Preview

John Searle And The Combination Reply

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
In the last century we have seen modern technology grow from almost nothing into a leading power in our everyday lives. Technology aids us humans in so many different ways, and in all imaginable categories, that it would be impossible to list them all. One of the main technological advances that are used in almost every machine today, in some form or another, is a computer. Overtime the processing power of a computer has become immense, which started to beg the question can a computer ever think and or poses human like qualities and behaviors. John Searle does not believe that a computer can ever think because they do not have the intention to do so; however he believes that machines rather, could think. In this paper we will be discussing …show more content…

This objection is the sum of the systems reply, the robot reply, and the brain simulator reply. This is a powerful objection because it incorporates three other objections and combines them into one. When all combined the objection asks you too “imagine a robot with a brain shaped computer lodged in its cranial cavity, imagine the computer programmed with all the synapses of a human brain, imagine the whole behavior of the robot is indistinguishable, from human behavior, and now think of the whole thing as a unified system and not just as a computer with inputs and outputs.” In essence this robot would be indistinguishable from human beings for the most part. According to Searle indeed the robot would seem like a functioning person by viewing its behavior it would just be assumed that the robot thinks and has intentions in similar ways as humans. Now if it was known that this person was indeed a robot we would no long place those assumption upon it and realize that it is indeed programmed and thus has no intentionality so it cannot think. Searle continues, to compare this to the Chinese room analogy once again, imagine a person, not in the room, but in this robots brain who cannot see anything outside. All the input data from the sensory receptors would be sent, currently uninterpreted, to the person who would then manipulate it, via a set of rules, and send out the data to the motor functions of the robot. Now like a computer has no clue of what it is doing when it processes information, let’s imagine that the person inside the brain space of this robot has no idea of what they are translating these symbols for. At this point clearly the robot is not doing any thinking at all “The hypothesis that the dummy has a mind would now be unwarranted and unnecessary” Since the person inside is just manipulating symbols following a set of rules there is no intentionality,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As a well-known literary theorist, Fish is a contributor to the “Opinionator” column in the New York Times. Furthermore, he worked as a former professor at Duke University and Dean of Arts and Sciences at the University of Chicago. Throughout this article, Fish expresses his reservation of artificial intelligence systems’ cognitive abilities by explaining how Watson functions in actuality. The author furthermore attempts to shed light on the question of if Watson understands anything like human.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will…

    • 2143 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a novice programmer and a participant in Lego robotics I find the controversy surrounding artificial intelligence very intriguing. Programmers, computer scientists, and researchers alike have debated about the possibility of artificial intelligence becoming more intelligent than humans. Because I do have some knowledge of how computers work I can see why this topic is sparking so much interest. The thought of something that we created having the potential to surpass us is riveting. It’s impossible to fathom the idea that humans may lose their spot as the alphas of the world. In this paper I will break down the arguments surrounding this topic by putting them into simpler terms and prove why one side may be superior to the other.…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isaac Asimov's I, Robot

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The robots are governed by 3 main laws: “1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm 2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law 3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law (Asimov…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belkin and Turkle

