the people will live with better security and significance. By analyzing these two articles, readers can see how important it is for a writer to understand the concepts from previous generation of writers, how much Rousseau’s ideas have influenced Jefferson’s statement, and how Jefferson has expanded Rousseau’s concepts.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethnocentrism is a concept that is referred to a lot in “Society Explained” by Nathan Rousseau. The author describes ethnocentrism as when we think that what we know and are used to is better or more right than something new that is put in front of us. This concept can be applied to many life events. For example ethnocentrism can be applied to my life when talking about college and picking which school I wanted to go to.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of these authors share some similar points, but the majority spoken is disagreement. I would expect this when there are men and women speaking their views during enlightenment. Of course, the men see women as objects to look good for them while requiring no education or the ability to reason.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political unions define our lives. They are the basis for the laws that govern our actions and, perhaps, even our thoughts. So long as governments exist, people must work to discover their ideal structure. James Madison, in “Federalist Paper Number 10” and “A Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments,” and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in The Social Contract, each try to determine this structure, and they both assume that stability is vital to an ideally functioning society. Nevertheless, when it comes to the government’s power, Madison and Rousseau have little in common. Madison believes that the government is bound by a “great Barrier” which defends the individual's’ rights and that any government breaching this barrier becomes a tyrant. In stark contrast, Rousseau claims that when people join together…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Child Care Unit 001

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sensory barriers: When someone cannot receive or pass on information because they have a impairment to one or more of their senses, the most common is hearing or seeing.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.J. Rousseau was an optimistic Enlightenment thinker. He believed that people were born naturally good but that the cruel society corrupted him. His optimistic beliefs are showed in The Social Contract, in which he expressed his belief of general will. He argued that the individual replaced the monarch as the true source of power. Rousseau also argued that the general will was not that of the majority but it was the will of a far-seeing minority…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Second Treatise of Government, Locke asserts that humans are born with a natural right to life, liberty and property. He further explains that these individuals are bound morally to respect the rights of every member of that society. Yet he acknowledges advances in society, which impair such state to exist. Locke believes that not all members of the state of nature will respect those rights and further emphasizes the need to create a social contract, which protects these rights. For the only reason a state, or government is established is to protect themselves from anyone who chooses to act immorally consequently preventing them from preserving their natural rights.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    31. The Navigation Acts of 1651 were British laws that restricted colonial trade. They were designed to do two things: force the thirteen colonies to trade only with Britain and weaken Britain’s rivals, especially the Dutch. The Acts placed limits on how the colonies could trade with other countries. For example, heavy taxes meant that colonists taxed when they imported certain things from other nations. Limits in imports meant that ships from other nations could not deliver goods to the thirteen colonies. Lastly, limits on exports meant that many goods had to be shipped to a British port first, before they could be sold to other countries. The purpose of the laws was to restrict colonial trade through taxes.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays