As seen in the previous argument, the State doesn't have the authority to force men into religion, to go against their own conscience. Going back to Locke’s state of nature, he insists on the consent aspect of men leaving that perfect equality in order to protect their property. Accordingly, we consent to leave the state of nature to enter a society and this very consent has to keep going in order to protect men's rights against Christianity authority. Analyzing the words of Locke, no men can desire to have the magistrate in their absolute power unless compelled by force against right of freedom: “No man by nature is bound unto any particular church or sect, but everyone joins himself voluntarily to that
As seen in the previous argument, the State doesn't have the authority to force men into religion, to go against their own conscience. Going back to Locke’s state of nature, he insists on the consent aspect of men leaving that perfect equality in order to protect their property. Accordingly, we consent to leave the state of nature to enter a society and this very consent has to keep going in order to protect men's rights against Christianity authority. Analyzing the words of Locke, no men can desire to have the magistrate in their absolute power unless compelled by force against right of freedom: “No man by nature is bound unto any particular church or sect, but everyone joins himself voluntarily to that