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some believe that uniqueness is based on empathy or intimacy-based emotions that are expressed through shared experiences. If humans did not have the ability to share their thoughts and emotions, their relationship would be so awkward. In Turkle’s essay, robots are not really imitating humans because they are missing something the most important thing in human society, which is sharing emotions. Turkle says “ I am troubled by the idea of seeking intimacy with a machine that has no feelings, can have no feelings, and is really just a clever collection of “as if” performances, behaving as if it cared, as if it understood us” (Turkle 267). Robots easily accept any amount of memory and other information that are applied to them by humans. However, many people doubt if emotions and emotional interactions with humans can also be applied to robots. Certainly, that is impossible. Feelings, experience, or consciousness are some concepts that robots cannot implement or understand. Those characteristics are biological traits and robots are not a biological system. They are artificial and created by humans. Their body is filled with all different inorganic materials, which is totally different from human body. Also, they do not have any backgrounds and experiences that can sympathize with humans. They cannot love anyone back. Every information and data is just installed and put into their body. When things are implemented in robots, both emotions and feelings are performing such a crucial role that has to be accounted for. However, since emotions are not an electric activity that takes huge part in humans’ brain, no one would believe that robots would be able to have emotions as humans do. Furthermore, Blackmore believes that emotions contribute to human’s uniqueness. The author states, “We wage wars, believe in religions, bury our dead and get embarrassed about sex” (Blackmore 31). Robots, or any other machines, do not believe in any religions or get embarrassed about…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To be astonished at this fact is to underestimate the design complexity and sheer number of neurons present in the body. To assert there is a magical force called free will is unfounded and illogical. Your mind is governed by the same laws which govern all other matter of which you have no control. Free will, however, remains a popular belief mainly because of its connections to religion and the perception of introspection. When we introspect it is easy to convince ourselves that there is something spiritual inside; our mind is spontaneous, indecisive, creative, and often irrational. These qualities are, for the most part, absent in robotics, which supports a widely held belief that they can’t be synthesized. Determinism simply says that the mind can be predicted like a chemical reaction can be predicted; there is nothing special about our minds which hold them above physical laws. The mind is a complicated construct, and its vast number of interactions with the environment makes it impossible to predict. The simplest computer able to accurately model exactly what will occur in the human mind would be as complex as the universe itself. Because one does not have control over the functions inside one’s own brain, and because the…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asides from causing human social dysfunction, the robots are neither safer nor more reliable compared to human resources, which is totally opposite to most people’s common sense. One extreme case is that a women bought a robot to substitute for her boyfriend because she believes the machine is safer and will never betray her (Turkle, 2012). The main reason why she abandoned human boyfriend is the eager for “no-risk relationship” (Turkle, 2012). However, does this machine which always obeys her order and never has different thoughts really give her boyfriend-like care? The technology of human replacement robots is not advanced enough and still limited by huge barriers. For example, a kind of robot works as an alternative role to those disabled students who have problems attend classroom, can’t guarantee receiving perfect wireless signal when moving in the campus (Brown, 2013).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will examine…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As robots are made to perform some specific work or task, people believe that robots would make no mistakes and so, “they would prefer a robot to a human in some tasks, such as housework and reminding patients to take medication”.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    . However throughout the movie, there is much talk about the similarities and differences between humans and robots, particularly when a persons soul is concerned. In a speech captured on video just before he died, Dr. Lanning suggests that random bits of programming join together within the robots' brain and eventually cause robots to have free will, creativity, and even dreams, just as humans do.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Searle Functionalism

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Chinese Room argument shows that computers do not have intentionality, as well as many other non-human thinking things. It argues for functionalism saying that if something has the ability to fully use our minds, it has intentionality, if it is only able to mimic our minds, it does not have…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the duration of this paper I will be discussing in depth some of…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kevin Kelly article “Better Than Human” explains that people should not be reluctant or scared that robots will soon be the norm. Robots are being made to work together with humans to improve the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the viewer can such a powerful connection to a robot raises important characteristics about what exactly makes one human. These characters, act human and have flesh, even if it is intertwined with electronics. Especially the characters such as Dolores who have received the latest update to have “revelries” to change from past experiences act human and almost seem to have a conscious.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few years ago, computers were practically unheard of by most people. Today, computers are one of the most powerful tools throughout the world. The world has changed since these machines have come along. They play a huge part in many all of our lives in one way or another. And it’s almost scary to stop and think how much we rely on them on our day-to-day routine. People always tend to seek the easy way out looking for something that would make their lives easier. These machines and tools have given us the ability to do more in less time giving us, at the same time, more comfort. As the technology advances, computers become faster and more powerful. The increased use of these tools, however, would control humans' lives and change the way in which they think.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays