Preview

Jesus Christ and the Atonement Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1674 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jesus Christ and the Atonement Theories
It can be said that in God's eyes, Christians are only dirty glasses which are stained inside and out with their own sin. These glasses were once clean, not plagued with stains. Now the glasses bear with them these ugly stains, the stains of sin and wrongdoing. The dirty glasses had to accept their punishment for becoming dirty, and the punishment was being destroyed by a hammer. The hammer is God's instrument against sinners. As the hammer made its decent on the glass, a pan covered the glass and took the blow of the hammer to save the glass. This pan represents Jesus because Jesus sacrificed himself to God so that God would forgive us for our sins. Atonement is the action of putting things right between us and God. This story illustrates a very simplified version of one Atonement theory. Jesus, the "Pan," accomplished Atonement by sacrificing himself for mercy and forgiveness. He died for us so God would forgive our sins. The Atonement theories themselves are different explanations to help interpret what God actually did to save us. In each of the four Atonement theories Jesus is the bridge that connects humanity and God and helps us connect to each other. We have multiple Atonement theories because there is no single, simple answer to solve the many questions of Jesus' death. One theory doesn't provide enough information and doesn't cover everything that needs to be said. Each Atonement theory is acceptable because there are multiple answers within them and all are correct. Since there are so many different answers they give, they tend to overlap and sometimes run into each other but they do this to cover every aspect and question that is presented in the theories. Since there are multiple Atonement theories, all Christians are going to have different opinions on which theory best fits Jesus' accomplishments. The personal opinion on the Atonement theories depends on how Christians look at Christianity and which model they think contributed more towards

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Though there are three different accounts of the Lord’s Last Supper in the bible—written by Matthew, Luke, and John—each record share common threads. Specifically speaking, the scriptures all express Jesus’ desire for people to, through the symbols of bread and wine, receive his body and blood in remembrance of him. In other words, through this symbolic and orderly process, all accounts show that Jesus wants his followers to remember the sacrifice he made: die on the cross to pay for mankind’s sins. Ultimately, I found these accounts to show Jesus suggesting a redemptive nature of his death.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jesus Christ: He is the most important figure in Christianity, held by tradition to have been the son of God. Christians believe that Jesus allowed himself to be crucified by the Romans to atone for the sins of humanity.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The one belief that unites all Christians is the belief in Jesus Christ. Christians believe that the only way to achieve salvation is to believe that Jesus died and rose again in order to save humanity from its sins.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That connection relates to How Jesus was sent to earth and sacrificed himself for us from God’s wrath. Jesus sacrificed himself so that we may live eternally with God and be forgiven for our sins and receive salvation through christ.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    4 MAT BOOK REVIEW 2

    • 1366 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ronald N. Nash does a great job in his book Is Jesus the only Savior, Ronald Nash not at one time left the truth of the Christian world at all; for a matter of fact Nash only brings out what every Christian should already know. In part one Nash takes apart the argument of Pluralistic1 but at the same time Nash keep in line with his beliefs in Christianity while pointed out Hick’s tactic in chapter five but I must bring out this part of one of Nash answer on p. 75, Nash says “it appears that Hick suffers from a blind spot or two. As Geivett observes, “clearly, Hick’s own moral intuitions have become a control on what he is willing to acknowledge as an authentic account of what Jesus said and did. Ronald N. Nash, p.81, 1994. How many times we see and hear this in today’s world how people want to see Jesus Christ the way they want too rather than to receive what the Bible says about our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. But Nash does not stop there but Nash goes on to say “Sir Norman Anderson faults Hick for greatly exaggerating the paucity of positive evidence we have about the one to whom he refers as the largely unknown man of Nazareth. Hick ignores Jesus own statements about his death, as attested by the Synoptic writers (Matt. 20:17-19: 26:12f; Mark 10-33f; Luke 18:31-34).” But in part two Nash takes his time and begin to focus on central points within the text, at the beginning of chapter eight Nash talks to us about General and Special Revelation how God took Abraham, Moses, and Paul, Nash pointed out to us that this is special revelation; because it is to bring human beings to a saving…

    • 1366 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Romans 2 Mere Christianity

    • 5366 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Romans 3:26 says that God did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus. In the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, God demonstrates that he is just even when he declares sinners to be just.…

    • 5366 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The idea can be summed up in the following words "The call of the Gospel is co-extensive with the atonement to all me, birth by word and the striving of the Spirit, so that salvation is rendered equally possible to all; and if any fail of eternal life, the fault is wholly his own". The FWB held to the belief men would be changed to a point where they would be able to choose for themselves salvation. When Christ gave His life this supplied the salvation to those that would believe, but the atonement would not be applied to this salvation. The only way the application of Christ's atonement would be placed on a man once he believed in Christ as Lord and savior then through the Spirit the atonement would apply to this…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case For Christ by Lee Strobel is a book about an agnostic who turns into a Christian through proof that Christ is genuine. Lee Strobel, He’s a journalist, who was once an agnostic and wrote numerous effective books.In this book he discusses how he attempted to see whether Christ truly existed. Lee Strobel makes extraordinary pionts, however, do they truly demonstrate anything?…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This term determines God hidden in suffering and humiliation of the cross of Christ. Luther used the phrase Deus crucifixus, which means “a crucified God,” as he speaks of the manner in which God shares in the sufferings of Christ. It was the late twentieth century that it was the “new orthodoxy” to speak of a suffering God. Traditional theology declared that Jesus Christ was indeed God incarnate. Therefore it seems to follow that God suffered in Christ. Christ suffered in his human nature, not divine. Thus God did not experience human suffering and remained unaffected by the aspect of the world (McGrath 221). God came to earth to put himself on the hook of human suffering. God experienced the greatest depths of pain. On the cross he went beyond even the worst human suffering and experienced cosmic rejection and pain that exceeds ours as infinitely as his knowledge and power exceeds ours (Keller 30). The Bible says that Jesus had to pay for our sins so that someday he can end evil and suffering without having to end…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    atonement by feeling guilty throughout his childhood and his adult life. He then furthers his…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Christianity and Jesus

    • 748 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This teaching can be used across the board for all worldviews. Although, these are the characteristics of Jesus’ teaching, these characteristics should be used by all. These are great morals that one should have regardless of the worldview.…

    • 748 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gospel of Mark and the Gospel of John each present an illustration of Jesus in both humanity and divinity. However, each gospel portrays Jesus in a different way. The Gospel of Mark focuses on the mortality aspect of Jesus such as the concern of dying. On the contrary the Gospel of John focuses on the spirituality aspect of Jesus, and the revelation of Jesus and the Father being one. Despite the differences in portrayal of Jesus leading up to the Last Supper. Throughout this event both Gospels portrays Jesus’ crucifixion, however, Mark present Jesus similarly to the Passover Lamb. John on the other hand reveals Jesus’ parting in preparation of what to come so that they may believe.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jesus, who was he. Some believe he was the son of God. Others believe he was a man trying to steal the throne. Jesus taught christianity to others. He wasn’t the only one teaching it. His twelve disciples helped him. Jesus was a Jew and many people hate Jews (Like Hitler, for example). Some say he died and some say he didn’t. People who believe he died say that he was crucified on the cross for his teaching and for being a Jew. People who believe he didn’t die say that he risen and is now in…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Jinkins illustrates, there is no greater cause for the believer than to “discover the character of God through the sufferings of Jesus Christ.” (Jinkins, 129) It is through finding the hidden treasure, that we might begin to understand the love of the Creator God. (Mt 13:44-45) The most convincing theory of the revelation of Christ, from Jinkins list, is “what John McLeod Campbell calls the ‘prospective aspect’ of the atonement.” (Jinkins, 150 italics original) The matter that most compels me with this view Campbell’s inclusion of the “depths of the Trinity, in the very inner life of God.” (Jinkins, 150) My spirit is stirred with awe for Christ, by a view which defines the atonement using language of relationship, love and self-sacrifice.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Calvin’s view of atonement was that Christ death was a particular atonement that He only died for the elect. This view gives us the understanding that we are all predestined by God. The Arminian view believes that Christ death was just a sacrificial offering where the death of an animal was deliverance from punishment. The death of Christ was a replacement for a punishment not a harsh equal for sin. [2] God promised to pardon sinners on the basis of Christ death. Paul relates this in his writings “for the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Rom 6:23).…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics